IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Great. So starvation and plague is mandatory.
And our 'great' economy can only take care of the wealthy. These 'entitlements' are NOT luxuries for the bulk of the people.

What you are saying is, we're doomed, and that revolution and death is coming.

Remember this; starving and hopeless people are NOT nice. When the choices are plague and/or famine and fighting for relief, the American people are not likely to sit in their homes and quietly let family members suffer and die. The wealthy simply don't want to see this reality; it's not PERSONAL for them. They see what they want to see - and what they see is that concentrating wealth at the top, in their own hands, is a moral act that helps the lower classes. You know - like the slaveholders putting slaves in poorly made, drafty housing because it was somehow 'good for' tuberculosis.

Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 
New There's another way.
If Social Security and Medicare were treated as a safety net rather than part of everyone's retirement, then the problem would be a lot smaller.

Of course, the problem would be a lot smaller too if everyone didn't live so long. If/when our population stabilizes, it should become more managable if people can and do work a substantial portion of their lives. The American Dream of retiring at 65 and living to be 90 isn't economically sustainable under the present system.

There's a fundamental unfairness about the taxation of the present system. There should be more means-testing and the taxable income cap should be raised if they really want to get the system under control. As it is, I think we all know that nothing will be done unless there's a crisis, and when that crisis comes there will probably be a lot of other problems that have to be dealt with, so even then I wouldn't expect big changes.

A solution that may present itself, and one that doesn't have as much risk politically (compared to overt cuts or overt tax increases) is: They decide to end automatic COLAs, and inflation is allowed to go to 7-10+% again, then that 20-30 year problem suddenly starts to look like less of a problem (future dollars are much cheaper). Of course, it would be a disaster for the economy, but hey...

:-(

Cheers,
Scott.
New It has nothing to do with class
Rich people are not causing it to happen. The wealthy can take care of themselves (and can't opt out of these mandatory government payments, even if they wanted).

Concentration of wealth is a separate issue. Not as disastrous to the economy as much as it is an issue of social divisiveness.

Modifications must be made. If their not, they we will be dealing with those "not nice" starving and hopeless people.

I can only tell you that I have not, at any time, expected to receive anything from SS or Medicare. I have expected it to collapse and have made all my retirement plans accordingly.
Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
New Oh, aye.
They are not causing SS to have a limited lifespan - but they ARE straining the social fabric of this country by actively concentrating all money at 'the top'. The poor do NOT have the discretionary cash to put away enough to live at even poverty levels after they 'retire'/become unemployable. The wealthy DO. Lessee - who are gung-ho about scrapping (not revamping, not making ancillary) sabotaging or raiding SS? Let me give you a hint: it AIN'T the poor. No, the poor aren't hungry enough to COMPLETELY suicide in their old age for 'bread today'. Not yet.

Not YET.

Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 
New Regardless of who is trying to "insert your verb here"
this doesn't change the simple fact that, in current form, SS will not survive.

Scrap it or fix it are the options.

And as I said, the wealthy, who don't need it, can't opt out of the benefits. >that in itself< would be a start.

Changing the funding structure would also be necessary. Investing in something that compounds the growth at more than 2% is necessary...or it will die.

Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
     It's going to suck when we have to pay the piper - (lincoln) - (43)
         You must be a Republican - (bepatient) - (33)
             And interest on the National Debt is not mandatory? - (lincoln) - (25)
                 What he's done in the past 2 years - (bepatient) - (24)
                     So raise the cutoff. -NT - (Silverlock)
                     Beep says: - (lincoln) - (17)
                         Check your numbers - (bepatient) - (16)
                             US budget is nearly useless - (JayMehaffey) - (15)
                                 Nice use of statistics. - (bepatient) - (14)
                                     Wot, no sarcasm sign? - (warmachine) - (12)
                                         You seem to not understand - (bepatient) - (11)
                                             Who says so? Congress. Who will demonstrate if they renege? - (warmachine) - (10)
                                                 It is not that simple - (bepatient) - (2)
                                                     Then explain it! -NT - (warmachine) - (1)
                                                         Its not relevent, so no. -NT - (bepatient)
                                                 Everybody who has paid into SS. - (imric) - (6)
                                                     Thank you for doing what bepatient has refused - (warmachine) - (5)
                                                         What was the point? - (bepatient) - (1)
                                                             A counter argument, at last - (warmachine)
                                                         Heehee. - (imric) - (2)
                                                             Even the middle aged? - (warmachine) - (1)
                                                                 Yup. -NT - (imric)
                                     Sigh - (JayMehaffey)
                     Great. So starvation and plague is mandatory. - (imric) - (4)
                         There's another way. - (Another Scott)
                         It has nothing to do with class - (bepatient) - (2)
                             Oh, aye. - (imric) - (1)
                                 Regardless of who is trying to "insert your verb here" - (bepatient)
             Not quite. - (imric) - (6)
                 Proposals versus message - (bepatient)
                 SS is a scam (giant Ponzi scheme) -NT - (tonytib) - (4)
                     That HAS benefited many worthy people. - (imric) - (3)
                         While sarcastic - (bepatient) - (2)
                             no one has the balls to declare it old folks welfare - (boxley) - (1)
                                 'Doesn\ufffdt anything socialistic make you want to throw up? - - (Ashton)
         welcome to 1980 - (boxley)
         Need Medicare or Social Security? Run! Get out while... etc - (warmachine)
         I have an actual *cough* solution - (Ashton) - (4)
             So your suggestion to solve the 2025 spend crisis is - (bepatient) - (3)
                 no, when the elder patient asks a doc for a script - (boxley) - (1)
                     Well, he won't be doing that up here - (jake123)
                 A little reductio goes well with the - (Ashton)
         economics according to the brothers Grimm - (cforde) - (1)
             Some of those are interesting - (bepatient)

Let's get this party started...
92 ms