IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New A few things.
1) In the intro, put a comma after "person" in "You, the business person". You = the business person, so it should be set off by commas.

2) I believe "quarter million dollar bounties" should be "quarter-million-dollar bounties". There are several more things like this below. Ask yourself, "What kind of bounties?" If it takes more than one word (here "quarter million dollar" bounties), then the words should be connected by hyphens. "capture or worm writers" should be "... of ...".

3) "due to security problem" should be "... problems".

4) "their all important stock valuation" should be "... all-important stock valuation."

5) "while the open source Apache soars" should be "... open-source ...".

6) "strong and well calculated moves" should be "... well-calculated moves".

7) "dominated small business and departmental networking" should be "... small-business and departmental networking"

8) "tied to NetWare. and NetWare has ..." should be "tied to NetWare, and ...".

9) "to the ever popular Linux" should be "... ever-popular ..."

10) "publisher outright, for the bargain price" - remove the comma.

11) I think someone caught this one: "and has propelled Novel ..." should be "Novell". "Hooray for Novel!" similarly.

12) "With a well known name... rock solid..." should be "...well-known name... rock-solid products..."

Sorry to say that I've got to run. It's a great read, Andrew! Thanks for posting it. I hope this helps.

Cheers,
Scott.



New Re: A few things.
I disagree stylisitically with overuse of hyphens as you suggest - other than "all-important" it is fine as written.

I thought AG's style was superb, and very journalistic.

edit: helpful link on hyphen style:

[link|http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/archives/9505/techwhirl-9505-01189.html|http://www.raycomm.c...l-9505-01189.html]

"When in doubt, leave it out."
-drl
Expand Edited by deSitter Nov. 9, 2003, 10:13:37 PM EST
New Point taken. It's a stylistic thing, but clarity is impt.
Your link is appreciated, but it reminds me of the John Cleese skit in "Meaning of Life" where he's the schoolteacher telling the kids when to put their [link|http://bau2.uibk.ac.at/sg/python/Scripts/MeaningOfLife/m-05-ii.html|clothes on the lower peg]... :-)

I should have referred to something like [link|http://www.mit.edu/afs/athena/course/11/11.481j/www/Suggestions.html|this ] first:

14. Hyphenation of adjectives. The general rule for using hyphens with adjectives is: two or more adjectives should be hyphenated if when they are used alone the true sense of the modification is not clear.

Write--
The base-year data were obtained from an independent survey in Kenya.

Do not write--
The base year data were obtained from an independent survey in Kenya.

(It is not base data, nor year data, but base-year data that are being described.)


If there's a chance of it being misinterpreted, hyphens should be used. I'd have to check Gryg's text again to see if I'd suggest fewer hyphens.

Thanks.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Re: Point taken. It's a stylistic thing
Well, in college I got taken-to-task for over-hyphenating. I think this comes from reading old material, which is loaded with hyphens (e.g. co-ordinates).
-drl
New I understand.
This reminds me of reading articles in The New Yorker years ago. They had this thing for spelling words like cooperate with umlauts, er, [link|http://216.239.39.104/search?q=cache:mbid-NEVKSUJ:www.eece.unm.edu/faculty/chaouki/papers/advice.ps+dierisis&hl=en&ie=UTF-8|dierisis] (scroll down).

It still looks weird to me, but I can see some (limited) sense in it.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Re: Point taken. It's a stylistic thing
co-ordinate and co-operate look perfectly fine to me :)


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
     I hate to make the critics work so hard . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (35)
         s/NSDAC/NASDAQ/ -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
             Ooops, I was going to check that and fogot. -NT - (Andrew Grygus)
         s/$250 million/$210 million / - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
             And I forgot the damned "it's" scan again - fixed. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                 Re: And I forgot the damned "it's" scan again - fixed. - (deSitter)
         Could also mention that Novell's deal with SuSE shows - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
             Right, a good point . . - (Andrew Grygus)
             The paranoid in me - (Arkadiy)
         Nit Picks == 2 - (folkert) - (5)
             KonquEror -NT - (deSitter) - (4)
                 what does: - (folkert) - (3)
                     Re: what does: - (deSitter) - (2)
                         No Probs -NT - (folkert)
                         Oh, I thought you meant: /konk-u-error/ -NT - (FuManChu)
         Style nit - (broomberg) - (2)
             Noted, will change. -NT - (Andrew Grygus)
             Understatement in journalism is the rule -NT - (deSitter)
         A few things. - (Another Scott) - (5)
             Re: A few things. - (deSitter) - (4)
                 Point taken. It's a stylistic thing, but clarity is impt. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                     Re: Point taken. It's a stylistic thing - (deSitter) - (2)
                         I understand. - (Another Scott)
                         Re: Point taken. It's a stylistic thing - (pwhysall)
         Copyedit - (kmself)
         Re: I hate to make the critics work so hard . . - (rickmoen) - (2)
             "gruesome neologistic verb" - (admin) - (1)
                 Gruesome at any age - (rickmoen)
         I would be less positive on Sun - (ben_tilly)
         Typo in the new bit - (drewk)
         Much cleaner - (rickmoen) - (5)
             Re: Much cleaner - (deSitter)
             Had lots of client work to do . . - (Andrew Grygus)
             Had lots of client work to do . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                 Bizarre - (deSitter) - (1)
                     Coffee . . soon -NT - (Andrew Grygus)

When the beans no longer cut it.
127 ms