IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Patent Wars and Antitrust Forum
/
Quick question:
Post #29,606
by
jb4
2/25/02 9:44:02 AM
Reply
Quick question:
[...] + Ballmer's Babbitt-persona marketing.
Just making sure: Is that "Babbitt" or "Bobbitt"?
jb4
(Resistance is
not
futile...)
Post #29,690
by
Ashton
2/25/02 9:57:20 PM
Reply
'a' as in the Sinclair Lewis book, "Babbitt" Still: :-\ufffd
Judge order MS to hand over source code
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (149)
- Feb. 16, 2002, 12:07:30 PM EST
Re: Judge order MS to hand over source code
- (
Yendor
)
- Feb. 16, 2002, 02:29:50 PM EST
What a precedent!
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Feb. 16, 2002, 03:12:07 PM EST
If it's true, CKK certainly has guts
- (
tonytib
)
- Feb. 16, 2002, 06:08:05 PM EST
Holy mother of pearl!
- (
Silverlock
)
- Feb. 17, 2002, 02:23:18 AM EST
Interesting (?) vote percentages
- (
Ashton
)
- (1)
- Feb. 17, 2002, 05:57:24 PM EST
I'm wondering about the size of the fine
- (
Silverlock
)
- Feb. 17, 2002, 06:43:18 PM EST
How to test it?
- (
Brandioch
)
- (4)
- Feb. 18, 2002, 07:56:49 PM EST
General idea
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (3)
- Feb. 18, 2002, 10:28:31 PM EST
Obfuscation.
- (
static
)
- (2)
- Feb. 18, 2002, 10:46:34 PM EST
Re: Obfuscation (I guess you're against it...)
- (
jb4
)
- (1)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 09:33:22 AM EST
OT: I am getting *so* many comments about by my icon! :-)
-NT
- (
static
)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 12:51:23 AM EST
Nuttiness
- (
Squidley
)
- (137)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 02:37:11 PM EST
Semantics
- (
wharris2
)
- (136)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 03:00:52 PM EST
Re: Semantics
- (
Squidley
)
- (135)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 03:16:37 PM EST
But it's not modular.
- (
wharris2
)
- (122)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 04:45:48 PM EST
No?
- (
Squidley
)
- (121)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 05:38:52 PM EST
No.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (7)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 06:15:49 PM EST
I Respectfully Disagree
- (
Squidley
)
- (6)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 06:41:42 PM EST
Your questions are answered in news stories.
- (
Another Scott
)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 07:29:50 PM EST
If it >IS< "modular".............
- (
Brandioch
)
- (4)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 07:44:32 PM EST
Re: If it >IS< "modular".............
- (
Squidley
)
- (3)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 11:30:08 PM EST
Definitions vs. designs.
- (
Brandioch
)
- (2)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 01:55:17 PM EST
Re: Definitions vs. designs.
- (
Squidley
)
- (1)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 09:56:05 AM EST
So, now we look at history.
- (
Brandioch
)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 12:23:18 PM EST
What?
- (
pwhysall
)
- (1)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 06:20:15 PM EST
Oops, You're Right!
- (
Squidley
)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 06:49:22 PM EST
Modules that cannot be replaced or removed
- (
imric
)
- (76)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 07:51:44 PM EST
Re: Modules that cannot be replaced or removed
- (
Squidley
)
- (75)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 11:20:13 PM EST
No.
- (
imric
)
- (74)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 06:06:09 AM EST
APIs & Modularity
- (
Squidley
)
- (73)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 11:25:42 AM EST
Re: APIs & Modularity
- (
drewk
)
- (71)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 12:02:56 PM EST
Re: APIs & Modularity
- (
Squidley
)
- (69)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 01:33:12 PM EST
This is really funny.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (23)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 01:55:47 PM EST
Re: This is really funny.
- (
Squidley
)
- (22)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 09:18:25 AM EST
MS should control PC configuration?
- (
warmachine
)
- (6)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 10:54:20 AM EST
Re: MS should control PC configuration?
- (
Squidley
)
- (5)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 12:06:02 PM EST
you are absolutely right
- (
boxley
)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 12:22:13 PM EST
I haven't met one that wouldn't.
- (
Brandioch
)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 12:33:22 PM EST
A natural monopoly would be leverage into a free market.
- (
warmachine
)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 01:55:51 PM EST
How the monopoly works.
- (
bepatient
)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 02:57:47 PM EST
Homogenity over all.
- (
imric
)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 05:30:40 PM EST
Re: This is really funny.
- (
Steven A S
)
- (2)
- Feb. 27, 2002, 06:49:22 PM EST
Have to have a command processor?
- (
wharris2
)
- (1)
- Feb. 27, 2002, 10:52:09 PM EST
On Win9X
- (
Steven A S
)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 06:52:39 AM EST
Re: This is really funny.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (1)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 03:29:58 AM EST
Architectures
- (
Squidley
)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 07:06:04 PM EST
Re: This is really funny.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (9)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 07:43:08 AM EST
Re: This is really funny.
