No I don't

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #78,159

by bepatient

1/30/03 6:29:36 PM

No I don't

agree that they are unpatriotic because they are protesting.

There were several organisations involved in those protests that >are< admittedly unpatriotic and communist...ANSWER is a front for the Workers World Party. They are, as Rush stated, communists.

This guy wasn't one of them, obviously. And I'm certain that he felt insulted at being lumped in with ANSWER when Rush said this.

But...thems the facts...the principal organisers were the [link|http://www.workers.org/wwp.php|WWP]

You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson}

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]

Boycott Rush movement gathering steam - (Silverlock) - (57) - Jan. 30, 2003, 09:51:41 AM EST

very interesting, instead of offering a replacement - (boxley) - (11) - Jan. 30, 2003, 09:56:30 AM EST

Cuomo had interesting insight on that. - (mmoffitt) - (10) - Jan. 30, 2003, 09:38:22 PM EST

Exactly - (Silverlock) - Jan. 30, 2003, 10:49:03 PM EST

ROLF!! hoohaaa, you dont listen to leftwing radio I take it? - (boxley) - (8) - Jan. 30, 2003, 11:19:18 PM EST

Ever heard of Clearchannel? - (Silverlock) - (6) - Jan. 30, 2003, 11:41:54 PM EST

Clearchannel is a business seeking to earn money - (boxley) - (5) - Jan. 30, 2003, 11:44:41 PM EST

So there's not much market for Randi? - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Jan. 31, 2003, 03:46:14 PM EST

How is Rush's deal structured? - (boxley) - (3) - Jan. 31, 2003, 04:30:25 PM EST

Again, you're making my point. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Jan. 31, 2003, 07:58:07 PM EST

then why is Sharpton running and maxine waters elected? -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2003, 08:39:15 PM EST

Because some Can.. fight Decible with Decibel. Free choice. -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 31, 2003, 09:09:21 PM EST

Randi Rhodes? He was awesome with Ozzie! -NT - (tuberculosis) - Jan. 31, 2003, 08:32:23 PM EST

Heh heh... - (bepatient) - (40) - Jan. 30, 2003, 10:15:00 AM EST

How creepy - (Silverlock) - (39) - Jan. 30, 2003, 03:58:23 PM EST

Heheh. *some* undoubtedly are. - (imric) - (37) - Jan. 30, 2003, 04:37:18 PM EST

Nope - (Silverlock) - (25) - Jan. 30, 2003, 04:38:29 PM EST

So ANSWER is a pro American Organization? - (boxley) - (22) - Jan. 30, 2003, 04:46:20 PM EST

Careful there Bill - (Silverlock) - (21) - Jan. 30, 2003, 04:48:41 PM EST

french godwin attempt ^^I^> -NT - (boxley) - (20) - Jan. 30, 2003, 04:50:49 PM EST

French Godwin - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 30, 2003, 06:27:22 PM EST

Oops he mentioned both... - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 30, 2003, 06:29:05 PM EST

Nope again - (Silverlock) - (17) - Jan. 30, 2003, 11:03:50 PM EST

do I agree with YOUR statement, no - (boxley) - (16) - Jan. 30, 2003, 11:22:59 PM EST

No - (Silverlock) - (15) - Jan. 30, 2003, 11:46:56 PM EST

are they trying to silence rush? yes/no - (boxley) - (14) - Jan. 30, 2003, 11:51:57 PM EST

Yes they are - (Silverlock) - (10) - Jan. 30, 2003, 11:59:35 PM EST

I see so the first ammendment is selectively enforcd? -NT - (boxley) - (9) - Jan. 31, 2003, 12:02:54 AM EST

I don't think you understand what it means - (Silverlock) - (8) - Jan. 31, 2003, 12:05:38 AM EST

perhaps you would care to expound? - (boxley) - (7) - Jan. 31, 2003, 12:28:16 AM EST

Everybody in the US has the right to be wrong... - (imric) - Jan. 31, 2003, 12:32:37 AM EST

Not only misreading my position, - (Silverlock) - (5) - Jan. 31, 2003, 08:52:29 AM EST

If you dont like the message, turn it off - (boxley) - (4) - Jan. 31, 2003, 09:00:15 AM EST

Yeah, right. -NT - (Silverlock) - Jan. 31, 2003, 09:38:06 AM EST

Think of it as a public debate - - (Ashton) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2003, 09:52:28 AM EST

restarted debate in politics -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 31, 2003, 09:55:08 AM EST

Listen, you nitwit, this is how it is: (new thread) - (CRConrad) - Jan. 31, 2003, 10:08:23 AM EST

Come off it, Box: "Silence" - HARDLY - (Ashton) - Jan. 31, 2003, 02:10:52 AM EST

The term "demagogue" comes to mind - (jb4) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2003, 12:17:28 PM EST

demagogue, hardly he's not that good -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 31, 2003, 12:20:06 PM EST

Yah. Agreed. - (imric) - Jan. 30, 2003, 05:00:29 PM EST

Oh, come on. You're not that naive. - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 30, 2003, 09:39:55 PM EST

Yes - (Silverlock) - (10) - Jan. 30, 2003, 11:10:21 PM EST

Yes? Really? So you are saying - (imric) - (9) - Jan. 30, 2003, 11:48:41 PM EST

Huh? - (Silverlock) - (8) - Jan. 31, 2003, 12:04:22 AM EST

Um - and I was pointing out that - (imric) - Jan. 31, 2003, 12:25:56 AM EST

Simple inference? - (bepatient) - (6) - Jan. 31, 2003, 12:16:27 PM EST

Stalinist, not communist agenda -NT - (boxley) - (4) - Jan. 31, 2003, 10:44:57 AM EST

Re: Stalinist, not communist agenda - (bepatient) - (2) - Jan. 31, 2003, 12:23:26 PM EST

"not so picky" or "not so accurate", either applies. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2003, 03:51:36 PM EST

perhaps you overlooked the punctuation? -NT - (bepatient) - Jan. 31, 2003, 10:19:33 PM EST

A Stalinist is just a Communist who follows through. - (marlowe) - Jan. 31, 2003, 03:06:41 PM EST

PrincipAL, Goddammit! How fucking hard can that *be*?!? (new thread) - (CRConrad) - Jan. 31, 2003, 11:22:20 AM EST

No I don't - (bepatient) - Jan. 30, 2003, 06:29:36 PM EST

<snicker> my first thought: - (hnick) - Jan. 30, 2003, 10:37:47 AM EST

They don't care for Canadian power trios? - (marlowe) - Jan. 30, 2003, 03:33:48 PM EST

CBS Marketwatch needs userid/pswd - (jb4) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2003, 12:07:22 PM EST

Linked from another site - (Silverlock) - Jan. 31, 2003, 12:34:42 PM EST

iwethey.org

Mmmm... Flavored Beer.
78 ms