IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 1 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Regional/World Conflict Forum
/
Necroeqquiphilia; I'll have to remember that one ;-)
Post #151,015
by
bbronson
4/13/04 12:20:46 PM
Reply
Necroeqquiphilia; I'll have to remember that one ;-)
testimony of Dr. Strangerice
- (
rcareaga
)
- (176)
- April 8, 2004, 05:17:47 PM EDT
NPR stream at work.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (31)
- April 8, 2004, 04:11:25 PM EDT
My take since fall 2001
- (
GBert
)
- (30)
- April 9, 2004, 10:02:11 AM EDT
Heh. I'm not that jaded, but interestingly, ...
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (29)
- April 12, 2004, 05:49:25 PM EDT
But you might become that jaded
- (
jb4
)
- (27)
- April 12, 2004, 05:44:29 PM EDT
If that's true.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (26)
- April 12, 2004, 05:53:58 PM EDT
Dude...they weren't ELECTED, remember?
- (
jb4
)
- (25)
- April 12, 2004, 06:07:54 PM EDT
name one scenario that gore wins
- (
boxley
)
- (24)
- April 12, 2004, 06:23:29 PM EDT
'Cept Clinton *WAS* impeached IIRC...
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (1)
- April 12, 2004, 06:40:28 PM EDT
true
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- April 12, 2004, 06:41:35 PM EDT
Right, box. How'd I forget?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- April 13, 2004, 08:24:40 AM EDT
3k, would have pushed gore over,
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- April 13, 2004, 08:40:44 AM EDT
Umm, count the votes?
- (
Silverlock
)
- (13)
- April 13, 2004, 08:32:54 AM EDT
um, they did repeatedly in all counties
- (
boxley
)
- (12)
- April 13, 2004, 08:39:47 AM EDT
You said name one.
- (
Silverlock
)
- (4)
- April 13, 2004, 08:53:55 AM EDT
each method you describe doesnt get gore into the whitehouse
- (
boxley
)
- (3)
- April 13, 2004, 09:42:01 AM EDT
Saying black is white doesn't make it so.
-NT
- (
Silverlock
)
- (2)
- April 13, 2004, 12:35:59 PM EDT
so why do you keep saying it?
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- April 13, 2004, 12:43:06 PM EDT
I know you are but what am I? :)
-NT
- (
Silverlock
)
- April 13, 2004, 01:33:03 PM EDT
Re: um, they did repeatedly in all counties
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (6)
- April 13, 2004, 08:55:15 AM EDT
what roadblocks where in the constitution does it say revote
- (
boxley
)
- (5)
- April 13, 2004, 09:38:20 AM EDT
The Constitution doesn't say ...
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (4)
- April 13, 2004, 09:42:15 AM EDT
the constitution explicitly states how the president is
- (
boxley
)
- (3)
- April 13, 2004, 09:44:40 AM EDT
So your answer is yes. ;-p
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (2)
- April 13, 2004, 09:46:19 AM EDT
you can abandon the constitution, I wont
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- April 13, 2004, 09:50:36 AM EDT
Seems you *have*, already.
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- April 13, 2004, 04:29:04 PM EDT
What if, what if, what if...
- (
jb4
)
- (5)
- April 13, 2004, 01:42:45 PM EDT
nope electoral college voted him in, just like in the manual
- (
boxley
)
- (4)
- April 13, 2004, 02:00:29 PM EDT
constitution sez, election by *properly elected* electoral.
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (3)
- April 13, 2004, 04:30:19 PM EDT
you want to explain?
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- April 13, 2004, 06:29:25 PM EDT
Florida electoral college was -S-elected by US Supreme Court
- (
CRConrad
)
- (1)
- April 14, 2004, 04:37:10 AM EDT
Florida electoral was not selected by the supremes
- (
boxley
)
- April 14, 2004, 08:22:23 AM EDT
ICLRPD (new thread)
- (
drewk
)
- April 12, 2004, 05:46:11 PM EDT
Re: testimony of Dr. Strangerice
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (5)
- April 8, 2004, 04:39:18 PM EDT
Not this crap again.
