IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Mysterious dupe.
Ignore.

I didn't double click or anything, though.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Expand Edited by pwhysall May 1, 2006, 06:47:18 PM EDT
New whaddya mean? Ady has bin around fer ages
I tend to side with him on this one. Netscape autodefaults to netscape search.
thanx,
bill
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New Things are different once you've been found to have a Monop.
Or at least they should be....

In this case, it depends on how Microsoft does it and how easy it is to change. Gryg makes a good point that most machines stay with the default settings. We also know that MS is very jealous of Google's marketshare in search (and advertising) and they're throwing money at the problem to try to cut Google down to size. There are reasons to be very suspicious of Microsoft's plans here. They shouldn't be allowed to unfairly crush Google through bundling the way they killed Netscape.

My gut tells me that this is an important issue for Google (and Yahoo for that matter). In an ideal world, it wouldn't be decided in the courts (because MS would have been broken up long ago). When Vista starts up, it should ask for the user's choice for default search engine when it asks for network settings and the like.

I fear that if it goes to court it'll be 5-10 years before there's any finality and by that time either Google will be dead or Microsoft will be broken up making any court decision moot.

My $0.02.

Cheers,
Scott.
New so if there was no default then....
by the logic above

most users couldn't search


would that be better

I'd guess most of them have no idea what the box is for
I see mine punching in google or yahoo all the time

A
Play I Some Music w/ Papa Andy
Saturday 8 PM - 11 PM ET
All Night Rewind 11 PM - 5 PM
Reggae, African and Caribbean Music
[link|http://wxxe.org|Tune In]
New Not quite
cuz everyone knows how to google or yahoo, which they would continue to do. But if they have to change something to do so, they'll just use whatever is the default.
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort. (Herm Albright)
New Some Info
1) if they go to google and are using IE7 a big red arrow from google
comes up pointing to the search box and telling them they can change the
default to google

2) as I stated before, if they are going to google or yahoo or wherever
then they are not using the box for anything (which if the users are as
ignorant as most of the posts in this thread imply then that if exactly
what the box is "used" for)

A
Play I Some Music w/ Papa Andy
Saturday 8 PM - 11 PM ET
All Night Rewind 11 PM - 5 PM
Reggae, African and Caribbean Music
[link|http://wxxe.org|Tune In]
New Irrelevant.
It's all about the law. What users *can* do doesn't matter.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New This deserves to be framed and hung
"What users *can* do doesn't matter."

Indeed.

------

179. I will not outsource core functions.
--
[link|http://omega.med.yale.edu/~pcy5/misc/overlord2.htm|.]

New ?
Users *can* just install Firefox.

Users *can* just install Linux.

Users *can* just buy a Mac.

I'm not sure I get your point.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Wasn't it your point to begin with?
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New Indeed
But I'm not convinced it's the point that Ark took away from the post.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New None of my points are very flattering
It does not matter that people are lazy and stupid
The law will fix it.


Or, it doe not matter that users can now do much more than they used to. We must have a law to ensure the ideal state, when those users can do _everything_ in the best possible way.

There might be a couple more.

------

179. I will not outsource core functions.
--
[link|http://omega.med.yale.edu/~pcy5/misc/overlord2.htm|.]

New You've missed my point entirely.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Better idea.
First time IE starts, a dialog box pops up with major search engines, asking user to select one for the default search.
When somebody asks you to trade your freedoms for security, it isn't your security they're talking about.
New Better better idea.
Make sure it's a multi-select, and not a drop-down (with MSN pre-selected, natch).

Otherwise the user will just hit "OK" and be done with it. They should have to pick from a list before continuing.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New Go read up about having a monopoly
And what you can and cannot do once you have one.

While it's not illegal to have a monopoly in one or more markets, it's highly not legal to use that monopoly to leverage your entry or marketshare in another.

In this case, MSIE having a default search option of MSN is leverage the OS/Browser monopoly in order to increase marketshare in the search market.

Google and Firefox are not at all in the same position (Firefox doesn't own Google, and doesn't have any kind of monopoly).

Just saying "it's configurable" is no defence.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Come on, Andy, not even you are that dense
Matriculated at the BeeP School of Applied Rhetoric, did you? I see you mastered in Reductio ad Absurdum. Congratulations....
jb4
"So don't pay attention to the approval ratings that say 68% of Americans disapprove of the job this man is doing. I ask you this, does that not also logically mean that 68% approve of the job he's not doing? Think about it. I haven't."
Stephen Colbert, at the White House Correspondent's Dinner 29Apr06
     New Microsoft Browser Raises Google's Hackles - (bluke) - (37)
         Old school MS tactic - (JayMehaffey)
         Open letter to Google: This surprises you how? luv, jb4 -NT - (jb4)
         Google Whines about nothing - (andread) - (30)
             Microsoft doesn't care that you know how to change it. - (Andrew Grygus)
             Re: Google Whines about nothing - (pwhysall)
             Mysterious dupe. - (pwhysall) - (16)
                 whaddya mean? Ady has bin around fer ages - (boxley) - (15)
                     Things are different once you've been found to have a Monop. - (Another Scott) - (14)
                         so if there was no default then.... - (andread) - (13)
                             Not quite - (jbrabeck) - (10)
                                 Some Info - (andread) - (9)
                                     Irrelevant. - (pwhysall) - (6)
                                         This deserves to be framed and hung - (Arkadiy) - (5)
                                             ? - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                                 Wasn't it your point to begin with? -NT - (drewk) - (1)
                                                     Indeed - (pwhysall)
                                                 None of my points are very flattering - (Arkadiy) - (1)
                                                     You've missed my point entirely. -NT - (pwhysall)
                                     Better idea. - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                                         Better better idea. - (admin)
                             Go read up about having a monopoly - (pwhysall)
                             Come on, Andy, not even you are that dense - (jb4)
             So, Andrea Dear, you *still* claim not to be an M$ $hill...? -NT - (CRConrad) - (10)
                 Burn the Witch! Burn The Witch! - (altmann) - (2)
                     Bullpucky. - (CRConrad) - (1)
                         Another Memo from the Chuckles at the DFSS - (andread)
                 Welcome to the 21st century, Chuckles -NT - (andread) - (6)
                     You mean, where the new boss is the same as the old boss... - (CRConrad) - (5)
                         To be replaced with what? - (andread) - (4)
                             I work for a largish firm - (boxley) - (3)
                                 Oh, jeez... Remedy is pretty bad. - (admin) - (2)
                                     At least it's not Track-It. -NT - (inthane-chan)
                                     not a useful web interface :-) -NT - (boxley)
         OEMs have control, FWIW - (altmann) - (1)
             Microsoft would like to change that -NT - (ben_tilly)
         Turn about is fair play? - (ChrisR) - (1)
             Like we did with the "SCO" search term? -NT - (folkert)

If there were bombs.
171 ms