IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New On bilateral talks
Bush says it's wrong to hold bilateral talks with Kim Jong Il, because that's exactly what he wants.[1] He said, "When you're talking with a madman, you want to be surrounded by allies." Like China. Allies.

So when talking to a madman, you want to make sure you're surrounded by allies. But when invading a country with the world's fourth largest army to depose a madman ... eh, we'll do that one on our own.



[1] Let's ignore for the moment the possibility that what Kim Jong Il wants just may also be good for us.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Re: On bilateral talks
Bush also neglected to mention that the other four parties—Japan, China, Russia and South Korea—all want the US to engage in bilateral talks with NK.

But I suspect that he was genuinely unaware of this.

cordially,
Cthulhu for President. Why vote for a lesser evil?
New But...here's the spin...
Kerry supports international approval and cooperation and thinks all of our foreign policy depends on it...but he wants us to go at NK by ourselves.

Flip flop.

Heard that one today.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New This must be that exclusive-OR I've heard so much about
Mere fact of a US/NK confab -?- implicitly nullifies any other agreements, understandings, sub-rosa attachments etc. ad legislatum..

Flippant flop-flip, that - ya can't spin jello!


Gerrymandered in Joisey
New Used the same by Kerry camp
as you know that our military could not possibly fight in Iraq and still look for Bin Laden.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New According to your military
not if they want to do the latter job properly.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
     Has tonight's debate already happened? - (Yendor) - (46)
         Looks like they are planning ahead - (JayMehaffey) - (2)
             --kinda like an obit for a famous deceased [man, country] -NT - (Ashton)
             "they decide who won" - (Arkadiy)
         It's gone now. Who won? :-\\ -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2)
             Quoted for Great Justice - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                 Be interesting to do a difference analysis - (jb4)
         Watching it now. - (Silverlock) - (3)
             We're also watching it - (Nightowl)
             Revenge of the id -NT - (deSitter)
             Re: Watching it now. comments from da boss - (daemon)
         Happening alright - (deSitter) - (18)
             ICLRPD - (rcareaga) - (2)
                 Re: ICLRPD - (daemon) - (1)
                     This msg courtesy of the Imus Republican Arty -NT - (deSitter)
             Agree. - (bepatient) - (12)
                 Re: Agree. - (deSitter) - (11)
                     No, it's painful. - (admin) - (10)
                         He is? - (deSitter) - (9)
                             He is what? - (admin) - (8)
                                 No he doesn't - (deSitter) - (7)
                                     You're missing my point. - (admin) - (6)
                                         Beg to differ, slightly. - (mmoffitt) - (5)
                                             Er, no, you don't. - (admin) - (4)
                                                 Er, okay, but ... - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                                                     Re: Er, okay, but ... - (admin) - (2)
                                                         Better. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                                             Ar. -NT - (admin)
             Looks like a technical to me - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
                 "Sudden Death"....Apt phrase, indeed! -NT - (jb4)
         It is now - (ben_tilly) - (2)
             Utterly disagree - (deSitter)
             Agree. - (admin)
         It was a tie. - (Another Scott) - (13)
             Mostly agree, but would give Kerry slight edge. - (a6l6e6x)
             It matters not who won . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4)
                 Yup. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                     Right, and if the media says . . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                         No chance of that. - (mmoffitt)
                 Boundless cynicism -NT - (deSitter)
             An unscientific survey says it DID change some votes - (jb4)
             On bilateral talks - (drewk) - (5)
                 Re: On bilateral talks - (rcareaga) - (4)
                     But...here's the spin... - (bepatient) - (3)
                         This must be that exclusive-OR I've heard so much about - (Ashton) - (2)
                             Used the same by Kerry camp - (bepatient) - (1)
                                 According to your military - (jake123)

Altered daily unreality.
153 ms