Smart Tax Policy??? - (bepatient) - (20) - Aug. 10, 2007, 01:36:48 AM EDT
         Still worth it. - (Andrew Grygus) - Aug. 10, 2007, 02:31:36 AM EDT
         How can reducing smoking be a bad thing to be vetoed? -NT - (warmachine) - (13) - Aug. 10, 2007, 02:50:28 AM EDT
             Not the point - (bepatient) - (12) - Aug. 10, 2007, 03:03:05 AM EDT
                 Reducing smoking reduces healthcare costs - (warmachine) - (11) - Aug. 10, 2007, 07:15:59 AM EDT
                     Once again - (bepatient) - (5) - Aug. 10, 2007, 09:02:01 AM EDT
                         Clearly the solution is to . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Aug. 10, 2007, 10:31:22 AM EDT
                             That is a plan . - (bepatient) - Aug. 10, 2007, 10:55:02 AM EDT
                             Why not cut to the chase? - (Ashton) - Aug. 12, 2007, 02:50:20 AM EDT
                         So what does Bush know? - (warmachine) - (1) - Aug. 10, 2007, 11:13:06 AM EDT
                             you will spend more in the long run - (boxley) - Aug. 10, 2007, 11:34:15 AM EDT
                     Not so fast! - (danreck) - (4) - Aug. 10, 2007, 02:56:30 PM EDT
                         Well, you're right - (jake123) - Aug. 10, 2007, 04:54:43 PM EDT
                         You hold on, too! - (Another Scott) - (1) - Aug. 10, 2007, 05:06:50 PM EDT
                             Re: You hold on, too! - (danreck) - Aug. 13, 2007, 11:51:49 PM EDT
                         Maybe - (warmachine) - Aug. 10, 2007, 05:13:10 PM EDT
         Bush is binary on taxes-He rationalizes the reason post hoc. -NT - (Another Scott) - Aug. 10, 2007, 07:22:06 AM EDT
         Possibly - (JayMehaffey) - (3) - Aug. 10, 2007, 09:44:01 AM EDT
             Secret? - (bepatient) - (2) - Aug. 10, 2007, 09:53:24 AM EDT
                 Bush is going a lot further right now - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Aug. 10, 2007, 12:12:57 PM EDT
                     just reversing the bush tax cuts would be the biggest -NT - (boxley) - Aug. 10, 2007, 12:20:37 PM EDT