That's not what I had a problem with

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #277,927 by drewk 3/10/07 9:14:12 AM Reply	That's not what I had a problem with Yes, it probably did say "photo only". But it also said it was 4.9 ounces, which is what she basically focused on. So I think the scammer didn't even pull the scam right, so she's dishonest and stupid. Gee, what're the odds? On the plus side, I'm glad that she slammed her anyway. Even if it did say "photo only" it was clearly an attempt to defraud. Good for Judy for making an example of her. On then negative side, I thought attacking the husband was out of line, as was telling her to get a job and do something more useful than making babies. I think running an ongoing criminal enterprise -- arguable, but you can take the position -- could maybe get you in trouble with the child welfare people. But she went way over the line. === Kip Hawley is still an idiot. === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #277,935 by CRConrad 3/10/07 11:09:50 AM Reply	Why? - It was clearly a photo of a 4.9oz phone! :-) Yeah, the bit about the husband "sent you here" -- while it could well be true, and even if it probably was -- nice going PRESUMING that the man is calling the shots in the marriage to that extent, Judge-LADY. The whole fucking thing, as I said to Wade, can only be summed-up as "Sheesh!". (Well, or "words to that effect".) [link\|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode\|Christian R. Conrad] (I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.) Ah, the Germans: Masters of Convoluted Simplification. — [link\|http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1603\|Jehovah]
Post #277,940 by bepatient 3/10/07 11:45:37 AM Reply	Its called fraud and it is illegal. The judge (and in non Judy cases the jury) can and likely would, in this case, determine that the intent was to defraud and that the act of acception over $400 for 2 pictures would corroborate that intent. What they did was illegal and I agree with the outcome. Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry._{Adrian Belew}
Post #277,957 by pwhysall 3/10/07 12:24:39 PM Reply	Nothing the Judge said wasn't true. Whether it was appropriate or not, I dunno. It's telly; legally binding telly, but telly all the same. The right conclusion was reached. Interesting that the defendant apparently didn't see anything wrong in what she was doing. Peter [link\|http://www.no2id.net/\|Don't Let The Terrorists Win] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes! [link\|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall\|A better terminal emulator] [image\|http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h262/pwhysall/Misc/saveus.png\|0\|Darwinia\|\|]
Post #277,963 by boxley 3/10/07 1:09:31 PM Reply	typical scofflaw, doesnt see anything wrong with fleecing the rubes.If she was an honest scofflaw she would cheat the cheaters. thanx, bill Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep reach me at [link\|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net\|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]

How to piss off Judge Judy - (Bman) - (15) - March 9, 2007, 04:10:06 AM EST

Day-am! -NT - (imqwerky) - March 9, 2007, 08:32:38 AM EST

Excellent. - (admin) - March 9, 2007, 10:03:26 AM EST

You're a theif, get a job! Love it. -NT - (Steve Lowe) - March 9, 2007, 12:29:56 PM EST

Oooooooooohh ... saw the decision coming, but not the amount -NT - (drewk) - March 9, 2007, 10:20:10 PM EST

They're both dumbasses. - (static) - (8) - March 10, 2007, 02:39:28 AM EST

The "Judge" too. - (CRConrad) - (7) - March 10, 2007, 03:27:40 AM EST

Take this with a grain of salt. - (static) - (1) - March 10, 2007, 04:40:53 AM EST

Sheesh. -NT - (CRConrad) - March 10, 2007, 05:44:41 AM EST

That's not what I had a problem with - (drewk) - (4) - March 10, 2007, 09:14:12 AM EST

Why? - It was clearly a photo of a 4.9oz phone! :-) - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 10, 2007, 11:09:50 AM EST

Its called fraud and it is illegal. - (bepatient) - March 10, 2007, 11:45:37 AM EST

Nothing the Judge said wasn't true. - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 10, 2007, 12:24:39 PM EST

typical scofflaw, doesnt see anything wrong - (boxley) - March 10, 2007, 01:09:31 PM EST

My fscking Ghod! - (jb4) - March 10, 2007, 12:04:50 PM EST

One of her best lines: - (bionerd) - March 10, 2007, 12:19:56 PM EST

iwethey.org

Battling him is like wiping off puppy slobber.
130 ms