- (
Squidley
)
- (8)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 02:13:21 PM EST
And just exactly how long would it take . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (6)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 03:44:32 PM EST
Thank you...
- (
bepatient
)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 04:24:18 PM EST
Besides which ...
- (
drewk
)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 04:29:29 PM EST
Re: And just exactly how long would it take . .
- (
Squidley
)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 04:36:06 PM EST
But would it work?
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (2)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 04:39:47 PM EST
Kinda like coding around non-standard behaviour in IE? :)
-NT
- (
Meerkat
)
- (1)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 06:19:30 PM EST
Oh shock non-standard IE behavior? (me quivers)
- (
wharris2
)
- March 1, 2002, 06:13:03 AM EST
OK
- (
pwhysall
)
- March 1, 2002, 02:22:44 AM EST
You ARE Michel Le Moron!
- (
jb4
)
- (44)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 02:17:39 PM EST
Dont accuse
- (
boxley
)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 02:59:47 PM EST
Naah, just went to the same . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (41)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 05:31:12 PM EST
Re: Naah, just went to the same . . .
- (
Squidley
)
- (40)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 09:23:48 AM EST
Cosmic-proportion delusions of grandeur from a bad $hilling
- (
CRConrad
)
- (39)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 04:57:31 AM EST
Nah.
- (
imric
)
- (38)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 06:18:46 AM EST
No, I'm fairly sure he's serious; he's $hilling for real.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (37)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 07:02:02 AM EST
Squidley-Diddley;
- (
imric
)
- (36)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 07:41:19 AM EST
Yeah, but if you're stupid enough, why let that stop you?
- (
CRConrad
)
- (35)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 08:08:05 AM EST
I can't believe you didn't catch this
- (
Silverlock
)
- (6)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 08:48:05 AM EST
Yeah, I know - but how the heck could I...
- (
CRConrad
)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 12:02:40 PM EST
I used my usual spell checker . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (4)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 12:32:16 PM EST
Just tried your spell checker
- (
Silverlock
)
- (2)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 12:46:46 PM EST
Hmmm . . no such message from Google here . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 01:18:31 PM EST
Those damn bats. They're everywhere.
- (
Silverlock
)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 01:26:07 PM EST
So much for those right-wing "think tank" innaleckchuls, eh?
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 02:42:10 PM EST
I always have to laugh...
- (
admin
)
- (16)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 08:51:30 AM EST
Well if Squidley is not...
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (15)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 10:17:06 AM EST
Re: Well if Squidley is not...
- (
Squidley
)
- (14)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 10:45:34 AM EST
And what makes you think you look any different here?
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (13)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 11:57:16 AM EST
Why, your presence, of course!
- (
Squidley
)
- (12)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 01:38:10 PM EST
I guess MSFT is expecting to lose, then...
-NT
- (
jake123
)
- (11)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 02:43:39 PM EST
Sure! Just like they always do :-)
-NT
- (
Squidley
)
- (10)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 02:56:14 PM EST
It ain't over til Judge K-K sings.
- (
Ashton
)
- (4)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 03:45:46 PM EST
Re: It ain't over til Judge K-K sings.
- (
Squidley
)
- (3)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 04:07:31 PM EST
My what colorful intellekchul epithets you have
- (
Ashton
)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 07:18:48 PM EST
Yes, but over at Petrele's VarLinux forum . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 11:02:27 PM EST
Re: Yes, but over at Petrele(y)'s VarLinux forum . .
- (
Ashton
)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 01:43:13 AM EST
I think they're going to lose badly this time.
- (
jake123
)
- (4)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 04:13:03 PM EST
I think you're way optimistic
- (
wharris2
)
- (3)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 04:28:51 PM EST
I don't.
- (
jake123
)
- (2)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 08:55:13 PM EST
Gates, Ballmer scared?
- (
wharris2
)
- (1)
- Feb. 27, 2002, 03:44:39 AM EST
Yeah... you're right.
- (
jake123
)
- Feb. 27, 2002, 10:40:12 AM EST
Hey!
- (
imric
)
- (10)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 09:01:32 AM EST
*Snort*
- (
Silverlock
)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 09:17:34 AM EST
"Training ground"? Dunno... Let's hope it's more like...
- (
CRConrad
)
- (8)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 12:00:17 PM EST
I noticed (possibly coincidence...possibly not)
- (
bepatient
)
- (7)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 05:03:56 PM EST
Really..
- (
Ashton
)
- (6)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 07:27:10 PM EST
Karsten gave me the archives...
- (
bepatient
)
- (5)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 10:33:38 PM EST
True - the roster was larger (and heavier?)
- (
Ashton
)
- (4)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 01:59:42 AM EST
If you are nice
- (
imric
)
- (3)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 06:01:37 AM EST
Would have to be ftp...
- (
bepatient
)
- (2)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 10:48:33 AM EST
Legal
- (
kmself
)
- (1)
- Feb. 28, 2002, 08:00:59 PM EST
Thats essentially my thinking.
- (
bepatient
)
- March 1, 2002, 10:27:25 AM EST
You ARE too kind!
