IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Religion, Philosophy, Metaphysics Forum / Wow...not too reactionary...
Post #307,104
by beepster
4/10/09 8:21:21 AM
Reply
New Wow...not too reactionary...
...and can this ilk actually let go of a grudge?

as it chips away at the grimy pillars of unchecked Bush-era oil cronyism


If I didn't know better, "big oil" now, too, is Bush's fault? This is absolutely priceless in a very, very sad way.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
Post #307,106
by boxley
4/10/09 8:45:45 AM
Reply
New well look at the bright side :-)
"as it chips away at the grimy pillars of unchecked Obama-era financial cronyism" code reuse for future columns
Post #307,112
by beepster
4/10/09 10:07:07 AM
Reply
New :-)
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
     Mark Morford on the gay heathen hordes freaking out the - (Ashton) - (52) - April 10, 2009, 04:40:48 AM EDT
         Wow...not too reactionary... - (beepster) - (2) - April 10, 2009, 08:21:21 AM EDT
             well look at the bright side :-) - (boxley) - (1) - April 10, 2009, 08:45:45 AM EDT
                 :-) -NT - (beepster) - April 10, 2009, 10:07:07 AM EDT
         Interesting point there - (drook) - (34) - April 10, 2009, 09:46:26 AM EDT
             I have said that for years, the state has no business - (boxley) - (2) - April 10, 2009, 09:49:32 AM EDT
                 Is it? - (drook) - (1) - April 10, 2009, 10:45:27 AM EDT
                     Current law is the name on the birth certificate - (boxley) - April 10, 2009, 10:50:14 AM EDT
             Re: Interesting point there - (jay) - (20) - April 10, 2009, 12:01:58 PM EDT
                 Words count - (drook) - (18) - April 10, 2009, 03:28:30 PM EDT
                     bing bing bing! - (beepster) - (8) - April 10, 2009, 04:26:55 PM EDT
                         I view it differently. - (Another Scott) - (7) - April 10, 2009, 07:13:23 PM EDT
                             You missed the implication of what I said - (drook) - (5) - April 10, 2009, 07:48:24 PM EDT
                                 But the horse left the barn and is in the next county. - (Another Scott) - (4) - April 10, 2009, 09:00:25 PM EDT
                                     Good idea, but DOA - (drook) - April 10, 2009, 09:17:55 PM EDT
                                     marriage is a religious term not a legal term - (boxley) - (2) - April 12, 2009, 10:57:53 AM EDT
                                         So they were covered on each other's insurance? - (drook) - (1) - April 12, 2009, 11:51:48 AM EDT
                                             actually neither had insurance :-) - (boxley) - April 12, 2009, 12:13:40 PM EDT
                             nope, my marriage was illegal in virginia - (boxley) - April 12, 2009, 10:51:16 AM EDT
                     I don't think it would really work - (jay) - (8) - April 11, 2009, 12:47:49 PM EDT
                         People are lazy, I'm counting on that - (drook) - (7) - April 11, 2009, 06:52:43 PM EDT
                             There would be - (jay) - (6) - April 11, 2009, 11:32:44 PM EDT
                                 I'm not trying to change the language people use - (drook) - (5) - April 12, 2009, 11:48:53 AM EDT
                                     can we use a fade away shot - (boxley) - April 12, 2009, 12:15:10 PM EDT
                                     Which isn't enough - (jay) - (3) - April 12, 2009, 02:47:42 PM EDT
                                         in the real world the fundie gets fired - (boxley) - April 12, 2009, 03:14:26 PM EDT
                                         actually a real world example link - (boxley) - April 12, 2009, 03:22:44 PM EDT
                                         What? - (beepster) - April 12, 2009, 03:39:28 PM EDT
                 bassackwards - (boxley) - April 12, 2009, 10:48:13 AM EDT
             Interesting discussion. - (static) - (9) - April 11, 2009, 01:27:01 AM EDT
                 I think that where you stand depends on where you sit. - (Another Scott) - (4) - April 11, 2009, 09:12:03 AM EDT
                     Yep, I've 'committed marriage' upon 3 sets, so far -- - (Ashton) - April 11, 2009, 07:57:14 PM EDT
                     I had another thought. - (static) - April 12, 2009, 04:12:16 AM EDT
                     thanks for proving my point - (boxley) - (1) - April 12, 2009, 11:04:12 AM EDT
                         My point, too. - (static) - April 12, 2009, 07:56:27 PM EDT
                 Marriage probably predates religion - (jay) - (3) - April 11, 2009, 01:01:55 PM EDT
                     I seriously doubt . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - April 11, 2009, 02:06:48 PM EDT
                         Unanswerable question - (jay) - (1) - April 11, 2009, 11:36:55 PM EDT
                             Ummm . . . paper thin? - (Andrew Grygus) - April 12, 2009, 03:40:17 AM EDT
         So this thread became about who gets to define language... - (CRConrad) - (13) - Sept. 30, 2010, 07:37:52 AM EDT
             1. doesnt matter, - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2010, 07:42:29 AM EDT
                 You're missing the point by a mile, as usual. - (CRConrad) - Oct. 1, 2010, 05:45:17 AM EDT
             Define "married" - (drook) - (4) - Sept. 30, 2010, 10:02:54 AM EDT
                 Married=Living in a civil union(religious blessing optional) - (CRConrad) - (3) - Oct. 1, 2010, 06:10:50 AM EDT
                     Dammit, you're making a good point - (drook) - Oct. 1, 2010, 09:20:19 AM EDT
                     Well said. Here's an interesting summary. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 13, 2010, 01:33:24 PM EDT
                     Stuart Chase ceased revolving-in-grave upon this utterance - (Ashton) - Oct. 13, 2010, 07:41:02 PM EDT
             Each religion can define it for themselves - (mhuber) - (5) - Oct. 1, 2010, 01:55:57 PM EDT
                 Sure-if they also name it for themselves.'Coz "marriage"... - (CRConrad) - (4) - Oct. 2, 2010, 07:14:39 PM EDT
                     FWIW, this Xian agrees with me - (drook) - (3) - Oct. 13, 2010, 11:31:02 AM EDT
                         I'm dealing with this right now - (crazy) - (2) - Oct. 13, 2010, 02:02:46 PM EDT
                             I can picture the joke now - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 13, 2010, 02:44:56 PM EDT
                                 It writes itself. - (crazy) - Oct. 14, 2010, 11:16:19 AM EDT

I'm gonna grab you by your Supercut and shake you like a fresh glowstick!
236 ms