I came up with the idea of removing everything that makes him a man (castration and a frontal lobotomy) and dropping him off in front of the Taliban HQ, a drooling snivelling eunick (sp?) but quite alive (so he doesn't become a martyr), as a warning to other terrorists.
A lobotomy will render him in no shape to do any further harm. It will also serve the purpose of deterrence. Castration will also enhance deterrent value. I suppose the Supreme Court will have to rule on the question of "cruel and unusual punishment." I'd argue that anything calculated to deter is not cruel, though it may well be unusual. If they give the okay, go for it.
What else matters? Please no vengefulness or sadism. I'm not into that. I just want the problem solved.
The whole intent of this dark scheme (which I would never expect to have enacted of course) is as a deterrent. Who would want to go through the rest of their lives as a completely impotent (both sexually and intellectually) man. The lobotomy also prevents any other terrorist schemes to come from that mind. If he kept full use of his intelligence, I would expect he would use it to strike back still. It isn't so much meant to be a lifelong torture for him as a symbol for those that remain.
Mind you, I'm not really this cruel, I just needed to give the reptillian part a little leash after the attacks; and that's what it came up with.
. . is to add an Osama Bin Laden exhibit to the national zoo (bullet proof glass all around, of course). This should be particularly popular around feeding time (pork sausage).
Of course, we will have to let it be known that due to Bin Laden's health problems, we will fairly soon need a replacement for the exhibit and are evaluating other specimens in the wild.