10 Drook asks why, when two published analyses disagree, we should believe one and not the other.
20 BeeP states a position that is vaguely related to the question, as though it answers the question (but it really doesn't).
30 Drook points out that BeeP's response is unresponsive
40 BeeP points to published article
50 Drook shows point-by-point why BeeP's article seems to be
52 irrelevant
54 inapplicable
56 unsupportive of BeeP's point
60 BeeP ignores all details and accuses Drook of missing the point
70 Drook asks what the point was, then?
80 GOTO 20