Post #367,594
12/10/12 8:51:21 AM
|

Actually, we have discussed it.
At length even. And I was honest, as I have always tried to be with them. I told them that my personal experience was witnessing two children becoming orphans, four motherless and my own mother having head trauma, her femur jammed up under her collar bone, staying in hospital initially for two years and then spending a lifetime of return trips to hospital for additional surgeries all directly due to someone using the "harmless" illicit drug marijuana. I told them that since my own childhood was disrupted in a very negative way by that drug, it was impossible for me to speak about this issue without great emotion. But, I said, we could certainly agree on a few facts. First, it is illegal. Second, a positive drug test on their records could forever preclude them from pursuing some professions. Finally, because of its illegal status, using it would mean involving themselves with criminals. That is not an opinion. It is a fact. Using an illicit substance requires that you become involved with people in an illegal undertaking; criminals in other words.
Interesting that you noted your "outlier" produced a child with "a couple of graduate degrees". How many of the "grown children" whose parents "enjoy a relaxing doobie" with them have graduate degrees?
|
Post #367,634
12/10/12 4:53:52 PM
|

Every single one of your points is based on illegality
Every single one.
Remove the illegality and there are no points.
|
Post #367,646
12/10/12 9:45:15 PM
|

Read in New Scientist today:
Legalizing medical marijuana in Colorado led to a 14% drop in drunk driving accidents.
Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
|
Post #367,707
12/11/12 3:13:16 PM
|

Yeah, and people like MM will say it is WORSE
Sigh.
|
Post #367,733
12/12/12 8:31:11 AM
12/12/12 8:36:14 AM
|

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc.
"Research" done by a former (or current) stoner, doubtless.

Edited by mmoffitt
Dec. 12, 2012, 08:36:14 AM EST
|
Post #367,743
12/12/12 9:32:11 AM
|

Ad hominem
--
Drew
|
Post #367,748
12/12/12 10:10:00 AM
|

I knew I shouldn't have added a comment. ;0)
|
Post #367,757
12/12/12 1:10:03 PM
|

Re: Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc.
Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
|
Post #367,758
12/12/12 1:11:18 PM
|

Thanks.
|
Post #367,762
12/12/12 1:29:34 PM
|

The Time Mag article is verification of the fallacy I stated
|
Post #367,784
12/12/12 10:18:03 PM
|

So what?
Do more research.
Don't worry, we'll keep the light on for you.
|
Post #367,635
12/10/12 5:34:01 PM
|

That would be dumb
He's got a great career going, no graduate degree required.
He pays for the house that I live in.
When he walks through the door after a tough day at the office I have his version of a martini ready. No pearls or heels required, that's for when M gets home 2 hours later.
Obviously, you've done it wrong.
|
Post #367,636
12/10/12 7:27:52 PM
|

hmm, picturing you in pearls and heels....
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 57 years. meep
|
Post #368,603
12/27/12 2:59:12 PM
|

Re: hmm, picturing you in pearls and heels....
Satan (impatiently) to Newcomer: The trouble with you Chicago people is, that you think you are the best people down here; whereas you are merely the most numerous.
- - - Mark Twain ÂPuddÂnhead WilsonÂs New Calendar, 1897
|
Post #368,722
12/30/12 9:15:17 AM
|

Watch it
I actually CAN post a pic like that from my Rocky Horror days.
Heels, lingerie, and fishnets as well.
Once seen, you can't unsee it. No matter how much bleach.
|