Re: The future death of HTTP?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #29,952

2/27/02 10:16:51 AM

Re: The future death of HTTP?

I thought for really persistant connections you'd use something like sockets to control a back-and-forth protocol. Something like many (most?) implementations of ODBC.

Where each demon is slain, more hate is raised, yet hate unchecked also multiplies. - L. E. Modesitt

The future death of HTTP? - (bconnors) - (9) - Feb. 27, 2002, 09:49:07 AM EST

Re: The future death of HTTP? - (wharris2) - Feb. 27, 2002, 10:16:51 AM EST

Well, I certainly hope soon. - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Feb. 27, 2002, 10:30:40 AM EST

You seem to be confused... http is NOT html. - (jake123) - (1) - Feb. 27, 2002, 10:34:33 AM EST

I knew I shouldn't post before coffee. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Feb. 27, 2002, 10:41:02 AM EST

Time for new glasses - (drewk) - Feb. 27, 2002, 10:35:15 AM EST

As I said on Slashdot ... - (drewk) - (3) - Feb. 27, 2002, 10:40:10 AM EST

Uphill battle either way. - (static) - (2) - Feb. 28, 2002, 10:03:20 PM EST

That's basically the idea - (drewk) - (1) - March 1, 2002, 08:41:03 AM EST

It just sounds stupid - (nking) - March 1, 2002, 04:18:07 PM EST

Chips, dips, chains, whips.
60 ms