IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
News Picks Forum
/
"not so picky" or "not so accurate", either applies.
Post #78,465
by
mmoffitt
1/31/03 3:51:36 PM
Reply
"not so picky" or "not so accurate", either applies.
Post #78,552
by
bepatient
1/31/03 10:19:33 PM
Reply
perhaps you overlooked the punctuation?
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday!
Laurie Anderson
[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Boycott Rush movement gathering steam
- (
Silverlock
)
- (57)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 09:51:41 AM EST
very interesting, instead of offering a replacement
- (
boxley
)
- (11)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 09:56:30 AM EST
Cuomo had interesting insight on that.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (10)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 09:38:22 PM EST
Exactly
- (
Silverlock
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 10:49:03 PM EST
ROLF!! hoohaaa, you dont listen to leftwing radio I take it?
- (
boxley
)
- (8)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:19:18 PM EST
Ever heard of Clearchannel?
- (
Silverlock
)
- (6)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:41:54 PM EST
Clearchannel is a business seeking to earn money
- (
boxley
)
- (5)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:44:41 PM EST
So there's not much market for Randi?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (4)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 03:46:14 PM EST
How is Rush's deal structured?
- (
boxley
)
- (3)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 04:30:25 PM EST
Again, you're making my point.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (2)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 07:58:07 PM EST
then why is Sharpton running and maxine waters elected?
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 08:39:15 PM EST
Because some Can.. fight Decible with Decibel. Free choice.
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 09:09:21 PM EST
Randi Rhodes? He was awesome with Ozzie!
-NT
- (
tuberculosis
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 08:32:23 PM EST
Heh heh...
- (
bepatient
)
- (40)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 10:15:00 AM EST
How creepy
- (
Silverlock
)
- (39)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 03:58:23 PM EST
Heheh. *some* undoubtedly are.
- (
imric
)
- (37)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 04:37:18 PM EST
Nope
- (
Silverlock
)
- (25)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 04:38:29 PM EST
So ANSWER is a pro American Organization?
- (
boxley
)
- (22)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 04:46:20 PM EST
Careful there Bill
- (
Silverlock
)
- (21)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 04:48:41 PM EST
french godwin attempt ^^I^>
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (20)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 04:50:49 PM EST
French Godwin
- (
deSitter
)
- (1)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 06:27:22 PM EST
Oops he mentioned both...
- (
inthane-chan
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 06:29:05 PM EST
Nope again
- (
Silverlock
)
- (17)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:03:50 PM EST
do I agree with YOUR statement, no
- (
boxley
)
- (16)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:22:59 PM EST
No
- (
Silverlock
)
- (15)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:46:56 PM EST
are they trying to silence rush? yes/no
- (
boxley
)
- (14)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:51:57 PM EST
Yes they are
- (
Silverlock
)
- (10)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:59:35 PM EST
I see so the first ammendment is selectively enforcd?
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (9)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:02:54 AM EST
I don't think you understand what it means
- (
Silverlock
)
- (8)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:05:38 AM EST
perhaps you would care to expound?
- (
boxley
)
- (7)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:28:16 AM EST
Everybody in the US has the right to be wrong...
- (
imric
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:32:37 AM EST
Not only misreading my position,
- (
Silverlock
)
- (5)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 08:52:29 AM EST
If you dont like the message, turn it off
- (
boxley
)
- (4)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 09:00:15 AM EST
Yeah, right.
-NT
- (
Silverlock
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 09:38:06 AM EST
Think of it as a public debate -
- (
Ashton
)
- (1)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 09:52:28 AM EST
restarted debate in politics
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 09:55:08 AM EST
Listen, you nitwit, this is how it is: (new thread)
- (
CRConrad
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 10:08:23 AM EST
Come off it, Box: "Silence" - HARDLY
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 02:10:52 AM EST
The term "demagogue" comes to mind
- (
jb4
)
- (1)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:17:28 PM EST
demagogue, hardly he's not that good
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:20:06 PM EST
Yah. Agreed.
- (
imric
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 05:00:29 PM EST
Oh, come on. You're not that naive.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 09:39:55 PM EST
Yes
- (
Silverlock
)
- (10)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:10:21 PM EST
Yes? Really? So you are saying
- (
imric
)
- (9)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 11:48:41 PM EST
Huh?
- (
Silverlock
)
- (8)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:04:22 AM EST
Um - and I was pointing out that
- (
imric
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:25:56 AM EST
Simple inference?
- (
bepatient
)
- (6)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:16:27 PM EST
Stalinist, not communist agenda
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (4)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 10:44:57 AM EST
Re: Stalinist, not communist agenda
- (
bepatient
)
- (2)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:23:26 PM EST
"not so picky" or "not so accurate", either applies.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 03:51:36 PM EST
perhaps you overlooked the punctuation?
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 10:19:33 PM EST
A Stalinist is just a Communist who follows through.
- (
marlowe
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 03:06:41 PM EST
PrincipAL, Goddammit! How fucking hard can that *be*?!? (new thread)
- (
CRConrad
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 11:22:20 AM EST
No I don't
- (
bepatient
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 06:29:36 PM EST
<snicker> my first thought:
- (
hnick
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 10:37:47 AM EST
They don't care for Canadian power trios?
- (
marlowe
)
- Jan. 30, 2003, 03:33:48 PM EST
CBS Marketwatch needs userid/pswd
- (
jb4
)
- (1)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:07:22 PM EST
Linked from another site
- (
Silverlock
)
- Jan. 31, 2003, 12:34:42 PM EST
i
we
they
.org
Hence these societies employ their own versions of summary judgment and Rule 11 of the aforementioned Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
135 ms