Anyone interested in the predictive power of dreams? - (SignorMonsanto) - (31) - March 16, 2005, 10:01:33 PM EST
         dreams can be predictive retrospectally - (boxley) - March 16, 2005, 10:52:30 PM EST
         Count me in as a believer - (bionerd) - (28) - March 17, 2005, 10:49:48 AM EST
             Think critically about it. - (pwhysall) - (18) - March 17, 2005, 11:58:04 AM EST
                 I knew someone would bring that up - (bionerd) - (1) - March 17, 2005, 01:27:12 PM EST
                     ** applause ** - (drewk) - March 17, 2005, 05:16:51 PM EST
                 Scientists go bump in the night . . - (Andrew Grygus) - March 17, 2005, 02:05:19 PM EST
                 You seem to be reality challenged - (ben_tilly) - (9) - March 17, 2005, 05:45:11 PM EST
                     Eh? - (pwhysall) - March 18, 2005, 01:33:10 AM EST
                     Ah.. a fav Windmill - (Ashton) - March 18, 2005, 05:11:10 AM EST
                     Bio*GEEK*? - (bionerd) - (6) - March 18, 2005, 10:25:58 AM EST
                         Re: Bio*GEEK*? - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Aug. 21, 2007, 12:44:19 PM EDT
                             ICLRPD^3 (new thread) - (Steve Lowe) - March 18, 2005, 11:45:30 AM EST
                         Gah, sorry. I use nerd/geek interchangeably - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 18, 2005, 03:52:44 PM EST
                             Not to worry - (bionerd) - March 18, 2005, 04:53:53 PM EST
                             Couldn't speak for the east... - (inthane-chan) - (1) - March 21, 2005, 05:00:10 PM EST
                                 And in the UK, neither have particularly +ve connotations. -NT - (pwhysall) - March 21, 2005, 05:02:08 PM EST
                 Look at Scott's post in the science forum - (bionerd) - (4) - March 18, 2005, 10:49:47 AM EST
                     The paranormal suffers from lack of explanation - (warmachine) - (1) - March 18, 2005, 11:39:36 AM EST
                         Lack of explanation is a non-issue - (ben_tilly) - March 18, 2005, 03:57:44 PM EST
                     OT: To do a Linky - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 19, 2005, 11:46:39 AM EST
                         Don't forget option 3 - (ben_tilly) - March 19, 2005, 11:47:02 AM EST
             You may be ignoring negatives - (warmachine) - (8) - March 17, 2005, 06:45:06 PM EST
                 Sure, any of those could be true - (bionerd) - (7) - March 18, 2005, 10:31:59 AM EST
                     I prefer 'what is likely and possible?' - (warmachine) - (1) - March 18, 2005, 11:07:37 AM EST
                         'how cause generates effect' - (Ashton) - March 19, 2005, 06:13:28 AM EST
                     Another possibility... - (Steven A S) - (4) - March 18, 2005, 02:12:35 PM EST
                         OT - your picture - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - March 18, 2005, 02:42:47 PM EST
                             Re: OT - your picture - (Steven A S) - (1) - March 18, 2005, 04:18:17 PM EST
                                 OT - twiddle the gamma. - (static) - March 21, 2005, 09:42:07 PM EST
                         This is how memory always works - (ben_tilly) - March 18, 2005, 04:01:46 PM EST
         I guess I'm a believer - (Nightowl) - March 17, 2005, 11:09:12 PM EST