IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Also, interesting
Post #367,799
by crazy
12/13/12 6:14:42 AM
12/13/12 6:26:46 AM
Reply
New Also, interesting
Hey MM, you notice that?

You have been incredibly insulting, diving in imagined personal areas, since you assume anyone who smokes pot is simply incapable of rationality.

Yet you display some pretty significant disconnects to reality in your thrashing around.

When you go personal, people ignore it.

When I go a bit personal, people (Greg, and I'm sure others nodded) probably got very unhappy.

Know why?

I assume you thought: Yeah, cause they hate you.
Nahh. Pretty sure that's not it. That's just you.

Right now they are annoyed with me.

Because people don't like seeing the village idiot beat down, no matter how much of an asshole he is. It is like beating a small child.

They are probably worried about your mental stability. Any recent suicidal ideation?

I'll try to tone it down.

For them, not you.

Collapse Edited by crazy Dec. 13, 2012, 06:19:25 AM EST
Also, interesting
Hey MM, you notice that?

You have been incredibly insulting, diving in imagined personal areas, since you assume anyone who smokes pot is simply incapable of rationality.

Yet you display some pretty significant disconnects to reality in your thrashing around.

When you go personal, people ignore it.

When I go a bit personal, people (Greg, and I'm sure others nodded) probably got very unhappy.

Know why?

I assume you thought: Yeah, cause they hate you.
Nahh. Pretty sure that's not it. That's just you.

Right now they are annoyed with me.

Because people don't like seeing the village idiot beat down, no matter how much of an asshole he is. It is like beating a small child.

I'll try to tone it down.
Expand Edited by crazy Dec. 13, 2012, 06:26:46 AM EST
Expand All History | Collapse All History
Post #367,804
by mmoffitt
12/13/12 10:19:57 AM
Reply
New Do as you wish. Matters not to me.
Post #367,814
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
12/13/12 1:31:00 PM
Reply
New You're both coming across as mardy twats
Chill pills all around.
Post #367,815
by boxley
12/13/12 1:41:14 PM
Reply
New twats is a gendered insult
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 57 years. meep
Post #367,818
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
12/13/12 1:47:29 PM
Reply
New Not when I say it, it's not
Anyone can be a twat, cunt, prick, dick, cock-end, dickhead or bell-end, irrespective of their gender.

UK swearing is an equal-opportunity exercise.

