IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Working as designed.
Facebook and Twitter aren't designed to be understood by the users. They're designed to easily and quickly share as much "monetize-able" information about users as possible. I haven't used either, but it would seem to me that it would be trivial for the distinction between public posting and private posting to be made obvious to virtually eliminate Wenis errors like these. E.g. different screen background colors for public and private posts (like different virtual terminal colors for SU sessions). The user doesn't need to understand the technology; the people who build it need to understand their users' needs if they're really interested in protecting their information.

My $0.02.

Cheers,
Scott.
New True enough.
For most free services the users are the product, not the customer.
New Correct.
The website owners of both have no real interest in "fixing" this potential privacy hole. They're happy to appear to be fixing it, but they'd really rather not.

Wade.
Static Scribblings http://staticsan.blogspot.com/
New Very nicely put.
They're [Facebook and Twitter] designed to easily and quickly share as much "monetize-able" information about users as possible.

That's the most succinct description I've ever read. Well done.
     How Twitter's design undid Weiner's briefs - (malraux) - (18)
         So it's Twitter's fault, not that he's a perv. Got it. -NT - (Steve Lowe) - (17)
             Nah, the pregnancy made him do it. - (Another Scott)
             Not the point. - (malraux) - (15)
                 Working as designed. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                     True enough. - (Steve Lowe)
                     Correct. - (static)
                     Very nicely put. - (mmoffitt)
                 Right...and that adds up to "he's an idiot" -NT - (beepster) - (9)
                     Beats going to brothels to wear diapers - (lincoln) - (8)
                         dunno - (beepster) - (7)
                             I disagree - (jake123)
                             Re: dunno - (lincoln) - (5)
                                 46922 - (beepster) - (4)
                                     Attack through imagination - (lincoln) - (3)
                                         Nice try - (beepster) - (2)
                                             Re: Nice try - (lincoln) - (1)
                                                 yeah, not as bad as spitzer, you're right -NT - (boxley)
                 Yar - (Steve Lowe)

You must respond to this LRPD before your post will be accepted.
52 ms