Got 75%.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #190,775 by jake123 1/19/05 11:40:54 AM 1/19/05 11:41:52 AM Reply	Got 75%. Not bad. Edit: I see they have a purity quiz coming up. I tend to do very very badly on those. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] \n------------------------------------------------------------------- Edited by jake123 Jan. 19, 2005, 11:41:52 AM EST Got 75%. Not bad. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca * * [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] * * Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] * ------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapse All History
Post #190,776 by inthane-chan 1/19/05 11:43:15 AM Reply	That depends on your definition of "badly"...
Post #190,777 by jake123 1/19/05 11:44:33 AM Reply	Pretty much OTOH, when I've done them in the past in groups of people, I've had people step away from me afterwards... Comes from having passed almost a decade in touring rock bands, I think; I REALLY REALLY excel on the sex and drugs and rock and roll thing. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #190,778 by inthane-chan 1/19/05 11:47:12 AM Reply	I had the opposite problem. The first time I took a purity test, I was more pure than Jesus. "Here at Ortillery Command we have at our disposal hundred megawatt laser beams, mach 20 titanium rods and guided thermonuclear bombs. Some people say we think that we're God. We're not God. We just borrowed his 'SMITE' button for our fire control system."
Post #190,781 by Silverlock 1/19/05 11:56:11 AM Reply	The first time I took a purity test .... the form I was filling out spontaneously combusted. :) ----------------------------------------- "In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for. As for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican." -- H. L. Mencken
Post #190,866 by broomberg 1/19/05 7:09:12 PM Reply	My result was so high... How high was it? It told me I should be a dog so I could stay home and lick my balls all day.
Post #190,884 by n3jja 1/19/05 8:21:55 PM Reply	Somehow, I'm not surprised at this, Barry. ;-)
Post #190,908 by drewk 1/19/05 11:45:30 PM Reply	The thing about purity tests They always asked the wrong questoin. Not, "Have you ever ... ?" But, "Would you ever, if you could get someone to say yes?" That's the number I'm interested in. Oh, ummm ... if you're a hot chick and all. I mean, who cares what another guy gets on one of those. Fag.</flashback> === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]

Now you can PROVE your nerdliness - (FuManChu) - (61) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:56:20 AM EST

KNEEL, MORTAL! - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:06:43 AM EST

That's unpossible! 98 Nerd King God - (Silverlock) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:42:40 PM EST

Awww. Only an 87. -NT - (imric) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:14:56 AM EST

82 -NT - (bepatient) - (2) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:33:35 PM EST

I fault WVU. - (imric) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:43:48 PM EST

Me also -NT - (bluke) - Jan. 20, 2005, 06:45:25 AM EST

Me too -NT - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:45:46 PM EST

Same -NT - (broomberg) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:07:55 PM EST

Got 75%. - (jake123) - (7) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:41:52 AM EST

That depends on your definition of "badly"... -NT - (inthane-chan) - (6) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:43:15 AM EST

Pretty much - (jake123) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:44:33 AM EST

I had the opposite problem. - (inthane-chan) - (4) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:47:12 AM EST

The first time I took a purity test .... - (Silverlock) - (3) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:56:11 AM EST

My result was so high... - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:09:12 PM EST

Somehow, I'm not surprised at this, Barry. ;-) -NT - (n3jja) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 08:21:55 PM EST

The thing about purity tests - (drewk) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:45:30 PM EST

I didn't know I was this big a loser. 87 - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:02:43 PM EST

*shakes hand* - (imric) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:04:39 PM EST

53 -NT - (drewk) - (2) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:07:37 PM EST

Take it again and cheat this time! ;-) -NT - (lincoln) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 03:30:58 PM EST

Re: Take it again and cheat this time! ;-) - (Steven A S) - Jan. 19, 2005, 03:40:24 PM EST

I don't know - (tjsinclair) - (4) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:11:00 PM EST

Ooh, irony -NT - (drewk) - (3) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:19:42 PM EST

On the other hand - (tjsinclair) - (2) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:59:03 PM EST

Did you break the link there, too? -NT - (drewk) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 06:47:41 PM EST

Nope - (tjsinclair) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:30:44 PM EST

Sheesh. 93 - Nerd King. -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:40:48 PM EST

This test would be easy to cheat . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:44:52 PM EST

I'm a Total loser - 91! -NT - (broomberg) - (4) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:15:40 PM EST

Funny, I got a 22 -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:19:19 PM EST

I'm a Loser. 81. :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:27:48 PM EST

69! My favorite number! ;-) -NT - (n3jja) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 08:27:23 PM EST

Yup: nerd -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:49:12 PM EST

63 - Low Rank Nerd -NT - (Steven A S) - Jan. 19, 2005, 03:06:04 PM EST

56. Phew, I must have a *bit* of a life :) -NT - (Meerkat) - Jan. 19, 2005, 03:32:40 PM EST

What? Only a 74%? Something's gotta be wrong. - (Yendor) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 04:07:38 PM EST

No, by using that link . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Jan. 19, 2005, 08:06:23 PM EST

Nerdier than I thought! - 90% -NT - (jbrabeck) - Jan. 19, 2005, 04:55:42 PM EST

Same here - (Nightowl) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 05:22:51 PM EST

And John is.... - (Nightowl) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:53:43 PM EST

Re: Now you can PROVE your nerdliness - (Steve Lowe) - Jan. 19, 2005, 05:33:38 PM EST

61 -NT - (daemon) - Jan. 19, 2005, 06:03:39 PM EST

Re: Now you can PROVE your nerdliness - (SpiceWare) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:08:09 PM EST

You should have gotten more points with your ani-gif. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:10:26 PM EST

64, but I knew that already. -NT - (n3jja) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:28:07 PM EST

70. - (static) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:59:43 PM EST

Bow down, foolish mortals. - (admin) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 09:22:17 PM EST

You should ask your wife what she thinks. :-) -NT - (static) - Jan. 19, 2005, 09:33:01 PM EST

Was there any doubt? You are **admin** after all. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 19, 2005, 09:44:03 PM EST

Bow to your new overlord... - (folkert) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2005, 01:46:20 AM EST

:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 20, 2005, 09:27:36 AM EST

Do you want the IQ test now? -NT - (gdaustin) - Jan. 20, 2005, 09:34:44 PM EST

84 for me. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:53:32 PM EST

Supreme Nerd God - (gdaustin) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2005, 12:09:37 AM EST

That's one of the things that lowered my actual score - (Steven A S) - Jan. 20, 2005, 09:34:33 AM EST

Oh dearie dearie me. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2005, 10:42:09 AM EST

HP 41C - (gdaustin) - Jan. 20, 2005, 09:33:44 PM EST

WTF... 92 ?!? - (CRConrad) - Jan. 21, 2005, 02:19:46 AM EST

97%.... - (slugbug) - (1) - Jan. 22, 2005, 07:21:30 PM EST

I.C.L.R.P.D. (new thread) - (folkert) - Jan. 23, 2005, 10:49:30 AM EST

Not fair - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 8, 2005, 02:33:37 PM EST

iwethey.org

Firecracker!
82 ms