There may well be things that we can't detect now that may be detectable in the future. And those things may be important in treating disease. But at the moment, the explanations sound too much like jibber-jabber.

After all, our picture of the body is that it responds to stimuli and that physical things are incorporated and excreted. Chemistry and electromagnetism are the foundation. If something isn't detectable, then how can the body respond to it? If someone wants to come up with a new picture of how the body works, it needs to take what we know and build upon it - not expect us to rely on explanations without evidence.

Cheers,
Scott.