IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / The "Judge" too.
Post #277,911
by CRConrad
3/10/07 3:27:40 AM
Reply
New The "Judge" too.
Asked the defendant "Where exactly in your ad does it say 'photo only'?" early on, and never let her answer. When the dumb-ass defendant had found it and tried to point it out, the dumb-ass "judge"[*] kept telling her to shut up. Hey, dumbass, you ASKED for this yourself, only minutes ago!

So she's HARDLY "smarter in one finger than you'll ever be even if you live to be a hundred and twenty / a hundred and fifty[+]" -- they were ALL FOUR of them equally fucking stupid.

The smartest person in the room was OBVIOUSLY the bailiff. Or, OK, perhaps one of the camera men. (The audience? Come on, THINK for a second!)



[*]: Is she really one? (An ex-one at the most, I hope -- AT LEAST not practicing in REAL courts at the same time as she performs in this travesty.)

[+]: She got it mixed up; couldn't remember what she'd said HERSELF from one minute to the next.


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Ah, the Germans: Masters of Convoluted Simplification. — [link|http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1603|Jehovah]
Post #277,916
by static
3/10/07 4:40:53 AM
Reply
New Take this with a grain of salt.
According to [link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge_Judy|Wikipedia], the court is real.

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please



-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

· my ·
· [link|http://staticsan.livejournal.com/|blog] ·
· [link|http://yceran.org/|website] ·
Post #277,920
by CRConrad
3/10/07 5:44:41 AM
Reply
New Sheesh.
Post #277,927
by drewk
Picture of drewk
3/10/07 9:14:12 AM
Reply
New That's not what I had a problem with
Yes, it probably did say "photo only". But it also said it was 4.9 ounces, which is what she basically focused on. So I think the scammer didn't even pull the scam right, so she's dishonest and stupid. Gee, what're the odds?

On the plus side, I'm glad that she slammed her anyway. Even if it did say "photo only" it was clearly an attempt to defraud. Good for Judy for making an example of her.

On then negative side, I thought attacking the husband was out of line, as was telling her to get a job and do something more useful than making babies. I think running an ongoing criminal enterprise -- arguable, but you can take the position -- could maybe get you in trouble with the child welfare people. But she went way over the line.
===

Kip Hawley is still an idiot.

===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
Post #277,935
by CRConrad
3/10/07 11:09:50 AM
Reply
New Why? - It was clearly a photo of a 4.9oz phone! :-)
Yeah, the bit about the husband "sent you here" -- while it *could* well be true, and even if it *probably* was -- nice going PRESUMING that the man is calling the shots in the marriage to that extent, Judge-LADY.

The *whole fucking thing*, as I said to Wade, can only be summed-up as "Sheesh!".

(Well, or "words to that effect".)


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Ah, the Germans: Masters of Convoluted Simplification. — [link|http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1603|Jehovah]
Post #277,940
by bepatient
Picture of bepatient
3/10/07 11:45:37 AM
Reply
New Its called fraud and it is illegal.
The judge (and in non Judy cases the jury) can and likely would, in this case, determine that the intent was to defraud and that the act of acception over $400 for 2 pictures would corroborate that intent.

What they did was illegal and I agree with the outcome.
Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
Post #277,957
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
3/10/07 12:24:39 PM
Reply
New Nothing the Judge said wasn't true.
Whether it was appropriate or not, I dunno. It's telly; legally binding telly, but telly all the same.

The right conclusion was reached.

Interesting that the defendant apparently didn't see anything wrong in what she was doing.

Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall|A better terminal emulator]
[image|http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h262/pwhysall/Misc/saveus.png|0|Darwinia||]
Post #277,963
by boxley
3/10/07 1:09:31 PM
Reply
New typical scofflaw, doesnt see anything wrong
with fleecing the rubes.If she was an honest scofflaw she would cheat the cheaters.
thanx,
bill
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep

reach me at [link|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]
     How to piss off Judge Judy - (Bman) - (15) - March 9, 2007, 04:10:06 AM EST
         Day-am! -NT - (imqwerky) - March 9, 2007, 08:32:38 AM EST
         Excellent. - (admin) - March 9, 2007, 10:03:26 AM EST
         You're a theif, get a job! Love it. -NT - (Steve Lowe) - March 9, 2007, 12:29:56 PM EST
         Oooooooooohh ... saw the decision coming, but not the amount -NT - (drewk) - March 9, 2007, 10:20:10 PM EST
         They're both dumbasses. - (static) - (8) - March 10, 2007, 02:39:28 AM EST
             The "Judge" too. - (CRConrad) - (7) - March 10, 2007, 03:27:40 AM EST
                 Take this with a grain of salt. - (static) - (1) - March 10, 2007, 04:40:53 AM EST
                     Sheesh. -NT - (CRConrad) - March 10, 2007, 05:44:41 AM EST
                 That's not what I had a problem with - (drewk) - (4) - March 10, 2007, 09:14:12 AM EST
                     Why? - It was clearly a photo of a 4.9oz phone! :-) - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 10, 2007, 11:09:50 AM EST
                         Its called fraud and it is illegal. - (bepatient) - March 10, 2007, 11:45:37 AM EST
                     Nothing the Judge said wasn't true. - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 10, 2007, 12:24:39 PM EST
                         typical scofflaw, doesnt see anything wrong - (boxley) - March 10, 2007, 01:09:31 PM EST
         My fscking Ghod! - (jb4) - March 10, 2007, 12:04:50 PM EST
         One of her best lines: - (bionerd) - March 10, 2007, 12:19:56 PM EST

Who's got a match?
46 ms