Would you leave me out of your paranoid delusions?

"So the actual content of the Geneva Convention is irrelevant, as are prevailing interpretations in International Law, unless they can be used as a lever to pry GWB out of office."

Hey, I've quoted DIRECTLY from the Geneva Convention.

Verbatim.

If you have a problem with that it is because >YOU< have a problem.

I've noticed that you haven't supplied any references to contradict my position.

Just claims that my position isn't valid because I must have an ulterior motive.

Now, what debate falacy does that fall under?