Re: Programmable Windows-friendly code editor?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #103,062 by systems 5/22/03 7:40:46 AM Reply	Re: Programmable Windows-friendly code editor? Well, you did not say free I think this is the best text editor ever made for windows vedit @ [link\|http://www.vedit.com/\|http://www.vedit.com/] also check check visual slickedit [link\|http://www.slickedit.com/\|http://www.slickedit.com/] and Crisp [link\|http://www.vital.com/\|http://www.vital.com/]
Post #103,083 by Arkadiy 5/22/03 10:13:52 AM Reply	He did not say "cheap" either, so allow me to introduce [link\|http://www.multiedit.com/\|MultiEdit]. Windows/DOS only, unfortunately. -- Less Is More. In my book, About Face, I introduce over 50 powerful design axioms. This is one of them. --Alan Cooper. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum
Post #103,170 by jb4 5/22/03 5:41:23 PM Reply	Re: He did not say "cheap" either, so And allow me to introduce [link\|http://www.getsoft.com/\|Ed for Windows] Massively configurable, contains its own (C-like; no objects to confound...) scripting languages (much of the editor itself was written in this language), and about a quarter of the cost of CodeWright (which I consider to be the most overrated program of its genre.) Alas, like the rest mentioned here, only for Windoze. (Been trying to get Neville to write it for Linux, but up to now, no luck...He's very Visual C-pus-pus oriented, and passed on the chance to write it in C++Builder.) jb4 "We continue to live in a world where all our know-how is locked into binary files in an unknown format. If our documents are our corporate memory, Microsoft still has us all condemned to Alzheimer's." Simon Phipps, SUN Microsystems

Programmable Windows-friendly code editor? - (tablizer) - (27) - May 22, 2003, 03:20:59 AM EDT

www.eclipse.org - (pwhysall) - May 22, 2003, 03:25:07 AM EDT

www.ultraedit.com - (Yendor) - (3) - May 22, 2003, 04:23:31 AM EDT

Ultra-seconded - (deSitter) - (2) - May 22, 2003, 10:23:31 AM EDT

Ultra-Edit appears not to have Turing-complete scripting - (tablizer) - (1) - May 24, 2003, 04:02:18 PM EDT

Do tell. Is that as bad as not having a Euro symbol? -NT - (deSitter) - May 25, 2003, 02:42:07 AM EDT

Re: Programmable Windows-friendly code editor? - (systems) - (2) - May 22, 2003, 07:40:46 AM EDT

He did not say "cheap" either, so - (Arkadiy) - (1) - May 22, 2003, 10:13:52 AM EDT

Re: He did not say "cheap" either, so - (jb4) - May 22, 2003, 05:41:23 PM EDT

Dunno if it's "programmable", exactly... - (CRConrad) - May 22, 2003, 08:08:39 AM EDT

I use GWDSoft GTEdit - (folkert) - May 22, 2003, 08:34:53 AM EDT

Ultraedit or Notetab; as seen elsewhere in this thread - (bbronson) - May 22, 2003, 10:42:36 AM EDT

Turing Complete? - (broomberg) - (15) - May 25, 2003, 12:51:34 AM EDT

re: Turing-Complete - (tablizer) - (14) - May 25, 2003, 05:35:13 PM EDT

OK, slick has it - (broomberg) - (13) - May 26, 2003, 12:28:27 AM EDT

Ed is $170 versus Slick for $270 - (tablizer) - (12) - May 28, 2003, 03:10:03 PM EDT

eeeeemaaaaaaacssssssss! - (pwhysall) - May 28, 2003, 04:50:21 PM EDT

Emacs can do CUA. It takes 20 seconds to make it happen - (Arkadiy) - (10) - May 28, 2003, 06:03:23 PM EDT

CUA - (jake123) - May 28, 2003, 07:52:21 PM EDT

Emacsaphobia - (tablizer) - (8) - May 30, 2003, 06:23:17 PM EDT

Except that doesn't happen. - (admin) - (7) - May 30, 2003, 06:32:53 PM EDT

Maybe I am better at bumping the wrong button than you - (tablizer) - (5) - May 31, 2003, 01:09:22 AM EDT

What wrong button? - (pwhysall) - (4) - May 31, 2003, 01:46:13 AM EDT

It is a pulled-out-of-my-arse guess -NT - (tablizer) - (3) - May 31, 2003, 02:18:27 AM EDT

Fairy nuff. - (pwhysall) - (2) - May 31, 2003, 03:23:23 AM EDT

Dahm yew... - (folkert) - (1) - May 31, 2003, 09:30:08 AM EDT

Hay, I dig yorzez spailing -NT - (tablizer) - June 14, 2003, 03:03:10 PM EDT

Heh. - (pwhysall) - May 31, 2003, 01:45:51 AM EDT

Hell Carnate.
88 ms