Now you can PROVE your nerdliness - (FuManChu) - (61) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:56:20 AM EST
         KNEEL, MORTAL! - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:06:43 AM EST
         That's unpossible! 98 Nerd King God - (Silverlock) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:42:40 PM EST
         Awww. Only an 87. -NT - (imric) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:14:56 AM EST
             82 -NT - (bepatient) - (2) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:33:35 PM EST
                 I fault WVU. - (imric) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:43:48 PM EST
                 Me also -NT - (bluke) - Jan. 20, 2005, 06:45:25 AM EST
             Me too -NT - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:45:46 PM EST
             Same -NT - (broomberg) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:07:55 PM EST
         Got 75%. - (jake123) - (7) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:41:52 AM EST
             That depends on your definition of "badly"... -NT - (inthane-chan) - (6) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:43:15 AM EST
                 Pretty much - (jake123) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:44:33 AM EST
                     I had the opposite problem. - (inthane-chan) - (4) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:47:12 AM EST
                         The first time I took a purity test .... - (Silverlock) - (3) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:56:11 AM EST
                             My result was so high... - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:09:12 PM EST
                                 Somehow, I'm not surprised at this, Barry. ;-) -NT - (n3jja) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 08:21:55 PM EST
                                     The thing about purity tests - (drewk) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:45:30 PM EST
         I didn't know I was this big a loser. 87 - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:02:43 PM EST
             *shakes hand* - (imric) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:04:39 PM EST
         53 -NT - (drewk) - (2) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:07:37 PM EST
             Take it again and cheat this time! ;-) -NT - (lincoln) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 03:30:58 PM EST
                 Re: Take it again and cheat this time! ;-) - (Steven A S) - Jan. 19, 2005, 03:40:24 PM EST
         I don't know - (tjsinclair) - (4) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:11:00 PM EST
             Ooh, irony -NT - (drewk) - (3) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:19:42 PM EST
                 On the other hand - (tjsinclair) - (2) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:59:03 PM EST
                     Did you break the link there, too? -NT - (drewk) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 06:47:41 PM EST
                         Nope - (tjsinclair) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:30:44 PM EST
         Sheesh. 93 - Nerd King. -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:40:48 PM EST
         This test would be easy to cheat . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:44:52 PM EST
             I'm a Total loser - 91! -NT - (broomberg) - (4) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:15:40 PM EST
                 Funny, I got a 22 -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:19:19 PM EST
                 I'm a Loser. 81. :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:27:48 PM EST
                 69! My favorite number! ;-) -NT - (n3jja) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 08:27:23 PM EST
                     Yup: nerd -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:49:12 PM EST
         63 - Low Rank Nerd -NT - (Steven A S) - Jan. 19, 2005, 03:06:04 PM EST
         56. Phew, I must have a *bit* of a life :) -NT - (Meerkat) - Jan. 19, 2005, 03:32:40 PM EST
         What? Only a 74%? Something's gotta be wrong. - (Yendor) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 04:07:38 PM EST
             No, by using that link . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Jan. 19, 2005, 08:06:23 PM EST
         Nerdier than I thought! - 90% -NT - (jbrabeck) - Jan. 19, 2005, 04:55:42 PM EST
         Same here - (Nightowl) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 05:22:51 PM EST
             And John is.... - (Nightowl) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:53:43 PM EST
         Re: Now you can PROVE your nerdliness - (Steve Lowe) - Jan. 19, 2005, 05:33:38 PM EST
         61 -NT - (daemon) - Jan. 19, 2005, 06:03:39 PM EST
         Re: Now you can PROVE your nerdliness - (SpiceWare) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:08:09 PM EST
             You should have gotten more points with your ani-gif. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:10:26 PM EST
         64, but I knew that already. -NT - (n3jja) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:28:07 PM EST
         70. - (static) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:59:43 PM EST
         Bow down, foolish mortals. - (admin) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 09:22:17 PM EST
             You should ask your wife what she thinks. :-) -NT - (static) - Jan. 19, 2005, 09:33:01 PM EST
             Was there any doubt? You are **admin** after all. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 19, 2005, 09:44:03 PM EST
             Bow to your new overlord... - (folkert) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2005, 01:46:20 AM EST
                 :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 20, 2005, 09:27:36 AM EST
                 Do you want the IQ test now? -NT - (gdaustin) - Jan. 20, 2005, 09:34:44 PM EST
         84 for me. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:53:32 PM EST
         Supreme Nerd God - (gdaustin) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2005, 12:09:37 AM EST
             That's one of the things that lowered my actual score - (Steven A S) - Jan. 20, 2005, 09:34:33 AM EST
         Oh dearie dearie me. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2005, 10:42:09 AM EST
             HP 41C - (gdaustin) - Jan. 20, 2005, 09:33:44 PM EST
         WTF... 92 ?!? - (CRConrad) - Jan. 21, 2005, 02:19:46 AM EST
         97%.... - (slugbug) - (1) - Jan. 22, 2005, 07:21:30 PM EST
             I.C.L.R.P.D. (new thread) - (folkert) - Jan. 23, 2005, 10:49:30 AM EST
         Not fair - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 8, 2005, 02:33:37 PM EST