"We were attacked by Saudi Arabians in al Queda."

Post #71,294 by boxley 12/29/02 5:30:18 AM Reply	"We were attacked by Saudi Arabians in al Queda." where were they living at the time did we politley ask the landlord to evict them what was their answer In america what are the rico laws can we attack the landlords house when he refuses to evict wanted felons you dont like Justin because he is gay :-) Coemsky is a clueless anarchist because as an anarchist he doesnt want to end government he wants a global leftist one. thanx tovaritch, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] You think that you can trust the government to look after your rights? ask an Indian
Post #71,312 by Brandioch 12/29/02 1:43:10 PM Reply	Where were they living? I was born in New Jersey. I am a US citizen. If I move to Mexico for a while, I do NOT become a Mexican. Do I really need to explain this to you? Well, it seems I do. did we politley ask the landlord to evict them No. We did not. When they asked to see our "evidence", we refused. That is NOT "polite" by any stretch of the imagination. what was their answer "Show us your proof". Just as a landlord would ask to see your search warrant in the US. In america what are the rico laws In the US, we'd have to have a search warrant issued by someone who had jurisdiction over the location where the building was. can we attack the landlords house when he refuses to evict wanted felons Yes. Provided that we have followed all the requirements and have the search warrant and so forth. If the landlord is aiding the felons and so forth. you dont like Justin because he is gay :-) "gay" is being re-defined as "ignorant of the facts"? Coemsky is a clueless anarchist because as an anarchist he doesnt want to end government he wants a global leftist one. Whether Noam is right or wrong is another topic. In this thread, I'm pointing out where Justin's fantasy diverges from reality.
Post #71,315 by boxley 12/29/02 1:58:16 PM Reply	No. We did not. When they asked to see our "evidence", The evidence of a bin laden tape with a Senior member of the taliban ruling group tee heeing over how well the trade centers went down exactly as planned isnt good enough? If it isnt no proof we could have given would have been accepted. As stated before in other threads pashto culture could not have given up bin laden under any circumstances without destroying the talibans authority to rule. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] You think that you can trust the government to look after your rights? ask an Indian
Post #71,371 by Brandioch 12/29/02 8:26:47 PM Reply	Bzzzzt! Chronological error. The evidence of a bin laden tape with a Senior member of the taliban ruling group tee heeing over how well the trade centers went down exactly as planned isnt good enough? That tape was found AFTER we invaded. I really expected better from you. Nor did we present that to them as "evidence". Well, we couldn't have because we didn't have it until AFTER we invaded. As stated before in other threads pashto culture could not have given up bin laden under any circumstances without destroying the talibans authority to rule. Now you switch to the "well, even if we HAD done it correctly, it wouldn't have mattered". Yes, that was stated before. But that does not make it a fact. It would have been very easy for them to have found some excuse to cut their ties to Osama in a way that would allow them to save face amongst their people. But we never gave them that chance, did we? We told them to give him up or we were going to come in and get him. Which put them in the position of giving him up and losing face for backing down from us or fighting us. They asked for a way out by demanding to see our evidence and we wouldn't even give them that.
Post #71,380 by boxley 12/29/02 9:12:37 PM Reply	bang brandi's head on floor That tape was found AFTER we invaded. showing that the taliban ABSOFUCKLUTELY KNEW BIN LADEN DID IT!!!!!!!!!!!! what part of "was aware that bin laden did it" and "demanding proof" do you have problem with? thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] You think that you can trust the government to look after your rights? ask an Indian
Post #71,394 by Brandioch 12/29/02 9:45:24 PM Reply	Because you can't keep your timeline straight? showing that the taliban ABSOFUCKLUTELY KNEW BIN LADEN DID IT!!!!!!!!!!!! what part of "was aware that bin laden did it" and "demanding proof" do you have problem with? I'm not the one with the problem with it. I'm the one putting these facts in a coherent timeline for you. Strange that you've managed to forget about it already. So, you say that the Taliban knew Osama was guilty.... And they asked us for our evidence that he was guilty.... And we didn't provide it.... Because the Taliban already knew Osama was guilty. Okaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay. I'm sure that makes sense to you. In some manner.
Post #71,395 by boxley 12/29/02 9:51:00 PM Reply	Im glad you have admitted you are wrong on this but no apology is needed. Carry on. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] You think that you can trust the government to look after your rights? ask an Indian
Post #71,423 by Brandioch 12/30/02 2:37:27 AM Reply	You've really deteriorated. Must be the Marlowe influence on you. Sad. Oh well.
Post #71,451 by boxley 12/30/02 9:34:36 AM Reply	like I said no need to apologise :-) will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] You think that you can trust the government to look after your rights? ask an Indian

Welcome to IWETHEY!