But trust the Americans to over-complicate things, as usual.
Post #367,816
by crazy
12/13/12 1:45:47 PM
Reply
New kiss kiss
Post #367,819
by mmoffitt
12/13/12 1:48:43 PM
Reply
New You didn't like the Quagmire picture?
     rc lectures bho - (rcareaga) - (135) - Dec. 8, 2012, 08:03:00 PM EST
         WH replies can take months - (Another Scott) - (27) - Dec. 8, 2012, 08:39:52 PM EST
             those 70yo were 25 in 1967, -NT - (boxley) - (26) - Dec. 8, 2012, 09:50:50 PM EST
                 precisely - (rcareaga) - (22) - Dec. 8, 2012, 10:03:50 PM EST
                     I would suspect you are correct sir -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 8, 2012, 10:50:09 PM EST
                     Reminds me of that old ad. - (mmoffitt) - (20) - Dec. 9, 2012, 09:04:31 PM EST
                         just to clarify - (rcareaga) - (18) - Dec. 9, 2012, 09:30:41 PM EST
                             Bingo - (crazy) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2012, 07:31:39 AM EST
                                 I remember a few years ago with my son then 16yo Joe - (boxley) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2012, 08:34:55 AM EST
                                     Re: I remember a few years ago with my son then 16yo Joe - (jb4) - Dec. 18, 2012, 10:19:25 PM EST
                             Actually, we have discussed it. - (mmoffitt) - (14) - Dec. 10, 2012, 08:51:21 AM EST
                                 Every single one of your points is based on illegality - (crazy) - (9) - Dec. 10, 2012, 04:53:52 PM EST
                                     Read in New Scientist today: - (malraux) - (8) - Dec. 10, 2012, 09:45:15 PM EST
                                         Yeah, and people like MM will say it is WORSE - (crazy) - Dec. 11, 2012, 03:13:16 PM EST
                                         Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc. - (mmoffitt) - (6) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:36:14 AM EST
                                             Ad hominem -NT - (drook) - (1) - Dec. 12, 2012, 09:32:11 AM EST
                                                 I knew I shouldn't have added a comment. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 12, 2012, 10:10:00 AM EST
                                             Re: Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc. - (malraux) - (3) - Dec. 12, 2012, 01:10:03 PM EST
                                                 Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - Dec. 12, 2012, 01:11:18 PM EST
                                                 The Time Mag article is verification of the fallacy I stated -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Dec. 12, 2012, 01:29:34 PM EST
                                                     So what? - (crazy) - Dec. 12, 2012, 10:18:03 PM EST
                                 That would be dumb - (crazy) - (3) - Dec. 10, 2012, 05:34:01 PM EST
                                     hmm, picturing you in pearls and heels.... -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2012, 07:27:52 PM EST
                                         Re: hmm, picturing you in pearls and heels.... - (lincoln) - (1) - Dec. 27, 2012, 02:59:12 PM EST
                                             Watch it - (crazy) - Dec. 30, 2012, 09:15:17 AM EST
                         Nicely programmed - (crazy) - Dec. 10, 2012, 07:20:21 AM EST
                 Yeah? - (Another Scott) - (2) - Dec. 8, 2012, 10:27:27 PM EST
                     make up your mind or read what you write :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Dec. 8, 2012, 10:51:21 PM EST
                         Agreed you found a nit - doesn't change the bigger point. :) -NT - (Another Scott) - Dec. 8, 2012, 10:53:20 PM EST
         excellent! -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 8, 2012, 09:51:15 PM EST
         Well.. if he sees it-- - (Ashton) - Dec. 9, 2012, 06:56:54 AM EST
         victims of federally legalized pot - (boxley) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2012, 06:20:38 PM EST
             Awwww - (crazy) - Dec. 10, 2012, 06:53:03 AM EST
         Very sincere... - (folkert) - (94) - Dec. 10, 2012, 08:43:45 AM EST
             Or kill someone else. - (mmoffitt) - (93) - Dec. 10, 2012, 09:01:49 AM EST
                 neither a junkie or a user of weed, harmless - (boxley) - Dec. 10, 2012, 09:28:35 AM EST
                 Where does... - (folkert) - (3) - Dec. 10, 2012, 10:02:00 AM EST
                     No acknowledgement? - (folkert) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2012, 01:42:44 PM EST
                         You need to reread your post and my follow up. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2012, 01:44:59 PM EST
                             Was inferred by the alcohol comment. - (folkert) - Dec. 10, 2012, 04:24:20 PM EST
                 Remind me: do you drink? -NT - (rcareaga) - (87) - Dec. 10, 2012, 10:02:25 AM EST
                     Red Herring much? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (86) - Dec. 10, 2012, 10:12:22 AM EST
                         Nope - (rcareaga) - (85) - Dec. 10, 2012, 10:24:22 AM EST
                             Steeper? Well, perhaps. - (mmoffitt) - (84) - Dec. 10, 2012, 11:51:51 AM EST
                                 I don't know offhand about the advanced degrees - (rcareaga) - Dec. 10, 2012, 12:32:25 PM EST
                                 yup, right up there with fluoride never hurt anybody - (boxley) - (82) - Dec. 10, 2012, 12:48:23 PM EST
                                     [citation needed] -NT - (pwhysall) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2012, 12:49:45 PM EST
                                         Re: [citation needed] - (boxley) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2012, 01:23:15 PM EST
                                             That's not "fluoridation is bad" - (pwhysall) - Dec. 10, 2012, 02:44:12 PM EST
                                     Red herring. - (Another Scott) - (78) - Dec. 10, 2012, 12:55:28 PM EST
                                         Assumes facts not in evidence. - (mmoffitt) - (77) - Dec. 10, 2012, 01:38:53 PM EST
                                             Mixing up cause and effect - (drook) - (4) - Dec. 10, 2012, 01:41:31 PM EST
