Because Kerry hopes to get mileage out of it.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #181,436 by marlowe 10/28/04 12:21:19 PM Reply	Because Kerry hopes to get mileage out of it. He's screaming about it for all its worth. Got a campaign ad devoted exclusively to it. Slandering our troops again, just to get at Bush. ---------------------------------------------------------------- I will not rate. Lucy Ramirez please pick up the white courtesy phone. Kerry is a liar and he doesn't tolerate fights from others. "All the news you wish would go away" [link\|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html\|http://www.angelfire...arlowe/index.html]
Post #181,437 by admin 10/28/04 12:24:11 PM Reply	No doubt he hopes to. No worse than Bush's stupid attack ads. Both of them need to get on to real issues. The problem is that crap issues and wedge issues are what sell. Is he slandering our troops? No. He's berating the leaders. Don't confuse the two. Supporting the troops isn't the same as supporting Bush. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #181,444 by deSitter 10/28/04 12:39:16 PM Reply	Well the beloved troops are pretty damned incompetent Surprise! A lot of worthless Pentagoners backed up by punk rockers with tanks. They'd get their asses handed to them in a real fight. -drl
Post #181,445 by admin 10/28/04 12:43:22 PM Reply	Some of them are. Like in any enterprise. There are a lot of very good people over there (my brother-in-law was one of them). You rarely hear about people doing their jobs well. But put good people in a bad situation and you still have a bad situation. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #181,455 by deSitter 10/28/04 1:06:34 PM Reply	Citizen soldiers Large standing professional armies FAIL. You win by having something real to win, and citizens with a personal stake. -drl
Post #181,472 by ChrisR 10/28/04 1:51:56 PM Reply	Vietnam was not a military failure And neither is Iraq. The problem lies within political domain.
Post #181,478 by deSitter 10/28/04 1:58:13 PM Reply	I vehemently disagree Great officers are boiled out of the morass of pukes by actual war. Neither Iraq nor Vietnam can be called actual war, so the pukes are in charge. The grunt has his limited view in all cases. His morale depends on having a definite goal and good leadership. That will never happen in Iraq, just as it never happened in Vietnam. (Isolated cases like Col. Moore at Dien Bien Phu do not count.) -drl
Post #181,447 by jb4 10/28/04 12:52:59 PM Reply	Interesting...bot is full of Write-Only Memory (WOM) Slandering our troops again, just to get at Bush. Wonder if the bot can stop spewing long enough to accept any input? Any fool who can associate a subject and predicate would learn that the troops aren't being slandered, but rather the ass-clowns (to borrow an appropriate phrase) who allegedly prepared this ~~fiasco~~...er, ~~quagmire~~...uh, "adventure" are the ones being slandered; you know the PNACers in the "administration", including your fucknuts heroes, Philbert. But then when your program is set to `stdin > /dev/null`, it's hard to correctly assimilate input, ain't it? jb4 shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub* + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf.* BULLSHIT
Post #181,464 by pwhysall 10/28/04 1:36:51 PM Reply	Syntax Error. You mean `stdin < /dev/null`. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home]
Post #181,485 by jb4 10/28/04 2:09:20 PM Reply	Thanx- Nix is rusty. Design isn't jb4 shrub\ufffdbish* (Am., from shrub* + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf.* BULLSHIT

Incompetent Coalitioners lose 400 tons of go-boom - (deSitter) - (33) - Oct. 25, 2004, 09:22:46 AM EDT

So nice that we're safer. -NT - (imric) - Oct. 25, 2004, 09:27:03 AM EDT

More on CNN - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Oct. 25, 2004, 12:39:15 PM EDT

Bat? He'd use a BB gun -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 25, 2004, 12:42:25 PM EDT

Chainsaw. - (inthane-chan) - Oct. 25, 2004, 12:43:05 PM EDT

About those missing explosives at al Qaqqaa - (marlowe) - (4) - Oct. 25, 2004, 03:47:18 PM EDT

Agreement...but as Scott McClellan has pointed out... - (Simon_Jester) - Oct. 25, 2004, 05:19:08 PM EDT

Read above - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Oct. 25, 2004, 05:30:35 PM EDT

There was... but wrong hands. -NT - (xtensive) - Oct. 25, 2004, 06:27:25 PM EDT

Little time to debunk - (ChrisR) - Oct. 28, 2004, 04:27:04 PM EDT

The incredible shrinking explosives looting scandal - (marlowe) - (23) - Oct. 28, 2004, 12:10:03 PM EDT

It's a stupid point to make a fuss over. - (admin) - (10) - Oct. 28, 2004, 12:13:45 PM EDT

Because Kerry hopes to get mileage out of it. - (marlowe) - (9) - Oct. 28, 2004, 12:21:19 PM EDT

No doubt he hopes to. - (admin) - (5) - Oct. 28, 2004, 12:24:11 PM EDT

Well the beloved troops are pretty damned incompetent - (deSitter) - (4) - Oct. 28, 2004, 12:39:16 PM EDT

Some of them are. - (admin) - (3) - Oct. 28, 2004, 12:43:22 PM EDT

Citizen soldiers - (deSitter) - (2) - Oct. 28, 2004, 01:06:34 PM EDT

Vietnam was not a military failure - (ChrisR) - (1) - Oct. 28, 2004, 01:51:56 PM EDT

I vehemently disagree - (deSitter) - Oct. 28, 2004, 01:58:13 PM EDT

Interesting...bot is full of Write-Only Memory (WOM) - (jb4) - (2) - Oct. 28, 2004, 12:52:59 PM EDT

Syntax Error. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Oct. 28, 2004, 01:36:51 PM EDT

Thanx- - (jb4) - Oct. 28, 2004, 02:09:20 PM EDT

Curiouser and Curiouser - ABC News you say? - (Simon_Jester) - (11) - Oct. 28, 2004, 06:15:56 PM EDT

little phil needs better proof than ABC -NT - (daemon) - (10) - Oct. 28, 2004, 06:49:51 PM EDT

How about Fox news? - (Silverlock) - (9) - Oct. 28, 2004, 09:31:41 PM EDT

No, it hasnt been approved by either Karl, Rove or Marx -NT - (daemon) - (8) - Oct. 28, 2004, 10:06:32 PM EDT

Will you please quit putting Marx in with those guys? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Oct. 29, 2004, 11:49:15 AM EDT

Yeah, keep Zeppo out of it! -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 29, 2004, 12:38:40 PM EDT

moffo is a Groucho Marxist -NT - (deSitter) - Oct. 29, 2004, 12:40:11 PM EDT

Re: Will you please quit putting Marx in with those guys? - (daemon) - (4) - Oct. 29, 2004, 06:02:57 PM EDT

Not even close. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Oct. 31, 2004, 10:55:11 AM EST

Saw all the movies though. My ilk did too... -NT - (hnick) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2004, 10:57:42 AM EST

Well, at least you concede being ill-informed ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Oct. 31, 2004, 11:02:17 AM EST

read all of it - (daemon) - Oct. 31, 2004, 02:16:54 PM EST

iwethey.org

Yow!
148 ms