IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I'm referring to the recent TMI violation... :D
New what? A perfect line about cuddling
with a safe for sunday school description of the act? TMI no, TMI is...... well I wouldnt want to publish that without a bag over my head and the one in my hand filled with cash.
regards,
daemon
I love her dearly, far beyond any creature I've ever known, and I can prove it, for never once in almost seventy years of married life have I taken her by the throat. Mind you, it's been a near thing once or twice.
George Macdonald Frasier
Clearwater highschool marching band [link|http://www.chstornadoband.org/|http://www.chstornadoband.org/]
     Spot the flaw in the research - (ben_tilly) - (27)
         Not what I was thinking - (drewk) - (1)
             That flaw is secondary - (ben_tilly)
         Ummm , why . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (14)
             "good astrologer" - (pwhysall) - (10)
                 Don't laugh. They exist. I've met some. - (ben_tilly) - (9)
                     I'll reserve judgement, then... - (pwhysall) - (1)
                         Interesting "reserve" - (ben_tilly)
                     A fun one with a card reader. - (Andrew Grygus)
                     Seconded. Again. - (Ashton)
                     So, a good astrologer == a psychologist, with props. -NT - (Meerkat) - (4)
                         Not so much props . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                             Sounds like the I Ching, too. -NT - (admin) - (1)
                                 No doubt. -NT - (Andrew Grygus)
                         so rosarche tests are "props?" - (daemon)
             Because it was on /.? - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                 I once had a professor - (bionerd) - (1)
                     Indeed - (Ashton)
         first off they didnt describe how they came to - (daemon) - (9)
             I'd consider that fairly obvious - (ben_tilly) - (8)
                 thanks, it is obvious and I missed it :-) -NT - (daemon) - (7)
                     Items daemon can hold in memory < 1 -NT - (drewk) - (6)
                         Not true - (ben_tilly) - (5)
                             Apparently not enough, though. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (4)
                                 never enough, however I have met Reuben Pecarve - (daemon) - (3)
                                     That isn't short-term memory - (ben_tilly)
                                     I'm referring to the recent TMI violation... :D -NT - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                                         what? A perfect line about cuddling - (daemon)

I knew it as soon as you told me.
198 ms