IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New ..and not a single chopper hit with a missile.
I got two questions:

1) Does the hero get the girl?

2) Do the horses expolde when they crash?
----
"You don't have to be right - just use bolded upper case" - annon.
New Beauty of Tolkien..
No gurrlz. Wait, that didn't come out right: yes there be elfin and elvin Princesses but.. no soap operas about hobbits gettin into pants by method XZ-143-beta, nor the other usual. ie Nobody Gets the Girl or for the other half: Nobody gets the guy/hobbit/elf or Gollum.

There's just fuckin No Sex :( and it Works :-)
er, don't try this at home, kids.



Ashton
New Really?
Sam gets Rosie. There is a fine Hobbit romance.

Aaragorn gets Arwen. Tolkien isn't above a little cross-racial relationship or two.

For purely human romance, Éowyn gets over her love for Aragorn and gets Faramir.

Legolas loses his heart, OK that is to the sea and not a person, but still he does.

Heck, even Gollum gets his heart's desire, the Ring, and keeps it to the end of his days. (OK, that isn't as long as Gollum might have wished...)

Now the romance is not central to the book. Doing romances isn't exactly Tolkein's strong point. Wistful longing and deep devotion are more his style. There is a .. gap .. between feeling and lifelong marriage that he doesn't fill in. But still there were romances there.

Cheers,
Ben
New Just a tad bit of understatement...

Heck, even Gollum gets his heart's desire, the Ring, and keeps it to the end of his days. (OK, that isn't as long as Gollum might have wished...)
New Ya think? :-)
New Romance yes.. just no gratuitous scenes
Doin It One More Time, for the voyeurs.. nor a Hobbit worryin.. worryin.. is mine Bigger?? ... enough? Will she respect me in the morning? Hey check out the boobs on \ufffdowyn! yada yada.

ie *What* exactly would have sex-onlooking done for these books? Obviously JRR thought: nada. I think he got that right. Older kids could fill in their own imaginations (and who could stop them!) - but to younger ones, it er wouldn't come up..

And after all, what's the most erotic part of the body?














Yup - the mind. 'Romance' was about developing that larger aspect so perfectly Missing in the 2.8-minute fuck in 3-D color with body double - y'know?

(Hell, maybe JRR was prescient about the obvious direction of mass media.. for all I know he might even have despised the fact that Sex Sells [now.. absolutely Everything]. That's just a guess, of course.)

Those who can get off only on the explicit.. are doomed to endless reruns of Bo Derek on that mind projector. Cackle.. glorp.


:-\ufffd



A.
     LOTR apprehension - (Silverlock) - (31)
         let me know, I want to see it but am afiered of the - (boxley) - (2)
             Re: let me know, I want to see it but am afiered of the - (folkert) - (1)
                 He was effectively younger than that - (ben_tilly)
         Me too. - (inthane-chan)
         Saw an interview on The Daily Show last night - (drewk)
         Re: LOTR apprehension - (wharris2)
         NY Times review. - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
             The fanboys are drooling. - (inthane-chan)
         Couple of 5 year olds watching the LOTR commercial- - (Silverlock)
         Re: LOTR a no spoiler review... - (folkert) - (11)
             Re: LOTR a no spoiler review... - (admin) - (2)
                 Re: LOTR a no spoiler review... - (pwhysall) - (1)
                     Ya mean ya didnt singem to yer lil feller? -NT - (boxley)
             Elron... - (admin) - (5)
                 Hugo Weaving - (Meerkat) - (4)
                     Special place in my heart for that Matrix character... - (admin) - (3)
                         Good point! - (Meerkat) - (2)
                             Now there's an idea... -NT - (admin)
                             ROFL! - (static)
             No Bombadil? I'll wait for video -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                 NOOOOO.....no no no no no no - (folkert)
         Just go back from seeing it - (JayMehaffey) - (7)
             Pretty much accords with my fav local movie critic, - (Ashton) - (6)
                 ..and not a single chopper hit with a missile. - (mhuber) - (5)
                     Beauty of Tolkien.. - (Ashton) - (4)
                         Really? - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                             Just a tad bit of understatement... - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                                 Ya think? :-) -NT - (ben_tilly)
                             Romance yes.. just no gratuitous scenes - (Ashton)
         Re: LOTR apprehension - (Arkadiy)
         Grrrr. - (admin)

If you realize that this is the result of 35 years of continuous development across a wide range of compute platforms, there's a certain sense to it. It's internally consistent with its development history. Not that it doesn't suck.
117 ms