10 Drook asks why, when two published analyses disagree, we should believe one and not the other.

20 BeeP states a position that is vaguely related to the question, as though it answers the question (but it really doesn't).

30 Drook points out that BeeP's response is unresponsive

40 BeeP points to published article

50 Drook shows point-by-point why BeeP's article seems to be

   52 irrelevant

   54 inapplicable

   56 unsupportive of BeeP's point

60 BeeP ignores all details and accuses Drook of missing the point

70 Drook asks what the point was, then?

80 GOTO 20