Actually I think claiming either of those things goes to far also. What I was trying to point out tought, is that what is and what is not a basic right is a complex and open question.
Take the right to bear arms, the right to have privacy, the right to live without government interference, or the right to medical care. There are lots of things that people claim as rights or claim are not rights. Why some and not others?
The way you put the question made it seem that you where taking the rights we have in the US as being the basic rights, making the statement that the US meets those requirments a bit of circular logic. If you want to judge if the US meets the requirements of supporting basic rights, you need to better define what they are.
Jay