Terrorist or Soldier

Post #8,576 by JayMehaffey 9/12/01 11:32:47 AM Reply	Terrorist or Soldier The question of them terrorists or soldiers is a rather relative one. They don't meet my definition of soldier, but that is not because of the nature of the attack, rather because of the goal. The Pentagon is a legitimate military target, but the World Trade Center certainly isn't. The WTC was selected only because of the extremely high number of civilian that would be killed, and that marks them as terrorists to me. As for 'evil', I'm not quite sure what you are asking with this question. I understand that civilian casualties are an unavoidable effect of war. But intentionally targeting civilian populations for destruction is certainly evil. And yes, I consider some the bombing done by the Allies during WWII to be fairly evil, mostly the firebombing Japanese cities. I don't know of any bombing that was done just to cause as many civilian casualties as possible though. Jay
Post #8,581 by jbrabeck 9/12/01 11:45:28 AM Reply	Re: Terrorist or Soldier Who is the "evil" one? The pilot who flys the mission or the leader who orders it? Was the "soldier" who hijacked the plane that crashed into the Pentagon 'evil'? Was the "terrorists" who hijacked the planes that crashed into the WTC 'evil'? What is/was the "status" of the person who hijacked the fourth plane and 'failed' in achieving his/her mission? Soldier because target was probably the pentagon or terrorist because the mission failed and "only" killed civilians? [link\|mailto:jbrabeck@mn.mediaone.net\|Joe]
Post #8,598 by JayMehaffey 9/12/01 12:15:53 PM Reply	Re: Terrorist or Soldier The leader who ordered the attack is certainly evil. The question of the individual people that carried it out being is evil is more complex, something that can't be answered without knowing the people themselves. But in general, if the voluntarily carried out the attack then they probably fall into the side of evil. The degree of evil would vary from person to person. It's very likely that some of the people where simple teens that got caught up in a religious frenzy and didn't really consider what they where doing. I would consider such people evil, but not nearly to the same degree as the life long terrorists that gets a kick out of hurting others or the leaders that worked out the attack to kill as many bystanders as possible. Some of the people involved may have been duped or blackmailed into involvment, which renders their cases that much more complex. If the line between good and evil was simple, even we humans would have figured it out. Jay
Post #8,612 by GBert 9/12/01 1:04:32 PM Reply	Bombing to cause civ casualties: Dresden 1945 This is what I know (IIRC) about the firebombing of Dresden. No military targets (factories, plants, installations) in the city, a fact known to everyone on both sides. Because of this, city never bombed before and packed with hundreds of thousands of refugees from the east fleeing the advancing soviet armies in addition to its 600,000 inhabitants. Firebombed by thousands of British and American bombers in multiple waves Feb 13 & 14 1945 (ten weeks before German surrender). Temperatures reached a thousand degrees centigrade, and the city burned for a week. Civilian deaths impossible to calculate, estimated between 135,000 and 300,000. Utter devastation, massive loss of life, terror. No militarily significant targets. Giovanni
Post #8,738 by Ashton 9/12/01 8:24:15 PM Reply	Yes, a war crime, that. Probably much better known about, for Kurt Vonnegut's brilliant story (he was there, in that bunker, in Dresden). ONLY because we won - it was not prosecuted. My Lai OTOH, a lesser crime, committed much later and by a lower echelon of 'ours' - we at least pursued. It's probably just not imaginable that a 'winner' would submit to the fantasy of a fairwitness, and submit to her judgment of deeds done along the way to that winning. Would need a mature species, for such an event. Maybe in the next yuga.. A.
Post #8,786 by Andrew Grygus 9/12/01 11:43:16 PM Reply	Yes, Dresden was a war crime It was pure vengence, no military value. Unfortunately it's really hard to get your public behind hanging your own war heros, especially when the other side was so inescapably the bad guys. [link\|http://www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]

Welcome to IWETHEY!