                                                 So, the chicken came first? ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2012, 01:42:16 PM EST
                                                     According to the chicken, the rooster did -NT - (drook) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2012, 02:31:20 PM EST
                                                         Yabut the rooster didn't care. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 10, 2012, 04:38:55 PM EST
                                                 lrpd that sucker -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 10, 2012, 01:54:01 PM EST
                                             criminalize (public) conduct, not chemistry - (rcareaga) - Dec. 10, 2012, 02:05:42 PM EST
                                             It's a quagmire! -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2012, 02:44:50 PM EST
                                                 No. - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 10, 2012, 03:27:44 PM EST
                                             "how many years ago was that?" - (rcareaga) - (68) - Dec. 10, 2012, 08:05:13 PM EST
                                                 That was a good thread. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - (4) - Dec. 10, 2012, 09:24:27 PM EST
                                                     Too bad about the faulty text wrap, though. - (rcareaga) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2012, 09:45:10 PM EST
                                                         Probably something long in one of the posts. - (malraux) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2012, 09:47:19 PM EST
                                                             I think it was me. - (Another Scott) - Dec. 10, 2012, 09:52:28 PM EST
                                                     Seconded. And I'm glad to see... - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 11, 2012, 11:03:03 AM EST
                                                 After all that... - (folkert) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2012, 09:35:05 PM EST
                                                     Yup. I chuckled at that. -NT - (rcareaga) - Dec. 10, 2012, 09:46:15 PM EST
                                                 Holy smokes. Thanks. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 11, 2012, 08:27:41 AM EST
                                                 Wow - (crazy) - (59) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:01:51 AM EST
                                                     dunno about anyone else but - (boxley) - (6) - Dec. 11, 2012, 06:30:28 PM EST
                                                         You show the female response - (crazy) - (5) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:26:43 AM EST
                                                             not nesting, invigourated -NT - (boxley) - (3) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:18:09 AM EST
                                                                 Then you are not done. - (crazy) - (2) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:19:25 AM EST
                                                                     2-5 no difference, after 5 too sore -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:20:47 AM EST
                                                                         Longer delay, more prolactin - (crazy) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:29:44 AM EST
                                                             nope -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 12, 2012, 10:00:56 AM EST
                                                     So why not cut out the middleman? - (Another Scott) - (38) - Dec. 12, 2012, 12:25:36 AM EST
                                                         Because THC alone is BAD - (crazy) - (17) - Dec. 12, 2012, 06:50:53 AM EST
                                                             Read that link again. - (Another Scott) - (16) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:09:20 AM EST
                                                                 Remember, even if you find it - (crazy) - (4) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:14:48 AM EST
                                                                     My goals: Rational, sensible policy. - (Another Scott) - (3) - Dec. 12, 2012, 12:51:45 PM EST
                                                                         Seems the right time for this one - (drook) - (2) - Dec. 12, 2012, 01:15:53 PM EST
                                                                             Excellent. Thanks. - (Another Scott) - Dec. 12, 2012, 02:13:52 PM EST
                                                                             Seen that one before... - (folkert) - Dec. 12, 2012, 03:39:30 PM EST
                                                                 Phhh - (crazy) - (9) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:42:43 AM EST
                                                                     Here's a couple. - (mmoffitt) - (8) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:49:46 AM EST
                                                                         2007 - (crazy) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:57:16 AM EST
                                                                         #2: Research CBD - (crazy) - (6) - Dec. 12, 2012, 09:03:47 AM EST
                                                                             Can't have anyone curing cancer now... - (folkert) - (5) - Dec. 12, 2012, 10:21:27 AM EST
                                                                                 Hmm... - (Another Scott) - (4) - Dec. 13, 2012, 02:41:40 PM EST
                                                                                     Puhleeze - (crazy) - (3) - Dec. 13, 2012, 06:03:17 PM EST
                                                                                         Ad hominem. -NT - (Another Scott) - (2) - Dec. 13, 2012, 06:11:27 PM EST
                                                                                             Point to something specific for me to prove or disprove and - (crazy) - (1) - Dec. 13, 2012, 09:06:51 PM EST
