IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I'll put in a call to the Wild.
and tell them to spot the Ducks 3 games, just to keep it interesting for your. ;-b

I did watch the game last night. First time in a long time, as I am not a profession, hockey fan. Prefer the High School games. Not a fan of "Boxing on ice". I was surprised, little fighting, just good hockey...
[link|mailto:jbrabeck@attbi.com|Joe]
New Not so much fighting anymore
It's more real hockey than boxing on ice, these days. Early 90's, IIRC, they really started cracking down on the fighting. I still would prefer to see more of it (though not as much as there used to be), but I will admit that the game has improved because of its absence.
-YendorMike

[link|http://www.hope-ride.org/|http://www.hope-ride.org/]
New Yeah it's down quite a bit
Notice there's no bench clearing brawls anymore unlike some other sport *cough*baseball*cough*. I've never bought into the argument that Americans don't like hockey because there's fighting in it. Hogwash. Aside from the original four American markets and the original expansion markets, there isn't much interest because there is no natural ice there. No skating, no hockey. Baseball, football and basketball can be played anywhere and they've been in the American conscious for much longer than hockey, again excluding the limited original four markets.

Eliminating fighting means that the stick-work will go up. That's classic in American college and European hockey. That's where players get hurt. Aside from bruises and the odd cut, you never see players get hurt from fighting. Now of course, as in anything, there is a limit on how much fighting there should be. Too much and it takes away from the game. Another thing that should be cracked down on severly is the showy bullshit stuff after fights some players do. The refs should tack on an extra two minutes on the five minute penalty and give the other team a powerplay. That'll cut that shit down.
lister
New Disagree
I've never bought into the argument that Americans don't like hockey because there's fighting in it. Hogwash. Aside from the original four American markets and the original expansion markets, there isn't much interest because there is no natural ice there. No skating, no hockey.

Watching hockey for "hockey" was like watch a porn movie for the plot. The hockey was a transition from fight to fight... the porn "plot" was an excuse to switch sex scenes.

I, for one, quit watching professional hockey because of the fighting. And, now that I've seen that it's been toned down, returned to hockey, I may start watching it again.

I do agree with your lack of ice, lack of interest. We have lots of ice here (usually). And was hard to see the No Stars move to Dallas (Because of Debbie?). Dallas and hockey? California and hockey? Let's move the games outside on natural ice, and get the interest back. Of course there goes the money...
[link|mailto:jbrabeck@attbi.com|Joe]
     Bums - (jake123) - (11)
         did so - (cforde) - (5)
             Next on the menu - Wild Rice Soup + Duck quackers - (jbrabeck) - (4)
                 Goooooooo Wild! - (Yendor) - (3)
                     Wild - (jbrabeck) - (2)
                         Re: Wild - (Steve Lowe) - (1)
                             Lemme know when, will spring for 1st beer... -NT - (jbrabeck)
         Shocked this morning - (lister) - (4)
             I'll put in a call to the Wild. - (jbrabeck) - (3)
                 Not so much fighting anymore - (Yendor) - (2)
                     Yeah it's down quite a bit - (lister) - (1)
                         Disagree - (jbrabeck)

It was the internet of the day. It was delivered by Fiber Coptics.
35 ms