IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Are you pre-disposed towards a specific political bias?

"All people are born alike-except Republicans and Democrats," quipped Groucho Marx, and in fact it turns out that personality differences between liberals and conservatives are evident in early childhood. In 1969, Berkeley professors Jack and Jeanne Block embarked on a study of childhood personality, asking nursery school teachers to rate children's temperaments. They weren't even thinking about political orientation.

Twenty years later, they decided to compare the subjects' childhood personalities with their political preferences as adults. They found arresting patterns. As kids, liberals had developed close relationships with peers and were rated by their teachers as self-reliant, energetic, impulsive, and resilient. People who were conservative at age 23 had been described by their teachers as easily victimized, easily offended, indecisive, fearful, rigid, inhibited, and vulnerable at age 3. The reason for the difference, the Blocks hypothesized, was that insecure kids most needed the reassurance of tradition and authority, and they found it in conservative politics.

[link|http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/index.php?term=pto-20061222-000001&page=1|Psychology Today]

I hope Ashton does a review on this story.
lincoln

"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from." -- E.L. Doctorow


Never apply a Star Trek solution to a Babylon 5 problem.


I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the United States.


[link|mailto:golf_lover44@yahoo.com|contact me]
New Very reminiscent of Bob Altemeyer
[link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Altemeyer|Robert Altemeyer] is a psych prof at Univ of Manitoba. His book The Authoritarians is available [link|http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/|online]. He also says authoritarian followers are more apt to see the world as dangerous. From chapter 2, "... it turns out in experiments that a person's fear of a dangerous world predicts various kinds of authoritarian aggression better than any other unpleasant feeling I have looked at."

The book is very readable.
New According to their reasoning
I should be a flaming liberal.

Advanced degree, studied abroad, outgoing as a youth...

Also wondering what they mean when they say that going for an MBA leads to more conservative views towards minorities. Is this a polite way of saying going to Wharton makes one a racist?
Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
New You are in some senses.
Liberal != control, in this sense, so their liberals would be against social programs and the like, since they exert control.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New You're both wrong
In Canada, Liberal means something different from liberal. Of course, at the same time, liberal in the U.S. means something quite different from liberal in the rest of the world.

Beep, you ARE a flaming liberal, if by liberal you mean liberalism, the movement that started in England in the eighteenth and esp. nineteenth centuries. The word liberal has a specific meaning, and it's not the meaning used by blowhard commentators in the U.S. with a specific political agenda to push.

Liberalism (as opposed to the Liberals, a political party up here in the GWN) is not the lampoon painted of it in the U.S. For one thing, it places a high degree of personal responsibility on the individual. OTOH, it also recognises that unfettered capitalism leads to bad results, and has mechanisms (as well as theories) about how to manage those problems successfully... which leads to why it's demonised in the U.S.; the people who own the media don't like the idea that their ability to take what they can get should have any limits on it, no matter how bad the results may be.
     Are you pre-disposed towards a specific political bias? - (lincoln) - (4)
         Very reminiscent of Bob Altemeyer - (GBert)
         According to their reasoning - (bepatient) - (2)
             You are in some senses. - (admin) - (1)
                 You're both wrong - (jake123)

The sweeter the blood is, the fatter the fleas.
30 ms