IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Phil vs Pentagon
Ah, but the Defense Department described white phosphorus as a chemical weapon back in the day (the day, of course, being when the wicked Saddam was employing it):
IRAQ'S POSSIBLE EMPLOYMENT OF PHOSPHOROUS CHEMICAL WEAPONS -- IN LATE FEBRUARY 1991, FOLLOWING THE COALITION FORCES' OVERWHELMING VICTORY OVER IRAQ, KURDISH REBELS STEPPED UP THEIR STRUGGLE AGAINST IRAQI FORCES IN NORTHERN IRAQ. DURING THE BRUTAL CRACKDOWN THAT FOLLOWED THE KURDISH UPRISING, IRAQI FORCES LOYAL TO PRESIDENT SADDAM ((HUSSEIN)) MAY HAVE POSSIBLY USED WHITE PHOSPHOROUS (WP) CHEMICAL WEAPONS AGAINST KURDISH REBELS AND THE POPULACE IN ERBIL (GEOCOORD:3412N/04401E) (VICINITY OF IRANIAN BORDER) AND DOHUK (GEOCOORD:3652N/04301E) (VICINITY OF IRAQI BORDER) PROVINCES, IRAQ. THE WP CHEMICAL WAS DELIVERED BY ARTILLERY ROUNDS AND HELICOPTER GUNSHIPS (NO FURTHER INFORMATION AT THIS TIME)
[link|http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/declassdocs/dia/19950901/950901_22431050_91r.html|source]

[link|http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/21/phosphorus-chemical/|more context]

Back in your hole, wanker. See you next month.
Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist.
New you mean when I was calling in rounds of WP to Mark
and HE to tune em up it twas a war crime? I think I have a shit load of fellow criminals in that case. Anyone who saw hot spots between WW1 and Today.
thanx,
bill
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
     White Phosphorus, hype vs reality - (marlowe) - (20)
         Phil vs Pentagon - (rcareaga) - (1)
             you mean when I was calling in rounds of WP to Mark - (boxley)
         Looks like I hit a nerve! - (tuberculosis) - (17)
             One nit - (bepatient) - (12)
                 staggering losses - (rcareaga) - (1)
                     I see - (bepatient)
                 Nit again... - (Simon_Jester) - (4)
                     Point taken - (bepatient) - (3)
                         Big nit - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                             I should know better. - (bepatient) - (1)
                                 Right. Not by a factor of 10. - (ben_tilly)
                 I was talking about monetary cost. - (tuberculosis) - (3)
                     Cost of containment is $380 billion so invading was cheaper - (boxley) - (2)
                         Um, box...did you read that article?? - (Simon_Jester)
                         I hope their analysis is better than their OS analysis. - (Another Scott)
                 To the sufficiently staggerable, anything is staggering. - (marlowe)
             staggering loss of materiel maybe - (boxley) - (3)
                 Add in economic casualties - start with your kids - (tuberculosis) - (2)
                     nice slide from under your prognostications of doom :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                         Who needs prognostications - just look around. -NT - (Ashton)

When The Wall fell, I had a basement full of homebrew and a freezer full of venison here in The Land of the Free. All quite legal, unless I committed capitalism, in which case it becomes felonious.
75 ms