IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Religion, Philosophy, Metaphysics Forum / I knew someone would bring that up
Post #199,227
by bionerd
3/17/05 1:26:39 PM
3/17/05 1:27:12 PM
Reply
New I knew someone would bring that up
I am being a scientist. We have yet to tap into all the powers of the brain. What kind of scientist would I be if I ruled something out just because there is no scientific explanation for it yet? Science would never advance if we all thought like that. There are lots folks out there studying the paranormal- I'm not one of them but it's always been an interest of mine.
It's like, "How much more black could this be?", and the answer is none. None more black.
Expand Edited by bionerd March 17, 2005, 01:27:12 PM EST
Expand All History
Post #199,279
by drewk
Picture of drewk
3/17/05 5:16:51 PM
Reply
New ** applause **
FWIW I think the idea that dreams can be predictive is bunk. But ... you've experienced something I haven't. And you don't discount it just because it's not rational. Works for me.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
     Anyone interested in the predictive power of dreams? - (SignorMonsanto) - (31) - March 16, 2005, 10:01:33 PM EST
         dreams can be predictive retrospectally - (boxley) - March 16, 2005, 10:52:30 PM EST
         Count me in as a believer - (bionerd) - (28) - March 17, 2005, 10:49:48 AM EST
             Think critically about it. - (pwhysall) - (18) - March 17, 2005, 11:58:04 AM EST
                 I knew someone would bring that up - (bionerd) - (1) - March 17, 2005, 01:27:12 PM EST
                     ** applause ** - (drewk) - March 17, 2005, 05:16:51 PM EST
                 Scientists go bump in the night . . - (Andrew Grygus) - March 17, 2005, 02:05:19 PM EST
                 You seem to be reality challenged - (ben_tilly) - (9) - March 17, 2005, 05:45:11 PM EST
                     Eh? - (pwhysall) - March 18, 2005, 01:33:10 AM EST
                     Ah.. a fav Windmill - (Ashton) - March 18, 2005, 05:11:10 AM EST
                     Bio*GEEK*? - (bionerd) - (6) - March 18, 2005, 10:25:58 AM EST
                         Re: Bio*GEEK*? - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Aug. 21, 2007, 12:44:19 PM EDT
                             ICLRPD^3 (new thread) - (Steve Lowe) - March 18, 2005, 11:45:30 AM EST
                         Gah, sorry. I use nerd/geek interchangeably - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 18, 2005, 03:52:44 PM EST
                             Not to worry - (bionerd) - March 18, 2005, 04:53:53 PM EST
                             Couldn't speak for the east... - (inthane-chan) - (1) - March 21, 2005, 05:00:10 PM EST
                                 And in the UK, neither have particularly +ve connotations. -NT - (pwhysall) - March 21, 2005, 05:02:08 PM EST
                 Look at Scott's post in the science forum - (bionerd) - (4) - March 18, 2005, 10:49:47 AM EST
                     The paranormal suffers from lack of explanation - (warmachine) - (1) - March 18, 2005, 11:39:36 AM EST
                         Lack of explanation is a non-issue - (ben_tilly) - March 18, 2005, 03:57:44 PM EST
                     OT: To do a Linky - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 19, 2005, 11:46:39 AM EST
                         Don't forget option 3 - (ben_tilly) - March 19, 2005, 11:47:02 AM EST
             You may be ignoring negatives - (warmachine) - (8) - March 17, 2005, 06:45:06 PM EST
                 Sure, any of those could be true - (bionerd) - (7) - March 18, 2005, 10:31:59 AM EST
                     I prefer 'what is likely and possible?' - (warmachine) - (1) - March 18, 2005, 11:07:37 AM EST
                         'how cause generates effect' - (Ashton) - March 19, 2005, 06:13:28 AM EST
                     Another possibility... - (Steven A S) - (4) - March 18, 2005, 02:12:35 PM EST
                         OT - your picture - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - March 18, 2005, 02:42:47 PM EST
                             Re: OT - your picture - (Steven A S) - (1) - March 18, 2005, 04:18:17 PM EST
                                 OT - twiddle the gamma. - (static) - March 21, 2005, 09:42:07 PM EST
                         This is how memory always works - (ben_tilly) - March 18, 2005, 04:01:46 PM EST
         I guess I'm a believer - (Nightowl) - March 17, 2005, 11:09:12 PM EST

None of us is as dumb as all of us.
117 ms