ROFL

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #190,392

by imric

1/16/05 3:05:42 PM

ROFL

My argument stands. It doesn't matter if you are an atheist or not; you are still advocating that classes be legislated into society, based on 'correct' thoughts.

And if you can't see what's wrong with that logically, morally, and historically, there is no use continuing this discussion - you are squeezing your eyes shut as tightly as any neocon.

[link|http://forfree.sytes.net|

]

Imric's Tips for Living

Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.

Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.

ps. Should you feel the need to respond to this - (imric) - (60) - Jan. 14, 2005, 12:55:13 PM EST

The differences between us are not that great. - (mmoffitt) - (59) - Jan. 14, 2005, 09:37:20 PM EST

I think it's a chasm. Almost insuperable. - (imric) - (58) - Jan. 14, 2005, 10:11:56 PM EST

Okay, let's simplify. - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Jan. 14, 2005, 10:28:05 PM EST

Because your 'obvious answer' is wrong. - (imric) - (2) - Jan. 14, 2005, 10:52:24 PM EST

FWIW, I am not an aetheist. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 16, 2005, 02:26:14 PM EST

ROFL - (imric) - Jan. 16, 2005, 03:05:42 PM EST

Sounds to me like you've got 2 groups. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 14, 2005, 10:56:39 PM EST

I don't need to flesh it out further. - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 16, 2005, 02:28:07 PM EST

"The tyranny of the majority" must be fought at all costs. - (a6l6e6x) - (51) - Jan. 14, 2005, 10:28:45 PM EST

And it is SO much worse than the ordinary kind, right? - (imric) - (50) - Jan. 14, 2005, 10:49:42 PM EST

Well, we could start with having a similar # voting machines - (Ashton) - (49) - Jan. 16, 2005, 06:37:05 AM EST

Not fine; in danger. - (imric) - (48) - Jan. 16, 2005, 08:44:15 AM EST

Too late? We'll see. - (mmoffitt) - (47) - Jan. 16, 2005, 02:33:38 PM EST

And you are arguing - (imric) - (46) - Jan. 16, 2005, 03:03:01 PM EST

Mebbe you should answer his question - (jb4) - (45) - Jan. 17, 2005, 09:32:20 AM EST

<sigh> - (imric) - (44) - Jan. 17, 2005, 09:48:11 AM EST

Or even... - (Another Scott) - (13) - Jan. 17, 2005, 10:04:08 AM EST

Err, look at your stuff from a different angle. - (mmoffitt) - (12) - Jan. 17, 2005, 04:43:20 PM EST

A majority isn't all. - (Another Scott) - (11) - Jan. 17, 2005, 04:58:30 PM EST

Not a bad idea... - (jb4) - Jan. 17, 2005, 06:11:48 PM EST

How about a civics test? - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Jan. 18, 2005, 08:15:48 AM EST

Who writes the test? Who judges it? -NT - (Another Scott) - (6) - Jan. 18, 2005, 09:21:47 AM EST

moi? -NT - (Ashton) - (5) - Jan. 18, 2005, 05:15:57 PM EST

^^^^ I'd be comfortable with that. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Jan. 18, 2005, 06:40:24 PM EST

And when he passes on... - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Jan. 18, 2005, 06:41:16 PM EST

Me. Then, my kids. Then, ... - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 18, 2005, 06:45:15 PM EST

Of course you would - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:26:13 AM EST

It should ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:42:41 AM EST

Civics test would be counterproductive! - (GBert) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:36:08 AM EST

read the voting rights act of 1964 - (daemon) - Jan. 19, 2005, 08:17:44 PM EST

Consider yourself forgiven - (jb4) - (29) - Jan. 17, 2005, 01:24:56 PM EST

For the individual, or the whole? - (Simon_Jester) - (26) - Jan. 17, 2005, 01:51:42 PM EST

Nazi's best result at the polls were 38% - (Arkadiy) - (25) - Jan. 17, 2005, 02:45:16 PM EST

Cogent link. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 17, 2005, 02:58:47 PM EST

Hmmm -- Sound familiar? - (jb4) - (22) - Jan. 17, 2005, 06:06:09 PM EST

You're right, of course. - (mmoffitt) - (21) - Jan. 18, 2005, 08:19:12 AM EST

A much more civilized way of saying - (imric) - (20) - Jan. 18, 2005, 08:53:43 AM EST

Oh.. we *haven't* a 'hierarchy of privilege', then? -NT - (Ashton) - (19) - Jan. 18, 2005, 06:29:40 PM EST

Succinct. Love it. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 18, 2005, 06:43:52 PM EST

It's the "Dogma of Otherness" all over again... -NT - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 18, 2005, 06:45:34 PM EST

Not legislated. - (imric) - (16) - Jan. 18, 2005, 08:02:06 PM EST

Sure it is - (jake123) - (15) - Jan. 19, 2005, 09:45:55 AM EST

Care to elaborate? -NT - (Arkadiy) - (14) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:27:07 AM EST

Yep - (jake123) - (13) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:49:45 AM EST

How is that legislated? - (imric) - (11) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:56:45 AM EST

You're kidding, right? - (mmoffitt) - (10) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:05:33 PM EST

Don't bother... - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:06:48 PM EST

Sure they are. - (imric) - (8) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:11:44 PM EST

No, not easy - (jake123) - (6) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:22:27 PM EST

Bah. - (imric) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:33:39 PM EST

{sheesh} Take 2 aspirin and read Animal Farm again.. -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 21, 2005, 06:03:21 PM EST

How can you say that... - (jb4) - (3) - Jan. 24, 2005, 01:39:16 PM EST

And these things infringe on rights exactly how? - (imric) - (2) - Jan. 24, 2005, 02:09:11 PM EST

Clue 1: According to the US Supreme Court, Money == Speech. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 24, 2005, 03:24:40 PM EST

Izzatso? - (imric) - Jan. 24, 2005, 04:14:44 PM EST

Rich and poor alike have the same prohibition. - (Silverlock) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:39:44 PM EST

Well, that's not legislated - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:26:02 PM EST

The acronym TPOTPS doesn't have quite the ring of, - (Ashton) - Jan. 18, 2005, 01:32:13 AM EST

Now THAT'S a question - (imric) - (1) - Jan. 17, 2005, 02:06:07 PM EST

Like Picard said to the Borg... - (jb4) - Jan. 17, 2005, 06:08:07 PM EST

iwethey.org

Severity set to `grave'.
193 ms