IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New You ever use Groupwise with the...
Document library options, with web-publishing and so on...

Exchange doesn't even compare. If you had ever used GroupWise fully at versions later than 5.2 you would know this.

Groupwise is by far a better integrated system and far more expandable and scalable that cannot be compared to by Exchange.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey

Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute.
Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
New agreed
attempting to explain profiling doesn't require one to take a position for or against it any more than attempting to explain gravity requires one to be for or against gravity. Walter Williams
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New OK.
Not having used GroupWise serverside since 5.0, I can't speak to the current functionality.

I do know that the client STILL sucks all holy arse, though. Had to use it for a week (one of our offices is a NetWare/GroupWise shop) and it was painful. I've never been glad to go back to Outlook before or since. The only thing I've ever met that sucks more is the Notes client.

GroupWise always was nicer at the server end. But with a client like that...

Anyway, none of this helps Andrew. His client has Exchange 2003, and is almost certainly unwilling to junk that investment (it ain't cheap).


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New You can use Lookout as a Groupwise client now.
So you can get the best of both worlds that way.

Nearly all functionality too. Indexed Text searching in the Doc-Lib doesn;t work right now and a few other nits like that.

Diary and Calendaring, resource scheduling etc... all works.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey

Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute.
Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
New Isn't there a server-side 'connector'
That allows Exchange to use a standard imap server for Outlook clients? IIRC (and I might be wrong) I stumbled over a project that does this when I was looking at the Ximian connector for evolution...

Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 
New OT: Peter, you need to post more. I don't like being #15.
     Oh Jeez, now what? - (Andrew Grygus) - (15)
         Re: Oh Jeez, now what? - (qstephens) - (1)
             Yes, but no mailboxes get made. - (Andrew Grygus)
         Why make new users? Why not just aliases? -NT - (FuManChu) - (12)
             Well, because . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (11)
                 Umm. Why not use something that works then? - (folkert) - (10)
                     The problem with Exchange... - (pwhysall) - (6)
                         You ever use Groupwise with the... - (folkert) - (5)
                             agreed -NT - (boxley)
                             OK. - (pwhysall) - (3)
                                 You can use Lookout as a Groupwise client now. - (folkert)
                                 Isn't there a server-side 'connector' - (imric)
                                 OT: Peter, you need to post more. I don't like being #15. -NT - (Another Scott)
                     Re: Umm. Why not use something that works then? - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                         'Tis very understandable. - (folkert)
                         ICLRPD (new thread) - (drewk)

Plumbing is not coding. There is no concept of rolling back the previously saved version of the house.
72 ms