                                                                                                 Pick your poison. - (Another Scott) - Dec. 13, 2012, 09:25:19 PM EST
                                                                 Please don't assume my words - (crazy) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:56:09 AM EST
                                                         Better question: Why? - (drook) - (19) - Dec. 12, 2012, 07:59:29 AM EST
                                                             Because he is terrified of side effects that he can't - (crazy) - (2) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:12:57 AM EST
                                                                 Project much? :-p - (Another Scott) - (1) - Dec. 12, 2012, 09:34:56 AM EST
                                                                     Hokay - (crazy) - Dec. 12, 2012, 09:48:42 AM EST
                                                             Just asking the question. - (Another Scott) - (15) - Dec. 12, 2012, 01:04:45 PM EST
                                                                 But the laws now prohibit doing the science - (drook) - (14) - Dec. 12, 2012, 01:17:03 PM EST
                                                                     That's an easier law to change than the others. - (Another Scott) - (13) - Dec. 12, 2012, 01:24:21 PM EST
                                                                         Heh. Even its advocates have questions about its safety. - (mmoffitt) - (12) - Dec. 12, 2012, 01:44:15 PM EST
                                                                             Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - Dec. 12, 2012, 03:45:54 PM EST
                                                                             Your straw man, not mine - (crazy) - (10) - Dec. 12, 2012, 10:43:13 PM EST
                                                                                 You talking to me? - (Another Scott) - (9) - Dec. 12, 2012, 11:12:14 PM EST
                                                                                     I didn't say it was your job - (crazy) - (8) - Dec. 13, 2012, 05:56:35 AM EST
                                                                                         And how would that work, exactly? - (Another Scott) - (7) - Dec. 13, 2012, 08:37:05 AM EST
                                                                                             Easy - (crazy) - Dec. 13, 2012, 09:42:31 AM EST
                                                                                             View it from the other side - (drook) - (5) - Dec. 13, 2012, 10:14:13 AM EST
                                                                                                 Thought experiments are easy. - (Another Scott) - (4) - Dec. 13, 2012, 10:56:45 AM EST
                                                                                                     That's a crock - (crazy) - (2) - Dec. 13, 2012, 10:59:57 AM EST
                                                                                                         Read me in my posts. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Dec. 13, 2012, 11:10:05 AM EST
                                                                                                             But the statement is wrong - (crazy) - Dec. 13, 2012, 12:07:37 PM EST
                                                                                                     Different part of the issue - (drook) - Dec. 13, 2012, 12:25:55 PM EST
                                                     In a nutshell, then, your argument goes ... - (mmoffitt) - (12) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:30:02 AM EST
                                                         Did I expect an actual reponse - (crazy) - Dec. 12, 2012, 08:36:11 AM EST
                                                         hey during that timeperiod - (boxley) - Dec. 12, 2012, 10:02:45 AM EST
                                                         You were probably right - (crazy) - (9) - Dec. 12, 2012, 10:45:18 PM EST
                                                             Oh come on... - (folkert) - (8) - Dec. 12, 2012, 11:36:51 PM EST
                                                                 Hey, he went attempted personal WAY before me - (crazy) - Dec. 13, 2012, 06:41:04 AM EST
                                                                 Also, interesting - (crazy) - (6) - Dec. 13, 2012, 06:26:46 AM EST
                                                                     Do as you wish. Matters not to me. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 13, 2012, 10:19:57 AM EST
                                                                     You're both coming across as mardy twats - (pwhysall) - (4) - Dec. 13, 2012, 01:31:00 PM EST
                                                                         twats is a gendered insult -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Dec. 13, 2012, 01:41:14 PM EST
                                                                             Not when I say it, it's not - (pwhysall) - Dec. 13, 2012, 01:47:29 PM EST
                                                                         kiss kiss -NT - (crazy) - Dec. 13, 2012, 01:45:47 PM EST
                                                                         You didn't like the Quagmire picture? -NT - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 13, 2012, 01:48:43 PM EST
         Looks like my letter did the trick - (rcareaga) - (6) - Dec. 14, 2012, 01:50:14 PM EST
             Woot! -NT - (Another Scott) - (5) - Dec. 14, 2012, 02:38:29 PM EST
                 Ok, I'm done - (crazy) - (4) - Dec. 14, 2012, 02:45:05 PM EST
                     Finally! - (Another Scott) - (3) - Dec. 14, 2012, 04:09:38 PM EST
                         hehe - (crazy) - (2) - Dec. 14, 2012, 06:07:43 PM EST
                             Don't assume you know the future. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Dec. 14, 2012, 08:01:59 PM EST
                                 Good point - (crazy) - Dec. 14, 2012, 08:12:40 PM EST
         Another excellent IGM thread! - (Ashton) - Dec. 14, 2012, 09:12:06 PM EST

My schaden, it is freuded.
120 ms