3-phase voltages.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #14,697 by static 10/22/01 9:58:21 PM Reply	3-phase voltages. First of all, Australia's standard is 240V RMS AC. We are one of the few to remain at 240 instead of dropping to 220. Anyways. 3-phase voltage is usually referred to by the phase-voltage. For 240V, 3-phase is 415V. (For some reason, I seem to remember that 220V is 400V in 3-phase.) Wade. "All around me are nothing but fakes Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"
Post #14,737 by CRConrad 10/23/01 6:27:35 AM Reply	Huh? We just went TO 240, from 220! (BTW, hi--volt was 380v)
Post #14,742 by static 10/23/01 7:06:58 AM Reply	Just went to 240V...? That's very ... interesting. Maybe the forces trying to get 220V standardisation have been somewhat reduced in eficacy. Wade. "All around me are nothing but fakes Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"

220 vs 110 - (bluke) - (32) - Oct. 22, 2001, 10:18:10 AM EDT

220 is considered "safer" - (jb4) - (24) - Oct. 22, 2001, 10:24:32 AM EDT

Re: 220 is considered "safer" - (a6l6e6x) - (23) - Oct. 22, 2001, 01:43:02 PM EDT

Hrm??? - (jb4) - (8) - Oct. 22, 2001, 02:13:17 PM EDT

He's right on safety. - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - Oct. 22, 2001, 02:33:35 PM EDT

Then too: you actually *have* 220V coming in.. - (Ashton) - Oct. 22, 2001, 02:55:37 PM EDT

Isn't that exactly Edison's old anti-Tesla PR you're burpin? -NT - (CRConrad) - (5) - Oct. 22, 2001, 07:16:43 PM EDT

Yabut.. that's a can o'worms anyway. - (Ashton) - Oct. 22, 2001, 07:44:09 PM EDT

The very one - but Tesla pulled the wool . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Oct. 22, 2001, 09:54:42 PM EDT

Yeah, wasn't that *sneaky*? - out M$'d M$.. -NT - (Ashton) - Oct. 23, 2001, 03:20:37 AM EDT

But the POINT is, DC would have fried 'em just as well! -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - Oct. 23, 2001, 06:29:14 AM EDT

"Fry" is the operative word here. - (Andrew Grygus) - Oct. 23, 2001, 11:24:21 AM EDT

It's the waveform. - (imric) - (13) - Oct. 22, 2001, 05:49:41 PM EDT

Umm sorry. No. - (Ashton) - (12) - Oct. 22, 2001, 06:09:16 PM EDT

Ah, yes. - (imric) - (11) - Oct. 22, 2001, 07:06:41 PM EDT

Ah well.. now yer gettin fancy - (Ashton) - (10) - Oct. 22, 2001, 07:29:15 PM EDT

*grin* You'd think! - (imric) - (6) - Oct. 22, 2001, 07:58:09 PM EDT

Migawd.. it's in your genes! - (Ashton) - (2) - Oct. 22, 2001, 08:16:29 PM EDT

Ya ever shake hands with a farmer? - (imric) - (1) - Oct. 22, 2001, 08:34:33 PM EDT

My uncles ran a machine shop. - (Ashton) - Oct. 22, 2001, 09:05:57 PM EDT

Expensive mistake - (broomberg) - (2) - Oct. 22, 2001, 09:26:26 PM EDT

Well.. one possibility - (Ashton) - Oct. 23, 2001, 03:43:25 AM EDT

220 UPS outputs - (Ric Locke) - Oct. 23, 2001, 11:47:50 PM EDT

3-phase voltages. - (static) - (2) - Oct. 22, 2001, 09:58:21 PM EDT

Huh? We just went TO 240, from 220! (BTW, hi--volt was 380v) -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - Oct. 23, 2001, 06:27:35 AM EDT

Just went *to* 240V...? - (static) - Oct. 23, 2001, 07:06:58 AM EDT

Remains of Edison's anti-AC, pro-DC propaganda? Just a guess -NT - (CRConrad) - Oct. 22, 2001, 10:25:35 AM EDT

Early adopters. - (addison) - (5) - Oct. 22, 2001, 10:34:49 AM EDT

Like Cell Phones - (SpiceWare) - (4) - Oct. 22, 2001, 11:16:18 AM EDT

As I understand it, that's more due to market fragmentation: - (CRConrad) - Oct. 22, 2001, 11:27:51 AM EDT

CRC has that about right. - (static) - (2) - Oct. 22, 2001, 10:02:44 PM EDT

Not quite right -- GSM enforced by EU, CDMA is more advanced - (tonytib) - (1) - Oct. 22, 2001, 10:52:47 PM EDT

CDMA in .au, too - (Meerkat) - Oct. 23, 2001, 01:56:31 AM EDT

Blaphemer!
190 ms