- (
bepatient
)
- (4)
- April 8, 2004, 05:27:12 PM EDT
Nahnahnah. I ... cant .. hear ... you
- (
altmann
)
- (1)
- April 8, 2004, 07:09:26 PM EDT
Same BS.
- (
bepatient
)
- April 8, 2004, 08:17:03 PM EDT
The point in this case is valid
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (1)
- April 8, 2004, 09:40:13 PM EDT
No they didn't.
- (
bepatient
)
- April 8, 2004, 09:52:33 PM EDT
Rice's testimony: executive summary
- (
rcareaga
)
- (5)
- April 8, 2004, 10:35:59 PM EDT
Tom Shales' take.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (4)
- April 9, 2004, 01:24:10 AM EDT
Interesting tidbit.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (3)
- April 9, 2004, 04:08:31 PM EDT
ADMIN: please fix the above post!
- (
jb4
)
- (2)
- April 9, 2004, 04:06:45 PM EDT
Sorry! Fixed!
-NT
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (1)
- April 9, 2004, 04:08:55 PM EDT
Thanks!
-NT
- (
jb4
)
- April 9, 2004, 04:16:45 PM EDT
I hope this is wrong.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (131)
- April 9, 2004, 09:47:37 AM EDT
Oh dear.
- (
bepatient
)
- (130)
- April 9, 2004, 07:38:31 PM EDT
I hate to say it
- (
jake123
)
- (1)
- April 10, 2004, 01:11:27 AM EDT
Nit: "win again". They have never won. They were appointed.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- April 10, 2004, 01:14:49 PM EDT
I thought most had paid attention.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- April 10, 2004, 01:12:48 PM EDT
Yeah, someone did indeed say something different than her!
- (
jb4
)
- (126)
- April 12, 2004, 01:11:47 PM EDT
I would guess...
- (
bepatient
)
- (41)
- April 12, 2004, 02:03:42 PM EDT
It's not the Commission's Responsibility, it's ours.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- April 12, 2004, 04:52:51 PM EDT
It wasn't historical at the time...
-NT
- (
admin
)
- (3)
- April 12, 2004, 05:10:01 PM EDT
It was over 3 yrs old at the time.
- (
bepatient
)
- (2)
- April 12, 2004, 05:36:30 PM EDT
Re: It was over 3 yrs old at the time.
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- April 12, 2004, 05:47:50 PM EDT
The document itself is in my post. HTH. ;0)
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- April 12, 2004, 05:50:20 PM EDT
None so blind as they that won't see.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (35)
- April 12, 2004, 05:46:53 PM EDT
And so...
- (
bepatient
)
- (34)
- April 12, 2004, 08:48:37 PM EDT
Nice duck.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (33)
- April 13, 2004, 08:20:25 AM EDT
Go ahead.
- (
bepatient
)
- (32)
- April 13, 2004, 10:02:14 AM EDT
Can any of you clowns remember what you're arguing ABOUT?
-NT
- (
pwhysall
)
- (30)
- April 13, 2004, 10:36:20 AM EDT
what does that have to do with anything :-)
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- April 13, 2004, 10:50:07 AM EDT
Oh, oh I am sorry,...
- (
bepatient
)
- April 13, 2004, 10:51:54 AM EDT
Here it is: It was over 3 yrs old at the time.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (27)
- April 13, 2004, 01:51:45 PM EDT
Re: Here it is: It was over 3 yrs old at the time.
- (
bepatient
)
- (26)
- April 13, 2004, 02:15:58 PM EDT
You're just jaggin' me again, aren't you?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (25)
- April 13, 2004, 02:50:14 PM EDT
yeah and the feebs are still looking for hoffa :-)
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- April 13, 2004, 02:56:06 PM EDT
<herring color=bright red>preceding post</herring>
-NT
- (
jb4
)
- (1)
- April 13, 2004, 05:01:36 PM EDT
name one case that wasnt broken by a rat
- (
boxley
)
- April 13, 2004, 10:26:00 PM EDT
You seem to be serious.