- (
Squidley
)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 10:31:13 AM EST
Intent
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 01:47:36 PM EST
No.
- (
imric
)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 06:42:06 PM EST
Are you for real?!?
- (
jb4
)
- (33)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 09:11:57 AM EST
Hey, is that a trick question?
- (
Squidley
)
- (32)
- Feb. 21, 2002, 10:21:22 AM EST
No tricks, just treats
- (
jb4
)
- (30)
- Feb. 22, 2002, 10:01:59 AM EST
No, gems!
- (
Squidley
)
- (29)
- Feb. 22, 2002, 01:55:25 PM EST
Bwaaahaaahhaaaa!!
- (
Silverlock
)
- (1)
- Feb. 22, 2002, 02:20:38 PM EST
Re: Bwaaahaaahhaaaa!!
- (
Squidley
)
- Feb. 22, 2002, 02:44:06 PM EST
Are you REALLY that dense (or do they pay for stupidity?)
- (
jb4
)
- (4)
- Feb. 22, 2002, 02:42:48 PM EST
There you go again with the trick questions.
- (
Squidley
)
- (3)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 04:51:45 PM EST
NTFS != HTML
- (
jb4
)
- (2)
- Feb. 25, 2002, 09:40:11 AM EST
Re: NTFS != HTML
- (
Squidley
)
- (1)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 02:23:49 PM EST
Don't bogart tht joint, my friend...
- (
jb4
)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 07:03:02 PM EST
Why did you drop the other threads?
- (
Brandioch
)
- (6)
- Feb. 22, 2002, 06:30:27 PM EST
Need... some... WD-40...
- (
Squidley
)
- (5)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 05:56:18 PM EST
Ummm . . aren't you working overtime?
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 09:33:09 PM EST
I could shill 18/7..........if...........the price was right
- (
Brandioch
)
- Feb. 24, 2002, 12:15:15 AM EST
A kinder, gentler, Microsoft at work...
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (2)
- Feb. 25, 2002, 09:47:07 AM EST
Be aware that this new policy . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Feb. 25, 2002, 10:56:33 AM EST
I have a remedy, then:
- (
Ashton
)
- Feb. 25, 2002, 10:25:57 PM EST
Wow...
- (
bepatient
)
- (14)
- Feb. 22, 2002, 07:17:39 PM EST
Now, now...
- (
Squidley
)
- (13)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 05:43:05 PM EST
I could almost grant such a Pollyanna view of it all..
- (
Ashton
)
- (10)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 07:20:53 PM EST
As I have been saying for years . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (7)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 09:29:41 PM EST
Do you mean that *recently* the CRM folks spilled their guts
- (
Ashton
)
- (6)
- Feb. 24, 2002, 03:20:05 AM EST
Siebel is the main victim here.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (5)
- Feb. 24, 2002, 01:24:24 PM EST
Speaking of Accounting software . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Feb. 24, 2002, 02:02:55 PM EST
Scary.. 7 years to find all the important glitches
- (
Ashton
)
- Feb. 24, 2002, 06:07:44 PM EST
Andrew, care to update the current status?
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- (2)
- Nov. 5, 2004, 10:21:05 AM EST
Update
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Nov. 6, 2004, 06:06:36 PM EST
And Thank God for that.
-NT
- (
folkert
)
- Nov. 6, 2004, 09:16:48 PM EST
Quick question:
- (
jb4
)
- (1)
- Feb. 25, 2002, 09:44:02 AM EST
'a' as in the Sinclair Lewis book, "Babbitt" Still: :-\ufffd
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Feb. 25, 2002, 09:57:20 PM EST
*chuckle*
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- Feb. 24, 2002, 12:15:05 AM EST
Re: *chuckle*
- (
Squidley
)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 03:27:57 PM EST
I guess you didn't read the MS memos from the trial.
- (
Another Scott
)
- Feb. 22, 2002, 11:07:55 PM EST
*sigh* Again?
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (9)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 04:56:05 PM EST
Re: *sigh* Again?
- (
Squidley
)
- (8)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 06:00:26 PM EST
But they don't have to be non-working.
- (
Brandioch
)
- (7)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 07:34:56 PM EST
Re: But they don't have to be non-working.
- (
Squidley
)
- (6)
- Feb. 19, 2002, 11:45:00 PM EST
Now that would be stupid.
- (
Brandioch
)
- (5)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 01:44:40 PM EST
Re: Now that would be stupid.
- (
Squidley
)
- (4)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 02:33:41 PM EST
Pick one
- (
drewk
)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 02:40:04 PM EST
Purpose
- (
Steve Lowe
)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 03:22:58 PM EST
Bzzzzzt!
- (
Brandioch
)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 03:49:59 PM EST
And another thing ...
- (
drewk
)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 04:34:00 PM EST
I believe the anti-trust trial showed IE wasn't modular
- (
warmachine
)
- (1)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 04:37:03 AM EST
+5 Informative.
- (
static
)
- Feb. 20, 2002, 04:52:40 AM EST
i
we
they
.org
The telltale breath with sen-sen.
125 ms