Difference...

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #29,772 by bepatient 2/26/02 11:45:42 AM Reply	Difference... ...the fact that Enron played both sides is just that...fact. The rest is spin. There's a difference between political spin and truthfullness (or lack thereof) under oath. Nit acknowledged...and returned. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #29,782 by Silverlock 2/26/02 12:31:44 PM Reply	Remind me What, exactly was Clinton's lie? Or was it more of a lawyer weasleing his way through a case? My understanding of it was he wanted to use a different "legally accepted" definition of the phrase "sexual relations" than his deposer wanted to use. Am I wrong here? Nice downplaying of his dissembling (generously speaking) about the Enron donations BTW. "You were a major beneficiary of Enron throughout your political carreer." "Enron supported my opponent" Still doesn't sound exactly truthful to me. With this much manure around, there must be a pony somewhere.
Post #29,791 by Simon_Jester 2/26/02 12:43:24 PM Reply	Ah, but that's not the problem... Regardless of whether or not Enron donated to both sides, the real question is what happens now. Since Bush is in charge of the Executative Branch, prosecuting (or failing to prosecute) falls directly (or indirectly) on him. As yet, to the best of my knowledge, no charge have been filed against Enron, Lay, Skillings or Fastow. (Yet it is a crime for a company to take/use funds from it's employee's pension). (And note: last I checked, the Clayman Islands STILL hadn't received any official requests for help in an investigation.)
Post #29,813 by Brandioch 2/26/02 1:43:28 PM Reply	Ditto Nothing to add. Just endorsements.

An open letter to Dubya. - (mmoffitt) - (41) - Feb. 26, 2002, 10:40:24 AM EST

A for effort (straining for the Clinton stuff) - (boxley) - (39) - Feb. 26, 2002, 10:47:06 AM EST

Don't forget... - (bepatient) - (38) - Feb. 26, 2002, 11:23:38 AM EST

Nit - (Silverlock) - (4) - Feb. 26, 2002, 11:39:41 AM EST

Difference... - (bepatient) - (3) - Feb. 26, 2002, 11:45:42 AM EST

Remind me - (Silverlock) - (2) - Feb. 26, 2002, 12:31:44 PM EST

Ah, but that's not the problem... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Feb. 26, 2002, 12:43:24 PM EST

Ditto - (Brandioch) - Feb. 26, 2002, 01:43:28 PM EST

Allegations. - (Brandioch) - (32) - Feb. 26, 2002, 12:37:42 PM EST

so, ]:-> drug taking == rape? -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 26, 2002, 12:41:35 PM EST

Are you admitting both? - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 26, 2002, 01:39:33 PM EST

not without incontrovertable proof :-) - (boxley) - Feb. 26, 2002, 02:26:08 PM EST

No I won't. - (bepatient) - (28) - Feb. 26, 2002, 04:36:21 PM EST

And you don't see a problem, do you? - (Brandioch) - (27) - Feb. 26, 2002, 04:58:56 PM EST

Folkways, Mores, Puritanism - (Ashton) - (8) - Feb. 26, 2002, 05:59:21 PM EST

Link - (bepatient) - (7) - Feb. 26, 2002, 10:25:48 PM EST

I get all my facts from "members.tripod.com" - Bill Patient -NT - (Brandioch) - (5) - Feb. 27, 2002, 11:17:44 AM EST

Check the copyright info at the bottom - (bepatient) - (4) - Feb. 27, 2002, 12:51:00 PM EST

Check the URL at the top. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 27, 2002, 01:28:07 PM EST

Oh yeah.... - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 28, 2002, 12:54:36 AM EST

Ummm, no. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 28, 2002, 05:09:50 PM EST

Really? - (bepatient) - Feb. 28, 2002, 05:47:36 PM EST

Curiouser and curiouser... - (Simon_Jester) - Feb. 27, 2002, 01:21:28 PM EST

Not about Lewinsky - (bepatient) - (17) - Feb. 26, 2002, 10:16:29 PM EST

Forgot the most important... - (screamer) - (8) - Feb. 26, 2002, 10:53:52 PM EST

Right on! And, very well said. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Feb. 27, 2002, 11:02:56 AM EST

You're partially right. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 27, 2002, 11:10:18 AM EST

This is the last one, I promise... - (screamer) - (1) - Feb. 27, 2002, 02:27:51 PM EST

That was my point. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 27, 2002, 02:59:45 PM EST

Re: You're partially right. - (Ric Locke) - March 2, 2002, 06:11:15 PM EST

Isn't this the same woman who said ... - (Silverlock) - Feb. 27, 2002, 12:13:00 PM EST

Problems with your characterization. - (Ashton) - (1) - Feb. 28, 2002, 12:28:04 AM EST

Nah! Maybe it was that way for you. - (a6l6e6x) - Feb. 28, 2002, 01:00:17 PM EST

Like I said....."alleged". - (Brandioch) - (7) - Feb. 27, 2002, 10:57:37 AM EST

Alleged on both sides... - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 27, 2002, 11:02:11 AM EST

Like I said......"alleged". - (Brandioch) - (5) - Feb. 27, 2002, 11:13:06 AM EST

So its ok for you...just noone else. - (bepatient) - (4) - Feb. 27, 2002, 12:29:42 PM EST

Awwww, is the poor baby going to cry? - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 27, 2002, 01:25:09 PM EST

My my. - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 28, 2002, 01:01:41 AM EST

I can pick up a box of nappies for you. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 28, 2002, 05:03:57 PM EST

I like the kind with the lotion, k? -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 28, 2002, 05:48:38 PM EST

Well, it could have been a lot worse. - (marlowe) - Feb. 26, 2002, 03:21:55 PM EST

The natural enemy of the tightrope walker is the common bee.
70 ms