- (
bepatient
)
- (21)
- April 13, 2004, 05:39:00 PM EDT
Even if I accept that, you must accept that ...
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (20)
- April 13, 2004, 06:00:19 PM EDT
Certainly.
- (
bepatient
)
- (19)
- April 13, 2004, 09:54:35 PM EDT
What was the title of the briefing?
- (
Silverlock
)
- (1)
- April 13, 2004, 10:33:53 PM EDT
Discourse on whose terms.
- (
bepatient
)
- April 14, 2004, 07:19:15 AM EDT
If all the briefings were release, or even the full text ...
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (16)
- April 14, 2004, 08:22:44 AM EDT
Nope, sorry, try again.
- (
bepatient
)
- (15)
- April 14, 2004, 10:02:58 AM EDT
Just two cents...
- (
GBert
)
- April 14, 2004, 11:41:51 AM EDT
Well, at least you dropped the "3 year old" bit. <sigh>
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (13)
- April 14, 2004, 12:36:57 PM EDT
Point fingers all you like.
- (
bepatient
)
- (12)
- April 14, 2004, 05:02:49 PM EDT
Where'd I say that?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (11)
- April 14, 2004, 05:12:14 PM EDT
No I didn't admit that.
- (
bepatient
)
- (10)
- April 14, 2004, 08:38:22 PM EDT
Can we cut to the chase?
- (
pwhysall
)
- (9)
- April 15, 2004, 01:48:15 AM EDT
Shall I quote more Python?
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- (8)
- April 15, 2004, 02:51:02 AM EDT
Please do
- (
pwhysall
)
- (7)
- April 15, 2004, 07:05:54 AM EDT
Right. What was I thinking?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (6)
- April 15, 2004, 09:55:04 AM EDT
Never mind.
- (
bepatient
)
- (5)
- April 15, 2004, 01:29:05 PM EDT
And 2 == 1, for very large values of 1________:-\ufffd
-NT
- (
jb4
)
- (1)
- April 15, 2004, 02:00:34 PM EDT
:-D
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- April 15, 2004, 02:01:53 PM EDT
It finally makes sense.
- (
Silverlock
)
- (2)
- April 15, 2004, 02:39:19 PM EDT
check out tom tommorow for the definitions
- (
boxley
)
- April 15, 2004, 02:41:47 PM EDT
That's an ancient remark.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- April 15, 2004, 04:48:53 PM EDT
You READ IT.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- April 13, 2004, 01:56:21 PM EDT
Here's a breakdown of her lies
- (
Silverlock
)
- (83)
- April 12, 2004, 04:53:03 PM EDT
I've read through those.
- (
bepatient
)
- (81)
- April 12, 2004, 05:35:34 PM EDT
Seems to me...
- (
admin
)
- April 12, 2004, 05:51:26 PM EDT
You SURE you read this somewhere?
- (
jb4
)
- (79)
- April 12, 2004, 05:57:05 PM EDT
I did not have sex with that woman, miss lewinski
- (
boxley
)
- (78)
- April 12, 2004, 06:07:38 PM EDT
Ermmmm.....Say What?!?
- (
jb4
)
- (77)
- April 12, 2004, 06:13:00 PM EDT
Beeps point was quite clear, and you have watched it swish
- (
boxley
)
- (73)
- April 12, 2004, 06:20:03 PM EDT
whew.
- (
bepatient
)
- (5)
- April 12, 2004, 08:34:29 PM EDT
But your spelling is notoriously faulty
- (
jb4
)
- (4)
- April 13, 2004, 02:03:11 PM EDT
Yup, got that; it's obvious. (WTF YM, "even" I can get it?)
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (3)
- April 16, 2004, 09:35:36 AM EDT
Its a metaphor....or is that a simile...or a euphemism...
