Wrong.

Post #110,370 by bepatient 7/18/03 1:54:04 PM Reply	Wrong. Because, you see, the principle witness in the case of the "16 words" continues to insist that those words were >true<. In other words...Blair is not keeping a "spotted dress" in his closet. If you wish to impeach the man...your gonna have to pick a >different< lie than the one you claim to be included in the past SOTU address. If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #110,378 by Simon_Jester 7/18/03 2:50:28 PM 7/18/03 2:51:45 PM Reply	About which.... "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." Certainly the statement is true. What's also true is that CIA looked into the claim and found it faulty and tried to have it pulled. So, what's that quote: "Tell the truth, the WHOLE truth...and nothing but the truth...." And, btw, Hannity did argue the "lots of laws, little laws" yesterday as well. Shrug. Edited by Simon_Jester July 18, 2003, 02:51:45 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #110,480 by bepatient 7/19/03 10:06:05 AM Reply	The statement is still true. The Brits are standing by that statement saying that the parts that the CIA found fault with were known to them and their intel >still< suggests the attempted purchase. Look...there are lots of lies to choose from...the guy's a politician...but if your gonna try and get him for telling one...pick a real one. At least he's smart enough to know what >is< is;-) (not much more though) If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]

Welcome to IWETHEY!