![New](/static/images/lrpd.gif)
No 'free choice'? Exactly!___when the current math + laws
guarantee that fewer and fewer individuals shall control more and more of the aggregated wealth 'of the nation'.
Already: the very-few indeed determine the fate of the 300M.
And: the representatives who might alter that fact themselves, are thralls of the Thanes.
(not You, Thane)
They will not attempt to repair their bogus funding, thus ownership. Period.
It's broken, Jim
Only question is if.. we wait until the [yan Tipping Point\ufffd?] madness of the angry-mob renders temporary or permanent anarchy. And with all those keen new hi-tech implements of destruction..
Your freedom to purchase favorable lawmakers-thus-laws ends..
when I wake up and realize that Nobody 'earns' $300M/year except in an oligarchy. They steal it - by any of 100 synonyms.
First: we must get back actual 'representation of the people'; then see if anyone will try voting again. These representatives are not Ours.
If the ballots continue to fail at inducing self-reform of the Purchased nonrepresentatives, as they have to date: there are lots of bullets and testy psychotic Muricans appear to own a huge share of those. Just itchin - else why own so many and fondle them so often?
It's broken. We don't have a lot of years to get back to being a sorta-Republic, y'know? There are today, only barely-peeped primordial forces arrayed against our farces - we'll change or die. Maybe die anyway - but with a whimper, too?
'Libertarian', eh?
Is that the same as , I'm Alright, Jack?