- (
jb4
)
- (2)
- April 16, 2004, 09:58:23 AM EDT
I'm the fookin' native speaker.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (1)
- April 16, 2004, 04:59:08 PM EDT
Sorry, mr Inferior Whisky-Like Beverage 4, but Peter's right
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- April 19, 2004, 02:15:28 AM EDT
Nit
- (
Silverlock
)
- (66)
- April 13, 2004, 08:50:08 AM EDT
Yes it is.
- (
bepatient
)
- (65)
- April 13, 2004, 10:04:34 AM EDT
I've held these positions long before this doc came out
- (
Silverlock
)
- (64)
- April 13, 2004, 12:39:27 PM EDT
None so blind as they can't see.
- (
bepatient
)
- (63)
- April 13, 2004, 02:27:58 PM EDT
Guiduin invoked thread closed :-)
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (3)
- April 13, 2004, 02:29:45 PM EDT
Who invoked Guido-an?
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- (2)
- April 13, 2004, 02:31:46 PM EDT
And where's Nunzio?
-NT
- (
inthane-chan
)
- April 13, 2004, 02:40:31 PM EDT
Gallic Godwin :-)
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- April 13, 2004, 02:54:59 PM EDT
Small problem
- (
Silverlock
)
- (56)
- April 13, 2004, 03:18:36 PM EDT
Don't joust with the Master
- (
jb4
)
- (55)
- April 13, 2004, 05:06:08 PM EDT
They are his words.
- (
bepatient
)
- (54)
- April 13, 2004, 05:44:24 PM EDT
The grasshopper objects.
- (
Silverlock
)
- (53)
- April 13, 2004, 10:15:23 PM EDT
I don't believe
- (
bepatient
)
- (52)
- April 13, 2004, 10:32:12 PM EDT
Have you all gone completely INSANE ???
- (
CRConrad
)
- (51)
- April 16, 2004, 09:34:55 AM EDT
Bravo
- (
jbrabeck
)
- April 16, 2004, 09:42:31 AM EDT
Ok. Call it what you want.
- (
bepatient
)
- (7)
- April 16, 2004, 10:14:40 AM EDT
We are (used to be?) a nation of laws, beep.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (4)
- April 16, 2004, 10:36:04 AM EDT
I don't think you get it either.
- (
bepatient
)
- (3)
- April 16, 2004, 10:39:20 AM EDT
Whose threatening?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- April 16, 2004, 10:41:35 AM EDT
I dunno, BeeP
- (
jb4
)
- April 16, 2004, 02:02:57 PM EDT
Depends on what you regard prison AS.
- (
pwhysall
)
- April 16, 2004, 04:51:36 PM EDT
Declare war then.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (1)
- April 16, 2004, 04:50:37 PM EDT
war IS a business, when has it not been?
- (
boxley
)
- April 16, 2004, 06:53:07 PM EDT
Not all of us, but an alarmingly high percentage.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- April 16, 2004, 10:37:26 AM EDT
got yer declaration right here
- (
boxley
)
- (26)
- April 16, 2004, 10:43:27 AM EDT
I declare War on Microsoft.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (17)
- April 16, 2004, 10:49:30 AM EDT
Its one thing to declare it.
- (
bepatient
)
- (16)
- April 16, 2004, 10:53:28 AM EDT
Then I'd be a murderer, not a nation-state capable of
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (15)
- April 16, 2004, 10:58:20 AM EDT
Ah. And what would the leader
- (
bepatient
)
- (14)
- April 16, 2004, 11:13:14 AM EDT
Be very careful with that argument.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (13)
- April 16, 2004, 02:46:27 PM EDT
And what would these things do...
- (
bepatient
)
- (12)
- April 16, 2004, 08:30:19 PM EDT
*Boggle*
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (11)
- April 18, 2004, 12:43:48 PM EDT
We've been through this before.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (10)
- April 18, 2004, 02:39:45 PM EDT
Why I cautioned Beep.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (9)
- April 18, 2004, 02:56:59 PM EDT
It wasn't funding I was discussing.
