IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Rich people use more of the commons
Great little read from Bill G's dad.

[link|http://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Our-Commonwealth-Accumulated-Fortunes/dp/0807047198|http://www.amazon.co...nes/dp/0807047198]
-----------
The reality is, the concept of, "self made", is a myth. One third of the Fortune 400 inherited their super-wealth. A generation got their start with the GI-Bill that allowed college educations without the crushing debt a collegiate experience demands today. Few have not benefited from the public domain. The Hilton family readily explains that their Hilton Hotel empire could not exist outside an essentially peaceful nation, could not exist with the most basic infrastructures that their facilities need like highways, water, and on and on, state and federal programs funded by everyone, so why should not the same, "everyone", get something back, why should wealth become dynastic? Warren Buffet believes society over values what he does, and readily admits that in most countries, after 30 years his skills would yield him little.

The estate tax does not destroy wealth; no children of the wealthy are on bread lines the day after mom and dad pass away. The book does a brilliant job of debunking the myth that family farms are destroyed by estate taxes or that mom and pop businesses close because of the tax.

When the people that are the wealthiest, when those that control more money per person than the vast majority of the nation are telling you a tax should be kept or even increased, it's probably a good time to listen.




[link|http://www.blackbagops.net|Black Bag Operations Log]

[link|http://www.objectiveclips.com|Artificial Intelligence]

[link|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html|Scrutinizer]
Collapse Edited by tuberculosis Aug. 21, 2007, 06:33:50 AM EDT
Rich people use more of the commons
Great little read from Bill G's dad.

[link|http://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Our-Commonwealth-Accumulated-Fortunes/dp/0807047198|http://www.amazon.co...nes/dp/0807047198]
-----------
The reality is, the concept of, "self made", is a myth. One third of the Fortune 400 inherited their super-wealth. A generation got their start with the GI-Bill that allowed college educations without the crushing debt a collegiate experience demands today. Few have not benefited from the public domain. The Hilton family readily explains that their Hilton Hotel empire could not exist outside an essentially peaceful nation, could not exist with the most basic infrastructures that their facilities need like highways, water, and on and on, state and federal programs funded by everyone, so why should not the same, "everyone", get something back, why should wealth become dynastic? Warren Buffet believes society over values what he does, and readily admits that in most countries, after 30 years his skills would yield him little.

The estate tax does not destroy wealth; no children of the wealthy are on bread lines the day after mom and dad pass away. The book does a brilliant job of debunking the myth that family farms are destroyed by estate taxes or that mom and pop businesses close because of the tax.

When the people that are the wealthiest, when those that control more money per person than the vast majority of the nation are telling you a tax should be kept or even increased, it's probably a good time to listen.




[link|http://www.blackbagops.net|Black Bag Operations Log]

[link|http://www.objectiveclips.com|Artificial Intelligence]

[link|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html|Scrutinizer]
     CRC: Truth/cars link - (Ashton) - (48)
         Excuse me? - (bepatient) - (4)
             Eh? - (Another Scott) - (3)
                 My first take - (bepatient) - (2)
                     Ford had a 500 in the 50s-70s (1957 Fairline 500). - (Another Scott) - (1)
                         Flashback - (jbrabeck)
         Re: CRC: Truth/cars link - (pwhysall) - (42)
             I'll accept alternatives: I ain't The LRPD - (Ashton) - (41)
                 What's wrong with capital-accumulation? - (pwhysall) - (40)
                     Society has costs that have to be borne by someone. - (Another Scott) - (15)
                         50% of the costs are borne by less than 2% of the people - (boxley)
                         Re: Society has costs that have to be borne by someone. - (pwhysall)
                         Consider Microsoft? - (pwhysall)
                         Re: Society has costs that have to be borne by someone. - (pwhysall) - (11)
                             Struck a nerve, did I? - (Another Scott) - (10)
                                 Re: Struck a nerve, did I? - (pwhysall)
                                 please prove point one - (boxley) - (8)
                                     Why 200 years? - (Another Scott) - (7)
                                         Now explain why your examples - (boxley) - (6)
                                             And ask Carnegie about giving back - (bepatient) - (2)
                                                 Thing about Carnegie - (drewk) - (1)
                                                     Standard view of society - (bepatient)
                                             I guess I'm not making myself clear. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                 I dont think you understand economics very well - (boxley)
                                                 Re: I guess I'm not making myself clear. - (pwhysall)
                     Its great to talk about personal freedoms to a point - (bepatient) - (4)
                         No - if they gave it away for parks and museums . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3)
                             Right, those whose free choice wasn't the one you wanted;-) -NT - (bepatient) - (2)
                                 No 'free choice'? Exactly!___when the current math + laws - (Ashton) - (1)
                                     There is a choice - (bepatient)
                     Rich people use more of the commons - (tuberculosis)
                     What's wrong with capital-accumulation? - (Seamus) - (17)
                         tax it once is the only fair method, even the freakin mob - (boxley) - (16)
                             Money is taxed many times - (JayMehaffey) - (15)
                                 it wasnt your money then was it? - (boxley) - (14)
                                     Bah. - (Another Scott) - (5)
                                         couple of points - (boxley)
                                         Taxation affects economic development. - (static) - (3)
                                             Easy - (drewk) - (2)
                                                 Hmm. - (static)
                                                 I don't like that idea much. - (Another Scott)
                                     No, but I'm the one paying - (JayMehaffey)
                                     Wasn't yours before you inherited it either, was it? - (CRConrad) - (6)
                                         If you were willing to flat rate the tax Im with you -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                             Why should I? WTF does one have to do with the other??? -NT - (CRConrad)
                                         Cap Gains tas is lower not by coincidence - (bepatient) - (3)
                                             they are already building big houses they cant sell - (boxley)
                                             Is this *also* a coincidience? - (CRConrad) - (1)
                                                 I'm not coming down on ANY side. - (bepatient)

So does a burning bus.
240 ms