Post #372,414
3/11/13 3:07:16 PM
|
Guess I'm not getting the joke
--
Drew
|
Post #372,418
3/11/13 6:05:02 PM
|
no joke, recognition of the executive overreaching by dems
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 57 years. meep
|
Post #372,419
3/11/13 6:39:54 PM
|
Really?
How does one recognize ANYTHING in that mess? It's signed by dems, and dems are really, really, bad people. I got that. It doesn't make any frolicking sense. So, yes, not joke. I suspect this article is really only cogent after deep frying your head. I don't actually want to know THAT badly.
|
Post #372,423
3/11/13 8:32:36 PM
|
Technical difficulties
From work I can't read it. I just see random squiggles.
--
Drew
|
Post #372,428
3/11/13 9:19:38 PM
|
Re: Technical difficulties
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
|
Post #372,430
3/11/13 10:32:52 PM
|
Firefox plugin issue?
Can't read it from the laptop either. Download it and open in the viewer and it works fine.
--
Drew
|
Post #372,431
3/11/13 10:53:24 PM
|
It worked fine for me at work with FF+SumatraPDF
on Winders, with SumatraPDF as the external helper.
It looks broken (the letters look like they've been through a blender) on FF+AdobeReader on Ubuntu here at home, with Adobe as the built-in helper.
I blame Adobe.
Cheers,
Scott.
|
Post #372,432
3/11/13 11:14:33 PM
3/11/13 11:14:45 PM
|
FF/Adobe/Win at work, FF/Adobe/Ubuntu at home
Both of them are letter salad.
--
Drew
Edited by drook
March 11, 2013, 11:14:45 PM EDT
|
Post #372,433
3/11/13 11:23:49 PM
|
I had to fire up Safari to see the doc.
Alex
|
Post #372,435
3/12/13 7:11:53 AM
|
Works fine in Chrome on Win7/64 too.
|
Post #372,439
3/12/13 9:44:27 AM
|
Xerox ColorQube 9301 made the PDF...
I know that the implementation of the scanner and "PDF" engine in the Xerox is "full color and full featured" but it is not exactly a "compliant" PDF with Adobe's standard.
Anyway, that is probably the reason it looks so crappy anyway, it was probably a Full Color FAX at some dithered resolution.
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
|
Post #372,440
3/12/13 10:53:12 AM
|
It doesn't seem to be dithering.
It looks like the letters were shaken off the page and just thrown back on it randomly. It's like the instructions for the letter positions were jumbled somehow. I've very infrequently seen things like this before.
Weirdness.
Cheers,
Scott.
|
Post #372,444
3/12/13 1:02:40 PM
|
I guess Linux and
the software the use to display these kinds of things are much more tolerant of recalcitrant PDF generation engine out.
Go Linux!
Neener everyone else!
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
|
Post #372,445
3/12/13 1:25:17 PM
|
No, see my last: Firefox w/ Adobe on both platforms
--
Drew
|
Post #372,448
3/12/13 3:04:42 PM
|
Not using Adobe Reader on Linux anymore.
It is to old and they *still* aren't interested in the Linux platform.
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
|