- (
bepatient
)
- (8)
- April 18, 2004, 03:00:26 PM EDT
I (mis?)read this one.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (7)
- April 18, 2004, 03:03:28 PM EDT
I would generally say no.
- (
bepatient
)
- (6)
- April 18, 2004, 03:05:49 PM EDT
Okay, I'll play.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (5)
- April 18, 2004, 03:09:13 PM EDT
We didn't.
- (
bepatient
)
- (4)
- April 18, 2004, 03:17:20 PM EDT
?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (3)
- April 18, 2004, 03:34:08 PM EDT
So fine.
- (
bepatient
)
- (2)
- April 18, 2004, 03:40:03 PM EDT
Vote for smarter people ;0)
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- April 18, 2004, 03:58:18 PM EDT
I wish there were some to vote for.
- (
bepatient
)
- April 18, 2004, 10:55:33 PM EDT
So declare war, or else STFU.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (7)
- April 16, 2004, 04:53:28 PM EDT
google bush declares war on Al Quida
- (
boxley
)
- (6)
- April 16, 2004, 10:43:22 PM EDT
Neato.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (5)
- April 19, 2004, 01:24:03 AM EDT
cant help if you are uneducated
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- April 19, 2004, 08:08:29 AM EDT
Whatever.
-NT
- (
pwhysall
)
- April 19, 2004, 10:43:18 AM EDT
War on Terrorism as successful as the War on Drugs.
- (
Silverlock
)
- (2)
- April 19, 2004, 09:30:38 AM EDT
Someone please fork this damn thing
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- (1)
- April 19, 2004, 09:44:02 AM EDT
Forked Dr. Strangelove. (new thread)
- (
jbrabeck
)
- April 19, 2004, 10:28:14 AM EDT
It's an old problem.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (13)
- April 16, 2004, 10:43:31 AM EDT
And that attitude.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (5)
- April 16, 2004, 10:51:31 AM EDT
If you want it to be a "law enforcement issue"
- (
bepatient
)
- (4)
- April 16, 2004, 10:57:17 AM EDT
You want it to be a "war"?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (3)
- April 16, 2004, 11:01:14 AM EDT
I want it solved.
- (
bepatient
)
- (2)
- April 16, 2004, 11:12:01 AM EDT
Simple solution
- (
jbrabeck
)
- (1)
- April 16, 2004, 11:48:30 AM EDT
When, indeed!
- (
jb4
)
- April 16, 2004, 02:06:32 PM EDT
That's not a declaration of war.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (6)
- April 16, 2004, 04:57:41 PM EDT
But Peter,
- (
jbrabeck
)
- (4)
- April 16, 2004, 05:09:12 PM EDT
Can someone please fork a new thread (or several)?
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- (3)
- April 16, 2004, 05:18:40 PM EDT
It'll probably die soon.
- (
Another Scott
)
- April 16, 2004, 05:24:10 PM EDT
Yeah darnit...FORK this thread!
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- April 16, 2004, 08:31:59 PM EDT
Knifing it is too much work
-NT
- (
Arkadiy
)
- April 17, 2004, 12:48:40 PM EDT
Not in the traditional sense.
- (
Another Scott
)
- April 16, 2004, 05:22:25 PM EDT
4/13/2004 Tom Toles (78 kB .gif) (new thread)
- (
Another Scott
)
- April 13, 2004, 05:25:07 PM EDT
Yes, there are - those that *won't*, even though they *can*.
- (
CRConrad
)
- April 16, 2004, 09:35:30 AM EDT
Necroeqquiphilia can do that to a person.
-NT
- (
altmann
)
- (2)
- April 12, 2004, 06:26:48 PM EDT
Necroeqquiphilia; I'll have to remember that one ;-)
-NT
- (
bbronson
)
- April 13, 2004, 12:20:46 PM EDT
ICLRPD (new thread)
- (
jb4
)
- April 13, 2004, 02:06:00 PM EDT
and they STILL don't get it!
- (
jb4
)
- April 12, 2004, 05:51:59 PM EDT
i
we
they
.org
Layering different sounds.
158 ms