Is this *also* a coincidience?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #289,185

7/17/07 2:31:52 AM

Is this *also* a coincidience?

I point out how you ALWAYs come down on the side of Big Biz against Average Joe, you seem to try to say it ain't so and I'm somehow mistaken... Now it looks like you're coming down on the side of Buddy Rich against Average Joe, but I assume I'm only imagining this, too?

I mean, sheesh, man... WTF is it with you? Are you seriously trying to claim you're ALWAYS "just playing Devil's Advocate"? (It seems it hasn't occurred to you that ALWAYS being His advocate amounts to *actually* arraying yourself in His ranks.)

[link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)

Ah, the Germans: Masters of Convoluted Simplification. — [link|http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1603|Jehovah]

Post #289,210

Picture of bepatient

7/17/07 8:40:00 AM

I'm not coming down on ANY side.

Thats simply the economic truth behind cap gains.

I didn't voice support for it, nor did I voice disdain.

It is what it is.

I already know WTF it is with you. Its been that way around here for years. Glad you could catch up. Have a pow-wow with Ashton for pointers.

Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry._{Adrian Belew}

CRC: Truth/cars link - (Ashton) - (48) - Nov. 4, 2006, 04:18:40 AM EST

Excuse me? - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 4, 2006, 10:44:20 AM EST

Eh? - (Another Scott) - (3) - Nov. 4, 2006, 11:22:52 AM EST

My first take - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 4, 2006, 11:32:15 AM EST

Ford had a 500 in the 50s-70s (1957 Fairline 500). - (Another Scott) - (1) - Nov. 4, 2006, 11:37:42 AM EST

Flashback - (jbrabeck) - Nov. 4, 2006, 01:09:41 PM EST

Re: CRC: Truth/cars link - (pwhysall) - (42) - Nov. 4, 2006, 01:40:54 PM EST

I'll accept alternatives: I ain't The LRPD - (Ashton) - (41) - Nov. 6, 2006, 12:46:22 AM EST

What's wrong with capital-accumulation? - (pwhysall) - (40) - Nov. 6, 2006, 02:43:55 AM EST

Society has costs that have to be borne by someone. - (Another Scott) - (15) - Nov. 6, 2006, 07:27:20 AM EST

50% of the costs are borne by less than 2% of the people - (boxley) - Nov. 6, 2006, 08:01:18 AM EST

Re: Society has costs that have to be borne by someone. - (pwhysall) - Nov. 6, 2006, 08:12:46 AM EST

Consider Microsoft? - (pwhysall) - Nov. 6, 2006, 08:13:05 AM EST

Re: Society has costs that have to be borne by someone. - (pwhysall) - (11) - Nov. 6, 2006, 08:16:06 AM EST

Struck a nerve, did I? - (Another Scott) - (10) - Nov. 6, 2006, 08:49:01 AM EST

Re: Struck a nerve, did I? - (pwhysall) - Nov. 6, 2006, 09:02:15 AM EST

please prove point one - (boxley) - (8) - Nov. 6, 2006, 09:45:19 AM EST

Why 200 years? - (Another Scott) - (7) - Nov. 6, 2006, 10:45:17 AM EST

Now explain why your examples - (boxley) - (6) - Nov. 6, 2006, 12:05:11 PM EST

And ask Carnegie about giving back - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2006, 12:36:07 PM EST

Thing about Carnegie - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2006, 08:54:00 PM EST

Standard view of society - (bepatient) - Nov. 7, 2006, 08:48:30 AM EST

I guess I'm not making myself clear. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2006, 12:59:21 PM EST

I dont think you understand economics very well - (boxley) - Nov. 6, 2006, 01:32:13 PM EST

Re: I guess I'm not making myself clear. - (pwhysall) - Nov. 6, 2006, 01:39:12 PM EST

Its great to talk about personal freedoms to a point - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2006, 12:42:54 PM EST

No - if they gave it away for parks and museums . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2006, 12:57:46 PM EST

Right, those whose free choice wasn't the one you wanted;-) -NT - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2006, 01:08:29 PM EST

No 'free choice'? Exactly!___when the current math + laws - (Ashton) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2006, 06:25:32 PM EST

There is a choice - (bepatient) - Nov. 7, 2006, 08:44:35 AM EST

Rich people use more of the commons - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:33:50 AM EDT

What's wrong with capital-accumulation? - (Seamus) - (17) - July 15, 2007, 11:07:13 AM EDT

tax it once is the only fair method, even the freakin mob - (boxley) - (16) - July 15, 2007, 11:13:40 AM EDT

Money is taxed many times - (JayMehaffey) - (15) - July 15, 2007, 01:24:32 PM EDT

it wasnt your money then was it? - (boxley) - (14) - July 15, 2007, 04:29:38 PM EDT

Bah. - (Another Scott) - (5) - July 15, 2007, 05:33:52 PM EDT

couple of points - (boxley) - July 15, 2007, 06:26:26 PM EDT

Taxation affects economic development. - (static) - (3) - July 15, 2007, 10:03:08 PM EDT

Easy - (drewk) - (2) - July 16, 2007, 10:20:42 PM EDT

Hmm. - (static) - July 16, 2007, 11:01:58 PM EDT

I don't like that idea much. - (Another Scott) - July 17, 2007, 07:03:03 AM EDT

No, but I'm the one paying - (JayMehaffey) - July 15, 2007, 11:19:18 PM EDT

Wasn't yours before you inherited it either, was it? - (CRConrad) - (6) - July 16, 2007, 03:20:23 AM EDT

If you were willing to flat rate the tax Im with you -NT - (boxley) - (1) - July 16, 2007, 09:12:02 AM EDT

Why should I? WTF does one have to do with the other??? -NT - (CRConrad) - July 17, 2007, 02:33:08 AM EDT

Cap Gains tas is lower not by coincidence - (bepatient) - (3) - July 16, 2007, 09:55:50 AM EDT

they are already building big houses they cant sell - (boxley) - July 16, 2007, 10:42:12 AM EDT

Is this *also* a coincidience? - (CRConrad) - (1) - July 17, 2007, 02:31:52 AM EDT

I'm not coming down on ANY side. - (bepatient) - July 17, 2007, 08:40:00 AM EDT

Don’t look at me in that tone of voice!
72 ms