IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
News Picks Forum
/
Nice segue to Tom Toles 5/18/2006 cartoon. 27 kB .img
Post #255,870
by
Another Scott
5/18/06 10:24:24 AM
Reply
Nice segue to Tom Toles 5/18/2006 cartoon. 27 kB .img
[image|http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinion/ssi/images/Toles/c_05182006_520.gif|0|The Terrorists Hate Our Freedom|437|520]
Cheers,
Scott.
Post #255,877
by
GBert
5/18/06 11:25:38 AM
Reply
awesome, i hadn't seen that !
Have whatever values you have. That's what America is for.
You don't need George Bush for that.
So USA Today is full of it, I guess?
- (
bepatient
)
- (30)
- May 16, 2006, 05:48:47 PM EDT
Or 2 of 3 carriers are.
-NT
- (
Silverlock
)
- May 16, 2006, 06:18:47 PM EDT
Definitely calls for an investigation
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (22)
- May 16, 2006, 06:51:46 PM EDT
its fear of lawsuits, their denials are very carefully
- (
boxley
)
- (21)
- May 16, 2006, 08:11:37 PM EDT
I did notice that.... ( && Nacchio)
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (4)
- May 17, 2006, 09:37:51 AM EDT
Non-denial denials anyone?
- (
Silverlock
)
- (3)
- May 17, 2006, 11:17:37 AM EDT
Lawyers bill by the minute.... You expected a quick answer?
-NT
- (
jbrabeck
)
- (1)
- May 17, 2006, 11:45:58 AM EDT
These lawyers are probably internal counsel or on retainer
- (
drewk
)
- May 17, 2006, 11:50:57 AM EDT
Lawyers bill by the minute.... You expected a quick answer?
-NT
- (
jbrabeck
)
- May 17, 2006, 11:46:16 AM EDT
So you think there is a legal distinction
- (
bepatient
)
- (15)
- May 17, 2006, 04:24:57 PM EDT
Sure, leave it to the lawyers to have one.
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- (14)
- May 17, 2006, 04:39:12 PM EDT
you think they want to defend that
- (
bepatient
)
- (13)
- May 17, 2006, 04:53:06 PM EDT
I wouldn't either, but IANAL.
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- (2)
- May 18, 2006, 01:15:44 PM EDT
s/and/in/
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (1)
- May 18, 2006, 06:22:47 AM EDT
Thanks! You are right.
-NT
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- May 18, 2006, 01:17:06 PM EDT
Well, those comments wouldn't go before a Jury, would they?
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (1)
- May 17, 2006, 05:59:47 PM EDT
The EFF v. AT&T case? That was filed on 1/31/2006.
- (
Another Scott
)
- May 17, 2006, 08:02:03 PM EDT
They won't need to defend anything
- (
Silverlock
)
- (7)
- May 18, 2006, 09:13:06 AM EDT
"If the president does it, it's not illegal"
- (
GBert
)
- (2)
- May 18, 2006, 10:17:28 AM EDT
Nice segue to Tom Toles 5/18/2006 cartoon. 27 kB .img
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- May 18, 2006, 10:24:24 AM EDT
awesome, i hadn't seen that !
-NT
- (
GBert
)
- May 18, 2006, 11:25:38 AM EDT
permits no violations of securities law, does not
- (
boxley
)
- May 18, 2006, 11:34:45 AM EDT
Yeah, right.
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (2)
- May 18, 2006, 01:05:46 PM EDT
the purpose of a presidential finding is to cover
- (
boxley
)
- May 18, 2006, 01:39:47 PM EDT
Your point is the most valid
- (
bepatient
)
- May 18, 2006, 03:31:40 PM EDT
One other possibility...
- (
jb4
)
- (3)
- May 17, 2006, 06:13:56 PM EDT
Huh? I was under the impression, this IS "Carnivore". DYMV?
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (2)
- May 18, 2006, 06:31:32 AM EDT
Not supposed to be...
- (
jb4
)
- May 18, 2006, 02:29:04 PM EDT
No, Carnivore is Dead... *BUT*...
- (
folkert
)
- May 18, 2006, 04:13:37 PM EDT
Now Wired is into the act....
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (1)
- May 17, 2006, 06:19:29 PM EDT
CCCP redux.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- May 18, 2006, 09:41:35 AM EDT
i
we
they
.org
We fly with a sort of irrational confidence.
147 ms