Post #152,539
4/25/04 11:21:08 AM
|
Umm. Why not use something that works then?
Like Groupwise or Ximian's Data server.
Neither one requires eDIR anymore.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute.
Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
|
Post #152,544
4/25/04 11:40:31 AM
|
The problem with Exchange...
...is that the users love it. Outlook sucks for email but it's not bad at managing contacts and diaries.
Public folders, shared calendaring, shared contact lists - it's all fab at the client end.
As I know and you know and Andrew is discovering, at the other end it's a complete bear. Has to run on Windows, 200x versions require AD, yadda yadda.
But there's nothing to touch it for a groupware solution. Not Groupwise, not Notes, not OGO. And that's A Problem.
Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #152,551
4/25/04 2:17:55 PM
|
You ever use Groupwise with the...
Document library options, with web-publishing and so on...
Exchange doesn't even compare. If you had ever used GroupWise fully at versions later than 5.2 you would know this.
Groupwise is by far a better integrated system and far more expandable and scalable that cannot be compared to by Exchange.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute.
Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
|
Post #152,554
4/25/04 2:40:58 PM
|
agreed
attempting to explain profiling doesn't require one to take a position for or against it any more than attempting to explain gravity requires one to be for or against gravity. Walter Williams
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
|
Post #152,555
4/25/04 2:58:12 PM
|
OK.
Not having used GroupWise serverside since 5.0, I can't speak to the current functionality.
I do know that the client STILL sucks all holy arse, though. Had to use it for a week (one of our offices is a NetWare/GroupWise shop) and it was painful. I've never been glad to go back to Outlook before or since. The only thing I've ever met that sucks more is the Notes client.
GroupWise always was nicer at the server end. But with a client like that...
Anyway, none of this helps Andrew. His client has Exchange 2003, and is almost certainly unwilling to junk that investment (it ain't cheap).
Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #152,559
4/25/04 4:09:06 PM
|
You can use Lookout as a Groupwise client now.
So you can get the best of both worlds that way.
Nearly all functionality too. Indexed Text searching in the Doc-Lib doesn;t work right now and a few other nits like that.
Diary and Calendaring, resource scheduling etc... all works.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute.
Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
|
Post #152,571
4/25/04 7:49:57 PM
|
Isn't there a server-side 'connector'
That allows Exchange to use a standard imap server for Outlook clients? IIRC (and I might be wrong) I stumbled over a project that does this when I was looking at the Ximian connector for evolution...
Imric's Tips for Living
- Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
- Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
- Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.
|
Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
|
|
Post #152,573
4/25/04 8:29:09 PM
|
OT: Peter, you need to post more. I don't like being #15.
|
Post #152,585
4/25/04 9:30:24 PM
|
Re: Umm. Why not use something that works then?
Some years ago a purchasing agent (who later disappeared without notice) decided the company should be "all Microsoft" and got a buy-in from the president.
Today, they are not so sold on Microsoft, but they just paid a whole lot of money for Exchange 2003 and Windows 2003 server and the AD conversion (no, they didn't pay it to me - they were trying out a new consultant), so they are psychologically committed to using it.
Given the circumstances, my best course is to keep my mouth shut and take their money. There won't be a real opportunity for change here for a few years now.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
|
Post #152,588
4/25/04 11:23:50 PM
|
'Tis very understandable.
I see many companies going this route and be very dis-[ satisfied | gruntled | illusioned | gusted | enchanted ] and are really not looking to pursue further spending on M$ Products.
I am working on converting the Place I work to Linux only. And of course Open Source (some do cost money you know) Programs for all things needed.
Granted there are some places it won't work. But an RDesktop solution might actually work. Therefore minimizng cost of the M$ Tax.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute.
Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
|
Post #152,600
4/26/04 1:04:58 AM
|
ICLRPD (new thread)
Created as new thread #152599 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=152599|ICLRPD]
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
