Re: On bilateral talks

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #177,427 by rcareaga 10/1/04 8:52:48 PM Reply	Re: On bilateral talks Bush also neglected to mention that the other four parties—Japan, China, Russia and South Korea—all want the US to engage in bilateral talks with NK. But I suspect that he was genuinely unaware of this. cordially, Cthulhu for President. Why vote for a lesser evil?
Post #177,431 by bepatient 10/1/04 8:55:55 PM Reply	But...here's the spin... Kerry supports international approval and cooperation and thinks all of our foreign policy depends on it...but he wants us to go at NK by ourselves. Flip flop. Heard that one today. If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #177,446 by Ashton 10/1/04 10:07:50 PM Reply	This must be that exclusive-OR I've heard so much about Mere fact of a US/NK confab -?- implicitly nullifies any other agreements, understandings, sub-rosa attachments etc. ad legislatum.. Flippant flop-flip, that - ya can't spin jello! Gerrymandered in Joisey
Post #177,466 by bepatient 10/2/04 8:43:13 AM Reply	Used the same by Kerry camp as you know that our military could not possibly fight in Iraq and still look for Bin Laden. If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #177,470 by jake123 10/2/04 10:19:27 AM Reply	According to your military not if they want to do the latter job properly. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------

Has tonight's debate already happened? - (Yendor) - (46) - Sept. 30, 2004, 03:46:53 PM EDT

Looks like they are planning ahead - (JayMehaffey) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2004, 04:19:09 PM EDT

--kinda like an obit for a famous deceased [man, country] -NT - (Ashton) - Sept. 30, 2004, 05:47:30 PM EDT

"they decide who won" - (Arkadiy) - Sept. 30, 2004, 05:55:05 PM EDT

It's gone now. Who won? :-\\ -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2004, 06:01:46 PM EDT

Quoted for Great Justice - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2004, 06:35:06 PM EDT

Be interesting to do a difference analysis - (jb4) - Sept. 30, 2004, 06:51:21 PM EDT

Watching it now. - (Silverlock) - (3) - Sept. 30, 2004, 09:34:34 PM EDT

We're also watching it - (Nightowl) - Sept. 30, 2004, 09:37:32 PM EDT

Revenge of the id -NT - (deSitter) - Sept. 30, 2004, 10:10:15 PM EDT

Re: Watching it now. comments from da boss - (daemon) - Sept. 30, 2004, 10:33:29 PM EDT

Happening alright - (deSitter) - (18) - Sept. 30, 2004, 10:09:51 PM EDT

ICLRPD - (rcareaga) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2004, 10:35:42 PM EDT

Re: ICLRPD - (daemon) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2004, 10:39:12 PM EDT

This msg courtesy of the Imus Republican Arty -NT - (deSitter) - Sept. 30, 2004, 10:51:44 PM EDT

Agree. - (bepatient) - (12) - Sept. 30, 2004, 10:55:00 PM EDT

Re: Agree. - (deSitter) - (11) - Sept. 30, 2004, 10:57:45 PM EDT

No, it's painful. - (admin) - (10) - Sept. 30, 2004, 11:51:34 PM EDT

He is? - (deSitter) - (9) - Oct. 1, 2004, 12:46:21 AM EDT

He is what? - (admin) - (8) - Oct. 1, 2004, 08:02:01 AM EDT

No he doesn't - (deSitter) - (7) - Oct. 1, 2004, 09:04:47 AM EDT

You're missing my point. - (admin) - (6) - Oct. 1, 2004, 09:25:34 AM EDT

Beg to differ, slightly. - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Oct. 1, 2004, 09:32:29 AM EDT

Er, no, you don't. - (admin) - (4) - Oct. 1, 2004, 09:49:57 AM EDT

Er, okay, but ... - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Oct. 1, 2004, 10:13:47 AM EDT

Re: Er, okay, but ... - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 1, 2004, 03:41:21 PM EDT

Better. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Oct. 1, 2004, 04:40:52 PM EDT

Ar. -NT - (admin) - Oct. 1, 2004, 04:46:50 PM EDT

Looks like a technical to me - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2004, 11:08:40 PM EDT

"Sudden Death"....Apt phrase, indeed! -NT - (jb4) - Oct. 1, 2004, 09:20:28 AM EDT

It is now - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2004, 10:54:32 PM EDT

Utterly disagree - (deSitter) - Sept. 30, 2004, 10:59:44 PM EDT

Agree. - (admin) - Sept. 30, 2004, 11:53:54 PM EDT

It was a tie. - (Another Scott) - (13) - Sept. 30, 2004, 11:17:08 PM EDT

Mostly agree, but would give Kerry slight edge. - (a6l6e6x) - Sept. 30, 2004, 11:37:05 PM EDT

It matters not who won . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - Sept. 30, 2004, 11:44:54 PM EDT

Yup. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2004, 11:48:08 PM EDT

Right, and if the media says . . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Oct. 1, 2004, 12:26:15 AM EDT

No chance of that. - (mmoffitt) - Oct. 1, 2004, 09:18:40 AM EDT

Boundless cynicism -NT - (deSitter) - Oct. 1, 2004, 12:43:09 AM EDT

An unscientific survey says it DID change some votes - (jb4) - Oct. 1, 2004, 09:26:13 AM EDT

On bilateral talks - (drewk) - (5) - Oct. 1, 2004, 09:41:10 AM EDT

Re: On bilateral talks - (rcareaga) - (4) - Oct. 1, 2004, 08:52:48 PM EDT

But...here's the spin... - (bepatient) - (3) - Oct. 1, 2004, 08:55:55 PM EDT

This must be that exclusive-OR I've heard so much about - (Ashton) - (2) - Oct. 1, 2004, 10:07:50 PM EDT

Used the same by Kerry camp - (bepatient) - (1) - Oct. 2, 2004, 08:43:13 AM EDT

According to your military - (jake123) - Oct. 2, 2004, 10:19:27 AM EDT

iwethey.org

You know the French. The problem with them is that they have no word for entrepreneur.
120 ms