Typo in the new bit

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #124,921

11/10/03 11:03:36 AM

Typo in the new bit

have or not have..

Two periods. Let us know when you've incorporated all the changes so we can do a second pass.

===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.

I hate to make the critics work so hard . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (35) - Nov. 9, 2003, 08:51:55 PM EST

s/NSDAC/NASDAQ/ -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2003, 08:55:44 PM EST

Ooops, I was going to check that and fogot. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 9, 2003, 08:58:00 PM EST

s/$250 million/$210 million / - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:05:56 PM EST

And I forgot the damned "it's" scan again - fixed. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:05:50 PM EST

Re: And I forgot the damned "it's" scan again - fixed. - (deSitter) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:51:20 PM EST

Could also mention that Novell's deal with SuSE shows - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:15:26 PM EST

Right, a good point . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:23:51 PM EST

The paranoid in me - (Arkadiy) - Nov. 10, 2003, 10:51:34 AM EST

Nit Picks == 2 - (folkert) - (5) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:40:48 PM EST

KonquEror -NT - (deSitter) - (4) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:52:19 PM EST

what does: - (folkert) - (3) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:36:50 PM EST

Re: what does: - (deSitter) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:46:51 PM EST

No Probs -NT - (folkert) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:48:44 PM EST

Oh, I thought you meant: /konk-u-error/ -NT - (FuManChu) - Nov. 10, 2003, 12:12:39 AM EST

Style nit - (broomberg) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:54:50 PM EST

Noted, will change. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:00:27 PM EST

Understatement in journalism is the rule -NT - (deSitter) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:02:01 PM EST

A few things. - (Another Scott) - (5) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:03:53 PM EST

Re: A few things. - (deSitter) - (4) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:13:37 PM EST

Point taken. It's a stylistic thing, but clarity is impt. - (Another Scott) - (3) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:54:06 PM EST

Re: Point taken. It's a stylistic thing - (deSitter) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:57:16 PM EST

I understand. - (Another Scott) - Nov. 9, 2003, 11:36:10 PM EST

Re: Point taken. It's a stylistic thing - (pwhysall) - Nov. 10, 2003, 03:18:52 AM EST

Copyedit - (kmself) - Nov. 10, 2003, 12:34:52 AM EST

Re: I hate to make the critics work so hard . . - (rickmoen) - (2) - Nov. 10, 2003, 07:34:15 AM EST

"gruesome neologistic verb" - (admin) - (1) - Nov. 10, 2003, 08:21:17 AM EST

Gruesome at any age - (rickmoen) - Nov. 10, 2003, 09:48:15 PM EST

I would be less positive on Sun - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 10, 2003, 11:02:56 AM EST

Typo in the new bit - (drewk) - Nov. 10, 2003, 11:03:36 AM EST

Much cleaner - (rickmoen) - (5) - Nov. 11, 2003, 01:46:07 AM EST

Re: Much cleaner - (deSitter) - Nov. 11, 2003, 01:55:29 AM EST

Had lots of client work to do . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 11, 2003, 04:56:11 AM EST

Had lots of client work to do . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Nov. 11, 2003, 09:18:46 AM EST

Bizarre - (deSitter) - (1) - Nov. 11, 2003, 09:21:18 AM EST

Coffee . . soon -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 11, 2003, 09:33:35 AM EST

Thanks for noticing.
58 ms