Could also mention that Novell's deal with SuSE shows

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #124,833 by a6l6e6x 11/9/03 9:15:26 PM Reply	Could also mention that Novell's deal with SuSE shows that Novell thinks SCO's chances of stopping Linux are nil. Novell ought to know better than most what that risk was. Alex "The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer." - Henry Kissinger
Post #124,835 by Andrew Grygus 11/9/03 9:23:51 PM Reply	Right, a good point . . . . and I was thinking of putting in that Novel still has some control over SCO Group's Unix licenses, perhaps enough control to void SCO Group's entire lawsuit. I'll get that stuff included in a bit. [link\|http://www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]
Post #124,916 by Arkadiy 11/10/03 10:51:34 AM Reply	The paranoid in me says that Novell has enough IP left to protect its own distro, but they think that SCO will damage other distros so much, Novell will have the only viable distribution left on the market. -- The rich, as usual, are employing the elected. -- [link\|http://unfit2print.blogspot.com/\|http://unfit2print.blogspot.com/]

I hate to make the critics work so hard . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (35) - Nov. 9, 2003, 08:51:55 PM EST

s/NSDAC/NASDAQ/ -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2003, 08:55:44 PM EST

Ooops, I was going to check that and fogot. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 9, 2003, 08:58:00 PM EST

s/$250 million/$210 million / - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:05:56 PM EST

And I forgot the damned "it's" scan again - fixed. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:05:50 PM EST

Re: And I forgot the damned "it's" scan again - fixed. - (deSitter) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:51:20 PM EST

Could also mention that Novell's deal with SuSE shows - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:15:26 PM EST

Right, a good point . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:23:51 PM EST

The paranoid in me - (Arkadiy) - Nov. 10, 2003, 10:51:34 AM EST

Nit Picks == 2 - (folkert) - (5) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:40:48 PM EST

KonquEror -NT - (deSitter) - (4) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:52:19 PM EST

what does: - (folkert) - (3) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:36:50 PM EST

Re: what does: - (deSitter) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:46:51 PM EST

No Probs -NT - (folkert) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:48:44 PM EST

Oh, I thought you meant: /konk-u-error/ -NT - (FuManChu) - Nov. 10, 2003, 12:12:39 AM EST

Style nit - (broomberg) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2003, 09:54:50 PM EST

Noted, will change. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:00:27 PM EST

Understatement in journalism is the rule -NT - (deSitter) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:02:01 PM EST

A few things. - (Another Scott) - (5) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:03:53 PM EST

Re: A few things. - (deSitter) - (4) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:13:37 PM EST

Point taken. It's a stylistic thing, but clarity is impt. - (Another Scott) - (3) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:54:06 PM EST

Re: Point taken. It's a stylistic thing - (deSitter) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2003, 10:57:16 PM EST

I understand. - (Another Scott) - Nov. 9, 2003, 11:36:10 PM EST

Re: Point taken. It's a stylistic thing - (pwhysall) - Nov. 10, 2003, 03:18:52 AM EST

Copyedit - (kmself) - Nov. 10, 2003, 12:34:52 AM EST

Re: I hate to make the critics work so hard . . - (rickmoen) - (2) - Nov. 10, 2003, 07:34:15 AM EST

"gruesome neologistic verb" - (admin) - (1) - Nov. 10, 2003, 08:21:17 AM EST

Gruesome at any age - (rickmoen) - Nov. 10, 2003, 09:48:15 PM EST

I would be less positive on Sun - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 10, 2003, 11:02:56 AM EST

Typo in the new bit - (drewk) - Nov. 10, 2003, 11:03:36 AM EST

Much cleaner - (rickmoen) - (5) - Nov. 11, 2003, 01:46:07 AM EST

Re: Much cleaner - (deSitter) - Nov. 11, 2003, 01:55:29 AM EST

Had lots of client work to do . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 11, 2003, 04:56:11 AM EST

Had lots of client work to do . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Nov. 11, 2003, 09:18:46 AM EST

Bizarre - (deSitter) - (1) - Nov. 11, 2003, 09:21:18 AM EST

Coffee . . soon -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 11, 2003, 09:33:35 AM EST

Severity set to `grave'.
51 ms