IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Regional/World Conflict Forum / Obligatgory nit-pick
Post #25,699
by mhuber
1/25/02 10:14:24 AM
Reply
New Obligatgory nit-pick
There are no male cows. There are male cattle.

Cows are adult female cattle.

There are an insane number of different terms for cattle of various genders and former genders and life stages, most of which I have heard and forgotten, but the generic term for the animal is "cattle".
----
"You don't have to be right - just use bolded upper case" - annon.
Post #25,829
by dmarker2
1/26/02 12:38:35 AM
Reply
New Re: Of course ...


But what appeared was a lot nicer than what I first wrote :-)

But tks for the clarification.

Doug
     The Taliban are NOT the Afghan National Army - (Mike) - (43) - Jan. 24, 2002, 11:41:40 PM EST
         Re: Male-cow-dung!!! - (dmarker2) - (42) - Jan. 25, 2002, 08:05:25 AM EST
             So what does or doesn't count as a national army? - (marlowe) - Jan. 25, 2002, 08:55:10 AM EST
             Obligatgory nit-pick - (mhuber) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2002, 10:14:24 AM EST
                 Re: Of course ... - (dmarker2) - Jan. 26, 2002, 12:38:35 AM EST
             Hmmmmm - (Mike) - (38) - Jan. 25, 2002, 10:42:28 AM EST
                 Simple. - (Brandioch) - (26) - Jan. 25, 2002, 02:28:12 PM EST
                     Yes you are - (Mike) - (25) - Jan. 26, 2002, 12:14:15 AM EST
                         That is so amusing. - (Brandioch) - (24) - Jan. 26, 2002, 01:09:34 PM EST
                             Have to give him McVeigh.... - (bepatient) - Jan. 26, 2002, 02:34:20 PM EST
                             For Christ's sake do some research. You embarrass yourself. - (Mike) - (22) - Jan. 26, 2002, 10:45:51 PM EST
                                 It is not I who cannot read. - (Brandioch) - (21) - Jan. 27, 2002, 12:04:24 PM EST
                                     Response - (Mike) - (20) - Jan. 27, 2002, 08:45:20 PM EST
                                         No particular need to go farther - (Ric Locke) - (19) - Jan. 27, 2002, 10:12:33 PM EST
                                             I think you misread Brandioch. - (Another Scott) - (9) - Jan. 27, 2002, 11:50:03 PM EST
                                                 Nice post - (Mike) - Jan. 28, 2002, 04:29:21 PM EST
                                                 Hey Scott. - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Jan. 28, 2002, 02:03:09 PM EST
                                                     So crack dealers are POWs when arrested, right? - (bepatient) - (4) - Jan. 28, 2002, 04:51:07 PM EST
                                                         Start a new thread. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Jan. 28, 2002, 05:00:31 PM EST
                                                             Go ahead. We'd probably agree on its failure. - (bepatient) - Jan. 28, 2002, 05:11:18 PM EST
                                                         So.. where would the War on the Constitution go? -NT - (Ashton) - (1) - Jan. 28, 2002, 05:05:10 PM EST
                                                             As a plank in the Republican Platform I suspect. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 29, 2002, 02:08:19 PM EST
                                                     N.C. eh? - (Ashton) - (1) - Jan. 28, 2002, 05:00:13 PM EST
                                                         Have family in Asheville. - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 29, 2002, 02:12:05 PM EST
                                             I have a request. - (Brandioch) - Jan. 28, 2002, 01:30:21 AM EST
                                             I have to disagree as well.... - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - Jan. 28, 2002, 08:57:33 AM EST
                                                 Minor point - POW must be let go when War is over. - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Jan. 28, 2002, 09:39:36 PM EST
                                                     But.. how long might a War on Evil last? Hmmm? - (Ashton) - Jan. 28, 2002, 10:45:46 PM EST
                                             Psych 101A now? - (Ashton) - (4) - Jan. 28, 2002, 02:49:14 PM EST
                                                 dis en zhin oo' os ness - (Ric Locke) - (3) - Jan. 28, 2002, 09:06:05 PM EST
                                                     Ah well.. on That level - - (Ashton) - (2) - Jan. 28, 2002, 10:12:31 PM EST
                                                         Oh, absolutely. - (Ric Locke) - (1) - Jan. 29, 2002, 07:44:45 PM EST
                                                             Yes, I think it is that arcane.. - (Ashton) - Jan. 30, 2002, 06:41:20 AM EST
                 Trouble with imagining that redefinitions work - (Ashton) - Jan. 25, 2002, 04:40:10 PM EST
                 Re: Western nicities vs tribal reality - (dmarker2) - (9) - Jan. 26, 2002, 12:52:01 AM EST
                     Disagree - (Mike) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2002, 01:58:08 AM EST
                         Geneva Convention, Article 4, subsection 3. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2002, 01:51:50 PM EST
                             Theres that loose definition again. - (bepatient) - Jan. 26, 2002, 02:35:56 PM EST
                     Re: Western nicities vs tribal reality - (gtall) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2002, 07:18:23 AM EST
                         Re: Western nicities vs tribal reality - (dmarker2) - (4) - Jan. 27, 2002, 06:48:03 AM EST
                             Re: Western nicities vs tribal reality - (gtall) - (3) - Jan. 27, 2002, 08:19:20 AM EST
                                 As you've broadened the arena, maybe I can agree - (Ashton) - (2) - Jan. 28, 2002, 03:10:04 PM EST
                                     Re: As you've broadened the arena, maybe I can agree - (gtall) - (1) - Jan. 29, 2002, 07:27:03 AM EST
                                         Cackle.. cackle.. Ulp!.. chomp.. - (Ashton) - Jan. 30, 2002, 07:08:55 AM EST

I have a cunning plan...
89 ms