IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I have to wonder...
... what Michel Merlin thinks of all this, since IIRC he was convinced that Microsoft did poorly in the trial only because Jackson had it out for them. :-)
Regards,

-scott anderson
New I am sure he would feel vindicated and would point out that
the USSC has not made a final ruling on the case.
thanx,
bill
can I have my ones and zeros back?
New Vindicated in one fashion only
Since the Appellate court, for the most part, agreed with Jackson.

IOW, Merlin can't use Jackson as a convenient scapegoat for the guilty ruling any longer.
Regards,

-scott anderson
New Don't kid yourselves...
...he can't read and comprehend legaleze...he would (is probably) have taken the USSC remand as a pure victory for Microsoft.

Then we'd have to spend the next 3 months suffering through USA Today articles showing why he's right.

He just doesn't get it.
Um...er...well...

I have no choice!

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
     Some finer points in Court of Appeals ruling. - (a6l6e6x) - (9)
         I remember that one; surprised the court noticed *well* - (Ashton) - (3)
             Re: I remember that one; surprised the court noticed *well* - (addison) - (2)
                 Thanks for the blind copy tip -NT - (drewk)
                 Thanks, will try elsewhere: NG on Coffey's stuff though :[ -NT - (Ashton)
         I have to wonder... - (admin) - (3)
             I am sure he would feel vindicated and would point out that - (boxley) - (2)
                 Vindicated in one fashion only - (admin) - (1)
                     Don't kid yourselves... - (bepatient)
         Loved this line - (JayMehaffey)

Perfectly clear, if you swallow the right mushrooms and squint your eyes just right.
88 ms